Comparación de la eficacia y seguridad de los tratamientos (endovascular o conservador) de pacientes con aneurismas cerebrales pequeños en Colombia en el período de 2014 al 2022

dc.contributor.advisorMantilla García, Daniel Eduardo
dc.contributor.advisorSerrano Gómez, Sergio
dc.contributor.apolounabMantilla García Daniel Eduardo [daniel-eduardo-mantilla-garcía]spa
dc.contributor.apolounabSerrano Gómez, Sergio Eduardo [sergio-eduardo-serrano-gómez]spa
dc.contributor.authorVillamizar Barahona, Ana Beatriz
dc.contributor.cvlacMantilla García, Daniel Eduardo [0001437130]spa
dc.contributor.cvlacSerrano Gómez, Sergio [0001547816]spa
dc.contributor.googlescholarMantilla García, Daniel Eduardo [es&oi=ao]spa
dc.contributor.orcidVillamizar Barahona, Ana Beatriz [0000-0003-3038-9718]spa
dc.contributor.orcidSerrano Gómez, Sergio Eduardo [0000-0001-6418-7116]spa
dc.contributor.scopusMantilla García, Daniel Eduardo [56641574500]spa
dc.contributor.scopusSerrano Gómez, Sergio Eduardo [57197758865]spa
dc.coverage.campusUNAB Campus Bucaramangaspa
dc.coverage.spatialBucaramanga (Santander, Colombia)spa
dc.coverage.spatialBogotá (Colombia)spa
dc.coverage.temporalEnero 2014 a Diciembre 2022spa
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T20:54:49Z
dc.date.available2024-01-29T20:54:49Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-26
dc.degree.nameEspecialización en Radiología Intervencionistaspa
dc.description.abstractEl registro de aneurismas cerebrales < 5 mm, conocidos por su bajo riesgo de rotura, es significativo dada su alta incidencia a nivel global. Nuestro estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar, en aneurismas pequeños (<5 mm), las posibles características morfológicas, los factores de riesgo que pueden predecir el riesgo de rotura y el riesgo o beneficio de tratarlos con tratamiento endovascular o conservador en aneurismas intracraneales rotos y no rotos. Se revisaron retrospectivamente las historias clínicas de pacientes con aneurismas cerebrales < 5 mm entre enero de 2014 y diciembre de 2022 en dos centros neurovasculares de Colombia. Evaluamos los resultados clínicos y angiográficos mediante pruebas estadísticas. En la base de datos se registraron 256 pacientes (425 aneurismas intracraneales). Se trataron 275 AI con tratamiento endovascular: 70 aneurismas rotos y 205 aneurismas no rotos. Ciento cincuenta aneurismas intracraneales fueron sometidos a tratamiento conservador (seguimiento). Las mujeres representaron el 82,12% de los casos. La mayoría de los casos fueron diagnosticados incidentalmente (83,53%). Después de un año de seguimiento, el 87,31% de los aneurismas intracraneales no rotos y el 67,14% de los rotos tenían una mRS 0-2. En la clasificación de oclusión de Raymond-Roy, entre 101 aneurismas intracraneales no rotos embolizados fueron 53 casos de clase I, y entre 66 aneurismas intracraneales rotos embolizados, el 67,14% fueron de clase I. La terapia endovascular para aneurismas < 5 mm parece ser un tratamiento técnicamente factible, con tasas de oclusión satisfactorias y pocos retratamientos a los 12 meses de seguimiento. Las tasas de complicaciones fueron similares a las informadas en estudios sobre aneurismas pequeños.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishBackground and Purpose: The registry of cerebral aneurysms < 5 mm, known for their low risk of rupture, is significant, given their high incidence globally. Our study aimed to identify, in small aneurysms (<5 mm), the potential morphological characteristics, risk factors that can predict the risk of rupture, and the risk or benefit of treating them with endovascular or conservative treatment in ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Materials and Methods: The medical records of patients with cerebral aneurysms < 5 mm were retrospectively reviewed between January 2014 and December 2022 at two neurovascular centers in Colombia. We evaluated clinical and angiographic outcomes using statistical tests. Results: Two hundred fifty-six patients (425 intracranial aneurysms) were registered in the database. Two hundred and seventy-five IA were treated with endovascular treatment: 70 ruptured aneurysms and 205 unruptured aneurysms. One hundred fifty IA underwent conservative treatment (follow-up). Women accounted for 82.12% of cases. Most cases were incidentally diagnosed (83.53%). After a year of follow-up, 87.31% of unruptured and 67.14% of ruptured intracranial aneurysms had an mRS 0-2. In the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, among 101 unruptured intracranial aneurysms embolized were 53 cases class I, and among 66 ruptured intracranial aneurysms embolized, 67.14% were class I. Conclusion: Endovascular therapy for aneurysms < 5 mm appears to be a technically feasible treatment, with satisfactory occlusion rates and few re-treatments at the 12-month follow-up. The complication rates were similar to those reported in studies on small aneurysms.spa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.learningmodalityModalidad Presencialspa
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introducción.................................................................................................................. 4 2. Formulación del problema........................................................................................ 5 a. Planteamiento del problema .................................................................................. 5 b. Pregunta................................................................................................................. 5 3. Marco teórico............................................................................................................ 5 a. Definición .............................................................................................................. 5 b. Epidemiología........................................................................................................ 5 c. Fisiopatología ........................................................................................................ 6 d. Factores de riesgo .................................................................................................. 7 e. Clasificación .......................................................................................................... 8 f. Diagnóstico............................................................................................................ 8 g. Tratamiento............................................................................................................ 9 4. Estado de arte.......................................................................................................... 10 5. Metodología............................................................................................................ 12 a. Objetivo ............................................................................................................... 12 i. General............................................................................................................. 12 ii. Objetivos específicos.................................................................................... 12 b. Tipo de estudio .................................................................................................... 13 c. Población ............................................................................................................. 13 d. Muestra ................................................................................................................ 13 e. Criterios de elegibilidad....................................................................................... 14 f. Descripción de variables...................................................................................... 14 g. Técnicas de recolección de información ............................................................. 24 h. Análisis estadístico:............................................................................................. 24 6. Consideraciones éticas:........................................................................................... 25 7. Resultados............................................................................................................... 26 8. Discusión ................................................................................................................ 35 9. Conclusión.............................................................................................................. 39spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/23314
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Radiología Intervencionistaspa
dc.publisher.programidERI-2152
dc.relation.references1. Al-Tamimi Y, Bhargava D, Feltbower R, et al. Limbar Drainage of Cerebroespinal Fluid After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial (LUMAS). Journal of the American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, Enero,2012.spa
dc.relation.references2. Texakalidis P, Bekelis K, Atallah E, et al. Flow diversion with the pipeline embolization device for patients with intracranial aneurysms and antiplatelet therapy: a systematic literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg.2017;161:78-87.spa
dc.relation.references3. Thompson BG, Brown RD Jr, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke.2015;46(8):2368-2400.spa
dc.relation.references4. David Altschul, Tarini Vats and Santiago Unda (November 15th 2019). Endovascular Treatment of Brain Aneurysms [Online First], IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88964. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/online- first/endovascular-treatment-of-brain-aneurysmsspa
dc.relation.references5. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet.2003;362(9378):103-110. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13860-3spa
dc.relation.references6. Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD Jr, et al. Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jan;13(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1. Epub 2013 Nov 27. PMID: 24290159.spa
dc.relation.references7. Andaluz N, van Loveren HR, Keller JT, et al. Anatomic and clinical study of the orbitopterional approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2003;52:1140–8. discussion 1148–9.spa
dc.relation.references8. Vera DD, Cardenas SA, Ortiz AF, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Coils and Non-Flow-Diverting Stents for the Management of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Location-Specific Outcomes Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2023 Dec 9:S1878-8750(23)01749-7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.028. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38081582.spa
dc.relation.references9. David Altschul, Tarini Vats and Santiago Unda (November 15th 2019). Endovascular Treatment of Brain Aneurysms [Online First], IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88964. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/online- first/endovascular-treatment-of-brain-aneurysmsspa
dc.relation.references10. Brown RD, Jr, Broderick JP. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Epidemiology, natural history, management options, and familial screening. Lancet Neurol.2014;13:393–404.spa
dc.relation.references11. Weir B, Disney L, Karrison T. Sizes of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in relation to their sites and the ages of patients. J Neurosurgery.2002;96:64-70.spa
dc.relation.references12. David Altschul, Tarini Vats and Santiago Unda (November 15th 2019). Endovascular Treatment of Brain Aneurysms [Online First], IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88964. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/online- first/endovascular-treatment-of-brain-aneurysmsspa
dc.relation.references13. Yamaki VN, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, et al. Endovascular Treatment of Very Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Meta-Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 May;37(5):862-7. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4651. Epub 2015 Dec 31. PMID: 26721770; PMCID: PMC7960320.spa
dc.relation.references14. UCAS Japan Investigators, Morita A, Kirino T, et al. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(26):2474-2482. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113260spa
dc.relation.references15. L. Pierot L. Spelle F. Vitry. ATENA: The first prospective, multicentric evaluation of the endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Journal of Neuroradiology (2008) 35, 67—70.spa
dc.relation.references16. Dmytriw, Adam A MD, MSc; Salem, Mohamed M MD; Yang, Victor X D MD, et al. Endosaccular Flow Disruption: A New Frontier in Endovascular Aneurysm Management. Neurosurgery 86(2):p 170-181, February 2020. | DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz017spa
dc.relation.references17. Carter BS, Sheth S, Chang E, et al. Epidemiology of the size distribution of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms: smaller size of distal aneurysms and increasing size of unruptured aneurysms with age. Neurosurgery.2006;58:217- 223.spa
dc.relation.references18. Korja M, Lehto H, Juvela S. Lifelong rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms depends on risk factors: a prospective Finnish cohort study. Stroke.2014;45(7):1958-1963. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005318spa
dc.relation.references19. Mocco J, Brown RD Jr, Torner JC, et al. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Aneurysm Morphology and Prediction of Rupture: An International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Analysis. Neurosurgery. 2018 Apr 1;82(4):491-496. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx226.spa
dc.relation.references20. A Meta-Analysis of Rupture Risk for Intracranial Aneurysms 10 mm or Less in Size Selected for Conservative Management Without Repair | Request PDF [Internet]. ResearchGate. [cited 2022 Feb 28]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358693004_A_Meta-Analysis_of_Rupture_Risk_for_Intracranial_Aneurysms_10_mm_or_Less_in_Size_Selected_for_Conservative_Management_Without_Repairspa
dc.relation.uriapolohttps://apolo.unab.edu.co/en/persons/daniel-eduardo-mantilla-garc%C3%ADaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordsMedical sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsHealth sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsRadiologyspa
dc.subject.keywordsDiagnostic imagingspa
dc.subject.keywordsEndovascular Aneurysm Repairspa
dc.subject.keywordsIntracranial aneurysmspa
dc.subject.keywordsConservative treatmentspa
dc.subject.keywordsAneurysm, Rupturedspa
dc.subject.keywordsSubarachnoid hemorrhagespa
dc.subject.keywordsVascular diseasesspa
dc.subject.keywordsCerebrovascular disordersspa
dc.subject.keywordsCerebral angiographyspa
dc.subject.lembCiencias médicasspa
dc.subject.lembRadiologíaspa
dc.subject.lembDiagnóstico para imágenesspa
dc.subject.lembEnfermedades vascularesspa
dc.subject.lembTrastornos cerebrovascularesspa
dc.subject.lembAngiografía cerebralspa
dc.subject.proposalCiencias de la saludspa
dc.subject.proposalHemorragia subaracnoideaspa
dc.subject.proposalAneurisma intracranealspa
dc.subject.proposalTerapia endovascular de aneurismaspa
dc.subject.proposalTratamiento conservativospa
dc.subject.proposalAneurisma, rupturaspa
dc.titleComparación de la eficacia y seguridad de los tratamientos (endovascular o conservador) de pacientes con aneurismas cerebrales pequeños en Colombia en el período de 2014 al 2022spa
dc.title.translatedComparison of the efficacy and safety of treatments (endovascular or conservative) of patients with small cerebral aneurysms in Colombia in the period from 2014 to 2022spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Tesis.pdf
Tamaño:
909.98 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Draft_Proof_hi.pdf
Tamaño:
225.26 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión sometida a revisión
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Licencia.pdf
Tamaño:
277.3 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Licencia

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
829 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: