Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)

dc.contributor.authorDíaz Ariza, Diana Marcela
dc.contributor.authorAguilar Galeano, Estíbaliz
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Castiblanco, Claudia Paola
dc.contributor.orcidDíaz Ariza, Diana Marcela [0000-0002-8606-3234]spa
dc.contributor.orcidAguilar Galeano, Estíbaliz [0000-0002-8942-1164]spa
dc.contributor.orcidGarcía Castiblanco, Claudia Paola [0000-0002-3882-5556]spa
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-30T21:30:20Z
dc.date.available2024-10-30T21:30:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-05
dc.description.abstractDesde los inicios de la apuesta multilateral por el crecimiento verde, se han generado un sinnúmero de políticas locales, de carácter nacional, para dar respuesta a esta demanda mundial. Al mismo tiempo, ha crecido el interés de investigar y profundizar sobre la implementación y evaluación de los programas derivados de los compromisos internacionales. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar un análisis comprensivo sobre el estado de la investigación respecto al crecimiento verde y la política pública en la última década (2011-2021). Se encuentra que la mayor parte de la producción académica se da en Europa y Asia, y los tópicos con mayor interés son los condicionantes de la efectividad de la política pública, los direccionamientos en tecnología e innovación, la inversión, la evaluación de la política y la discusión conceptual sobre la que se soporta la política. El artículo muestra el debate sobre estos asuntos.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishSince the beginning of the multilateral commitment to green growth, many local policies have been generated. At the same time, there has been a growing interest in researching and deepening the implementation and evaluation of programs derived from international commitments. The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive analysis on the state of research regarding green growth and public policy in the last decade (2011 - 2021). For this purpose, a systematic review of the literature was made, identifying the relevant publications with the keywords: “green growth” and “public policy”, and “bioeconomy” and “public policy” in the search engines of the Scopus and Web of Science databases. It is found that most of the academic production takes place in Europe and Asia, and the topics with greater interest are the determinants of the e!ectiveness of public policy, the directions in technology and innovation, investment, policy evaluation and conceptual discussion on which policy is supported.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4660
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.identifier.issn0124-0781spa
dc.identifier.issn2590-8669spa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/27239
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/4660/3724spa
dc.relation.referencesAguilar Galeano, E., & Figueroa Espinel, J. F. (2018). La Política Pública Distrital de Ruralidad de Bogotá D.C., Implementación de una política ambiental en el marco del desarrollo humano. Editorial Uniagustiniana. https://doi. org/10.28970/9789585498167
dc.relation.referencesBagheri, M., Guevara, Z., Alikarami, M., Kennedy, C. A., & Doluweera, G. (2018). Green growth planning: A multi-factor energy inputoutput analysis of the Canadian economy. Energy Economics, 74, 708-720. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2018.07.015
dc.relation.referencesBanerjee, O., Bagstad, K. J., Cicowiez, M., Dudek, S., Horridge, M., Alavalapati, J. R. R., Masozera, M., Rukundo, E., & Rutebuka, E. (2020). Economic, land use, and ecosystem services impacts of Rwanda’s Green Growth Strategy: An application of the IEEM+ESM platform. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 138779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2020.138779
dc.relation.referencesBaran, B. (2015). Support for renewable energy in Germany as an example of e%ective public policy. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(2), 143- 158. https://doi.org/10.12775/OEC.2015.017
dc.relation.referencesBassi, A. (2016). Moving Towards Integrated Policy Formulation and Evaluation: The Green Economy Model. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 16(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1515/ rtuect-2015-0009
dc.relation.referencesBéfort , N. (2020). Going beyond de!nitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested !elds. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119923. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119923
dc.relation.referencesBéfort, N., & Nieddu, M. (2020). Bioéconomie : un retour historique sur deux problématisations de l’usage des ressources renouvelables. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 28(3-4), 216-225. https:// doi.org/10.1051/NSS/2021011
dc.relation.referencesBentsen, N. S., Larsen, S., & Stupak, I. (2019). Sustainability governance of the Danish bioeconomy - The case of bioenergy and biomaterials from agriculture. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9(1), 1-14. https:// doi.org/10.1186/S13705-019-0222-3/TABLES/1
dc.relation.referencesBouzaher, A., Sahin, S., & Yeldan, E. (2015). How to green: a general equilibrium investigation of environmental policies for sustained growth with an application to Turkey’s economy. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 8(1), 49-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12076-014- 0124-0/TABLES/4
dc.relation.referencesBruckman, V. J., Haruthaithanasan, M., Miller, R. O., Terada, T., Brenner, A. K., Kraxner, F., & Flaspohler, D. (2018). Sustainable Forest Bioenergy Development Strategies in Indochina: Collaborative E%ort to Establish Regional Policies. Forests 2018, 9(4), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/F9040223
dc.relation.referencesBurkolter, P., & Perch, L. (2014). Greening growth in the south: Practice, policies and new frontiers. South African Journal of International A%airs, 21(2), 235-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 0220461.2014.941917
dc.relation.referencesCaplan, A. J., & Go, D. H. (2020). Measuring the bioeconomic impacts of prolonged drought on a lake ecosystem: The case of the Great Salt Lake, Utah. Natural Resource Modeling, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/NRM.12251
dc.relation.referencesChomkhamsri, K., Mungcharoen, T., & Yuvaniyama, C. (2016). 10-year experience with the Thainational LCI database: case study of ‘re!nery products. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(11), 1760-1770. https:// doi.org/10.1007/S11367-016-1160-3
dc.relation.referencesCosta, J., Kot, S., & Stefko, R. (2021). Carrots or Sticks: Which Policies Matter the Most in Sustainable Resource Management? Resources, 10(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10020012
dc.relation.referencesDauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., Salman, M., Boamah, K. B., Ampon-Wireko, S., & Ko! Dogbe, C. S. (2021). Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125143
dc.relation.referencesGuo, L. ling, Qu, Y., Wu, C. you, & Wang, X. ling. (2018). “Identifying a pathway towards green growth of Chinese industrial regions based on a system dynamics approach”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2016.09.035
dc.relation.referencesHaberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Brockway, P., Fishman, T., Hausknost, D., Krausmann, F., Leon-Gruchalski, B., Mayer, A., Pichler, M., Scha%artzik, A., Sousa, T., Streeck, J., & Creutzig, F. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 065003. https://doi. org/10.1088/1748-9326/AB842A
dc.relation.referencesHickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2019). Is Green Growth Possible?. New Political Economy , 25(4), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
dc.relation.referencesIslam, M., & Managi, S. (2019). Green growth and pro-environmental behavior: Sustainable resource management using natural capital accounting in India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 145, 126-138. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.027
dc.relation.referencesIvanova, Y. (2017). The Green Economy model: A promise or a reality for the Latin-American countries?. International Politics Reviews, 5, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41312-017-0021-9
dc.relation.referencesJakob, M., & Edenhofer, O. (2014). Green growth, degrowth, and the commons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 447–468. https://doi. org/10.1093/oxrep/gru026.
dc.relation.referencesJasinevicius, G., Lindner, M., Verkerk, P. J., & Aleinikovas, M. (2017). Assessing Impacts of Wood Utilisation Scenarios for a Lithuanian Bioeconomy: Impacts on Carbon in Forests and Harvested Wood Products and on the Socio-Economic Performance of the Forest- Based Sector. Forests 2017, 8(4), 133. https:// doi.org/10.3390/F8040133
dc.relation.referencesKang, M. J., & Park, H. (2011). Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3465-3475. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. ENPOL.2011.03.045
dc.relation.referencesKelleher, L., Henchion, M., & O’Neill, E. (2019). Policy coherence and the transition to a bioeconomy: The case of Ireland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/ SU11247247
dc.relation.referencesKröger, M., & Raitio, K. (2017). Finnish forest policy in the era of bioeconomy: A pathway to sustainability? Forest Policy and Economics, 77, 6-15. https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2016.12.003
dc.relation.referencesLeitão, J., Pereira, D., & de Brito, S. (2020). Inbound and Outbound Practices of Open Innovation and Eco-Innovation: Contrasting Bioeconomy and Non-Bioeconomy Firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2020, 6(4), 145. https://doi. org/10.3390/JOITMC6040145
dc.relation.referencesLi, W., & Li, D. (2012). Environmental information transparency and implications for green growth in China. Public Administration and Development, 32(3), 324-334. https://doi. org/10.1002/PAD.1626
dc.relation.referencesMarvik, O. J., & Philp, J. (2020). The systemic challenge of the bioeconomy: A policy framework for transitioning towards a sustainable carbon cycle economy. EMBO Reports, 21(10). https:// doi.org/10.15252/EMBR.202051478
dc.relation.referencesMathews, J. A. (2015). Energizing Industrial Development: The Role of the State in 21st Century Greening Strategies. Revista Do Serviço Público, 66, 29–54. https://doi.org/10.21874/RSP.V66I0.1276
dc.relation.referencesMonasterolo, I., & Raberto, M. (2019). The impact of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies on the lowcarbon transition. Energy Policy, 124, 355- 370. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2018.08.051
dc.relation.referencesMonasterolo, I., Raberto, M., Monasterolo, I., & Raberto, M. (2018). The EIRIN Flow-of-funds Behavioural Model of Green Fiscal Policies and Green Sovereign Bonds. Ecological Economics, 144(C), 228-243. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2017.07.029
dc.relation.referencesMoosmann, D., Majer, S., Ugarte, S., Ladu, L., Wurster, S., & Thrän, D. (2020). Strengths and gaps of the EU frameworks for the sustainability assessment of bio-based products and bioenergy. Energ Sustain Soc, 10(22), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00251-8
dc.relation.referencesMukhtarov, F., Gerlak, A., & Pierce, R. (2017). Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy: Knowledge versatility for public policy? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(6), 1010-1028. https://doi. org/10.1177/0263774X16676273
dc.relation.referencesMuza, O., & Debnath, R. (2021). Disruptive innovation for inclusive renewable policy in sub-Saharan Africa: A social shaping of technology analysis of appliance uptake in Rwanda. Renewable Energy, 168, 896-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. renene.2020.12.091
dc.relation.referencesÖzbugday, F. C., Fındık, D., Metin Özcan, K., & Basçı, S. (2020). Resource e%iciency investments and !rm performance: Evidence from European SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119824
dc.relation.referencesPalgan, Y. V., & McCormick, K. (2016). Biore!neries in Sweden: Perspectives on the opportunities, challenges and future. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biore!ning, 10(5), 523-533. https://doi. org/10.1002/BBB.1672
dc.relation.referencesPandey, P. C. (2020). Circular Designing and Green Growth: Insights on Future of Sustainability. SAGE Journals, 24(1), 113-117. https://doi. org/10.1177/0972262920903904
dc.relation.referencesPannell, D. J., Tillie, P., Rodríguez-Cerezo, E., Ervin, D., & Frisvold, G. B. (2016). Herbicide resistance : economic and environmental challenges. AgBioForum, 19(2), 136-155. https://mospace. umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/59578
dc.relation.referencesPark, J. (2011). The Evolution of Green Growth Policy: An Unwelcome Intrusion on Global Environmental Governance? Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, 17(2), 207-241. https://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2013.17.2.264
dc.relation.referencesPetig, E., Choi, H. S., Angenendt, E., Kremer, P., Grethe, H., & Bahrs, E. (2019). Downscaling of agricultural market impacts under bioeconomy development to the regional and the farm level—An example of Baden- Wuerttemberg. GCB Bioenergy, 11(10), 1102- 1124. https://doi.org/10.1111/GCBB.12639
dc.relation.referencesPhilippidis, G., Bartelings, H., Helming, J., M’barek, R., Smeets, E., & van Meijl, H. (2019). Levelling the playing !eld for EU biomass usage. Economic Systems Research, 31(2), 158- 177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2018.1564020/ SUPPL_FILE/CESR_A_1564020_SM1227.DOCX
dc.relation.referencesPhilippidis, G., M’Barek, R., & Ferrari, E. (2016). Is “biobased” activity a panacea for sustainable competitive growth? Energies, 9(10). https://doi. org/10.3390/en9100806
dc.relation.referencesPhilp, J. (2015). Balancing the bioeconomy: Supporting biofuels and bio-based materials in public policy. Energy and Environmental Science, 8(11), 3063-3068. https://doi.org/10.1039/ c5ee01864a
dc.relation.referencesPitkänen, K., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Aissani, L., Hansjürgens, B., Kuikman, P. J., Leskinen, P., & Thomsen, M. (2016). What can be learned from practical cases of green economy? –studies from !ve European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 666-676. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.08.071
dc.relation.referencesPurkus, A., & Lüdtke, J. (2020). A systemic evaluation framework for a multi-actor, forest-based bioeconomy governance process: The German Charter for Wood 2.0 as a case study. Forest Policy and Economics, 113, 102113. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2020.102113
dc.relation.referencesQuenault, B. (2020). Energy transition and the sustainability of development trajectories: Are we headed toward a mere marginal adjustment or a disruptive transformation? Mondes En Developpement, 192(4), 45-70. https://doi.org/10.3917/MED.192.0045
dc.relation.referencesRampasso, I. S., Quelhas, O. L. G., Anholon, R., Silva, D. A. L., Pontes, A. T., Miranda, J. D. A., & Dias, J. O. (2021). The Bioeconomy in emerging economies: a study of the critical success factors based on Life Cycle Assessment and Delphi and Fuzzy-Delphi methods. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2021, 26(6), 1254-1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/ S11367-021-01913-1
dc.relation.referencesSampaio Neto, O. Z., Batista, E. A. C., & Meirelles, A. J. de A. (2020). Potencial de oleaginosas nativas no desenvolvimento de cadeias produtivas da biodiversidade brasileira. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 54(0), 537-559. https://doi. org/10.5380/DMA.V54I0.71934
dc.relation.referencesSeidl, I., & Zahrnt, A. (2015). Social welfare politics cannot ignore growthmania. Unde!ned, 24(4), 232-235. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.24.4.6
dc.relation.referencesSmith, E., & Diggans, J. (2020). Next Steps to Grow the Bioeconomy. Health Security, 18(4), 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1089/HS.2020.0012
dc.relation.referencesSöderholm, K., Bergquist, A. K., & Söderholm, P. (2017). The transition to chlorine free pulp revisited: Nordic heterogeneity in environmental regulation and R&D collaboration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1328-1339. https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.07.190
dc.relation.referencesStahel, W. R. (2017). Analysis of the structure and values of the European Commission’s Circular Economy Package. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Waste and Resource Management, 170(1), 41-44. https:// doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.17.00009
dc.relation.referencesTeigiserova, D. A., Hamelin, L., & Thomsen, M. (2020). Towards transparent valorization of food surplus, waste and loss: Clarifying de!nitions, food waste hierarchy, and role in the circular economy. Science of The Total Environment, 706, 136033. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.136033
dc.relation.referencesToivonen, R., Vihemäki, H., & Toppinen, A. (2021). Policy narratives on wooden multi-storey construction and implications for technology innovation system governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 125, 102409. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2021.102409
dc.relation.referencesTong, C., Ding, S., Wang, B., & Yang, S. (2020). Assessing the target-availability of China’s investments for green growth using time series prediction. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 537, 122724. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122724
dc.relation.referencesVazquez-Brust, D. A., & Sarkis, J. (2012). Green growth: Managing the transition to a sustainable economy: Learning by doing in East Asia and Europe. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 007-4417-2
dc.relation.referencesVenkata Mohan, S., Dahiya, S., Amulya, K., Katakojwala, R., & Vanitha, T. K. (2019). Can circular bioeconomy be fueled by waste biore!neries - A closer look. Bioresource Technology Reports, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. BITEB.2019.100277
dc.relation.referencesWang, X., & Shao, Q. (2019). Non-linear e%ects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: Evidence from panel threshold regression. Science of the Total Environment, 660, 1346-1354. https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.01.094
dc.relation.referencesWang, Y., Hu, H., Dai, W., & Burns, K. (2021). Evaluation of industrial green development and industrial green competitiveness: Evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations. Ecological Indicators, 124, 107371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2021.107371
dc.relation.referencesZhou, Z., Wu, H., & Song, P. (2019). Measuring the resource and environmental e%iciency of industrial water consumption in China: A non-radial directional distance function. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118169
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/issue/view/290spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.sourceVol. 25 Núm. 51 (2023): Reflexión Política (enero - junio); 31-44spa
dc.subjectBioeconomíaspa
dc.subjectCrecimiento verdespa
dc.subjectPolítica públicaspa
dc.subjectRevisión sistemática de literaturaspa
dc.subjectSostenibilidadspa
dc.subjectEconomía verdespa
dc.subjectCrecimiento económicospa
dc.subject.keywordsBioeconomyeng
dc.subject.keywordsGreen growtheng
dc.subject.keywordsPublic policyeng
dc.subject.keywordsSystematic literature revieweng
dc.subject.keywordsSustainabilityeng
dc.subject.keywordsGreen economyeng
dc.subject.keywordsEconomic growtheng
dc.titleEstado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)spa
dc.title.translatedState of research on green growth from public policy perspectives (2011- 2021)eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Artículo.pdf
Tamaño:
559.67 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Artículo

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
829 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: