Análisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financiera

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorCarrillo, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorValencia Calle, Alvaro
dc.contributor.authorSarmiento Soto, Carlos Mario
dc.contributor.cvlacValencia Calle, Álvaro [0000148833]spa
dc.coverage.campusUNAB Campus Bucaramangaspa
dc.coverage.spatialBogotá (Cundinamarca, Colombia)spa
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-15T20:28:20Z
dc.date.available2024-08-15T20:28:20Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.degree.nameMagíster en en Ciencias Computacionalesspa
dc.description.abstractEl propósito del presente trabajo es conocer el marco conceptual del desarrollo de los Servicios Web Semánticos y su evolución desde las dificultades de la Web actual y los servicios Web tradicionales para comprender el desarrollo de una nueva generación de lenguajes de marcado ontológico como son OWL-S, WSMO y METEOR-S. Comentaremos los elementos conceptuales de cada una de estas iniciativas y la forma en que superan las limitaciones de los servicios Web para convertirse en soluciones integrales y ser vistos como la siguiente generación de Internet. Se aplicó un modelo experimental a través del desarrollo de dos prototipos enmarcados en ámbito financiero colombiano, el primero utilizando servicios Web convencionales y, el segundo utilizando servicios Web semánticos específicamente la descripción WSMO.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe purpose of this paper is to understand the conceptual framework for the development of Semantic Web Services and their evolution from the difficulties of the current Web and traditional Web services to understand the development of a new generation of ontological markup languages ​​such as OWL-S, WSMO and METEOR-S. We will discuss the conceptual elements of each of these initiatives and the way in which they overcome the limitations of Web services to become comprehensive solutions and be seen as the next generation of the Internet. An experimental model was applied through the development of two prototypes framed in the Colombian financial field, the first using conventional Web services and the second using semantic Web services, specifically the WSMO description.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.learningmodalityModalidad Presencialspa
dc.description.sponsorshipInstituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM)spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsÍNDICE DE FIGURAS .......................................................... iv ÍNDICE DE TABLAS ............................................................. v 1. INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS ...................................... 1 2. MARCO TEÓRICO............................................................ 7 2.1. La Web Semántica .............................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Introducción. ................................................................................................... 8 2.1.2. La Web Actualmente. ................................................................................. 10 2.1.3. La Web Semántica. ................................................................................... 10 2.1.4. Ontologías ................................................................................................... 12 2.1.5. Tecnologías para la web semántica. ........................................................ 18 2.1.5.1. XML .......................................................................................................... 18 2.1.5.2. RDF .......................................................................................................... 20 2.1.5.3. RDFS ....................................................................................................... 21 2.1.5.4. OIL ........................................................................................................... 22 2.1.5.5. DAML ....................................................................................................... 23 2.1.5.6. DAML+OIL................................................................................................ 24 2.1.5.7. OWL .......................................................................................................... 25 2.1.6 Evolución de la web actual a la web semántica ....................................... 29 2.2. SERVICIOS WEB .............................................................................................. 31 2.2.1. SOAP ........................................................................................................... 33 2.2.1.1 Comunicación a través de intermediarios .............................................. 36 2.2.1.2 Herramientas para la creación y manipulación de mensajes SOAP ... 37 2.2.2 WSDL ................................................................................................................ 38 2.2.3 UDDI ................................................................................................................. 42 2.2.3.1 Herramientas ............................................................................................. 45 2.3 Servicios de Web Semántica ............................................................................ 46 2.3.1 OWL-S: Marcado Semántico para Servicios Web ....................................... 50 2.3.1.1. Service Profile .......................................................................................... 52 2.3.1.2. Service Model .......................................................................................... 56 2.3.1.2.1. Process Model .................................................................................. 57 2.3.1.2.2. Control Model .................................................................................... 59 2.3.1.3. Service Grounding ............................................................................... 60 2.3.1.3.1 La relación entre OWL-S y WSDL ................................................... 60 2.3.1.3.2 Grounding de un servicio OWL-S con WSDL y SOAP .................. 63 2.3.1.3.3. La Clase DAML-S Grounding .......................................................... 64 2.3.2 LENGUAJES OWL-S .................................................................................. 65 2.4 WEB SERVICES MODELLING ONTOLOGY: WSMO .. 66 2.4.1 DESCRIPCIÓN WSMO .............................................................................. 68 2.4.2 CARACTERÍSTICAS ................................................................................... 69 2.4.3 PRINCIPIO DE DESACOPLAMIENTO .................................................... 72 2.4.4 El lenguaje WSML ....................................................................................... 75 2.5 METEOR-S (Managing End-To-End OpeRations) ...... 83 2.5.1 Anotación Semántica de Servicios Web .................................................... 84 2.5.2 Infraestructura de Descubrimiento Semántico para Servicios Web (MWSDI: METEOR-S Web Services Discovery Infraestructure) ...................... 85 2.5.2.1 Capa de Datos: ..................................................................................... 87 2.5.2.2 Capa de Especificaciones Semánticas: ............................................. 87 2.5.2.3 Capa de Comunicaciones: ................................................................... 87 2.5.2.4 Capa de Operador de Servicios: ......................................................... 88 2.5.3 Composición Semántica de Servicios Web (MWSCF: METEOR-S Web Service Composition Framework) ........................................................................ 88 2.5.3.1 Proceso Constructor ................................................................................. 89 2.5.3.1.1 Especificando una actividad utilizando una Implementación de Servicios Web .................................................................................................... 89 2.5.3.1.2 Especificando una actividad utilizando una Interface de Servicios Web ..................................................................................................................... 90 2.5.3.1.3 Especificando una actividad utilizando una Plantilla Semántica .. 90 2.5.3.2 Repositorios XML: .................................................................................... 90 2.5.3.3 Maquina de Ejecución: ............................................................................. 91 2.5.4 Características de MWSCF ....................................................................... 92 3. METODOLOGÍA ............................................................. 93 3.1 ELABORACIÓN DE PROTOTIPOS ................................................................. 95 3.1.1 Introducción: ................................................................................................. 95 3.1.2 Descripción del Servicio .............................................................................. 96 3.1.3 Especificación información Financiera reportada por los Bancos a Datacrédito ............................................................................................................. 97 3.2 CONSTRUCCIÓN PROTOTIPO SERVICIO WEB DATACREDITO ............102 3.2.1 Arquitectura de Web Services .................................................................. 103 3.2.2 Diagrama de Arquitectura ......................................................................... 104 3.2.3 DIAGRAMA DE CLASES .......................................................................... 108 3.3 CONSTRUCCIÓN PROTOTIPO SERVICIO WEB SEMANTICO WSMO ...111 3.3.1 Construcción Ontología ............................................................................ 111 3.3.2 Construcción de Goal ................................................................................ 112 3.3.3 Construcción de Capability ....................................................................... 113 3.3.4 Descubrimiento .......................................................................................... 114 3.3.4.1 Descripción de arquitectura de descubrimiento y proceso ............. 115 3.3.4.2 Adaptación de anotaciones de QoS Discovery component para utilizar las Ontologías construidas. ............................................................ 119 4. ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO OWL-S WSMO Y METEOR-S .......................................................................................... 121 4.1 Introducción: .......................................................................................................121 iii 4.2 COMPARACIÓN OWL-S y WSMO ..................................................................121 4.2.1 OWL-S Service ...............................................................................................123 4.2.2 OWL-S Service Profile ...................................................................................124 4.2.2.1 Cardinalidad Profile. ............................................................................... 125 4.2.2.2 Jerarquía Profile ..................................................................................... 125 4.2.2.3 Servicio nombre, contacto, descripción y categoría. .......................... 127 4.2.2.4 Parámetros de Profile............................................................................. 127 4.2.2.5 Descripción de la Funcionalidad ........................................................... 128 4.2.3 OWL-S Service Model ....................................................................................133 4.2.3.1 Modelo De Cardinalidad ........................................................................ 133 4.2.3.2 Descripción de la Funcionalidad .......................................................... 134 4.2.3.3 Participantes ........................................................................................... 135 4.2.3.4 Profile / Modelo de Consistencia ......................................................... 135 4.2.3.5 Procesos atómicos ................................................................................. 135 4.2.3.6 Procesos Simples ................................................................................... 136 4.2.3.7 Procesos compuestos ............................................................................ 136 4.2.4 Los OWL-S Servicio Grounding ....................................................................138 4.2.4.1 Grounding Cardinalidad ......................................................................... 138 4.2.4.2 Definición Grounding .............................................................................. 139 4.2.5 Lenguajes Lógicos ..........................................................................................140 4.2.5.1 Lenguaje de WSMO ............................................................................... 140 4.2.5.2 LENGUAJES OWL-S ............................................................................. 141 4.2.5.3 LENGUAJE UTILIZADO EN METEOR-S: ........................................... 142 4.2.6 TABLA RESUMEN DE COMPARACIÓN .....................................................144 5. CONCLUSIONES Y TRABAJO FUTURO ..................... 146 6. BIBLIOGRAFÍA ............................................................ 149 Anexo A ........................................................................... 160 Anexo B ...........................................................................162spa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/26049
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ingenieríaspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Ciencias Computacionalesspa
dc.relation.referencesAggarwal R., Sivashanmugam K., Rajasekaran P., Miller J., K., Verma K., Sheth A. ”WSDL-S: A Proposal to W3C WSDL 2.0 Commite.”LSDIS Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia. Atenas http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/Projects/METEOR-S/spa
dc.relation.referencesAguado G., Bateman J., Bañón A., Bernardos S., Fernández M., Gómez-Pérez A., Nieto E., Olalla A., Plaza R. y Sánchez A. “ONTOGENERATION: Reusing Domain andLinguistic Ontologies for Spanish”. Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and PSMs.mEuropean Conference of Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’98). Págs. 1-10. Brighton. Reino Unido. 1998.spa
dc.relation.referencesAkkiraju R, Goodwin R, Doshi R, and Roeder S. A Method for Semantically Enhancing the Service Discovery Capabilities of UDDI.In Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Integration on the Web, IJCAI 2003, Aug 9-10, 2003.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlesso, H. P., Smith, C.F. (2004). “Developing Semantic Web Services”. Wellesey MA, Ed. Sales and Customer Services Office.spa
dc.relation.referencesArpírez J., Gómez-Pérez A., Lozano Tello A. and Pinto S. “Reference Ontology and (Onto)2Agent: The Ontology Yellow Pages”, Knowledge and Information Systems, An International Journal, Springer-Verlag, 2(2000) 4, 387-412. Mar. 2000.spa
dc.relation.referencesArpírez J., Corcho O., Ferández-López M. y Gómez-Pérez A. “WebODE: a Workbench for Ontological Engineering”. First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (KCAP’01). Victoria B.C. Canada. 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesThe AlertSite Website. http://www.alertsite.com.spa
dc.relation.referencesBateman J., Kasper T., Moore J. y Whitney R. “A General Organization of Knowledge form Natural Language Processing: The Penman Upper Model”. Technical Report, USC/ISI. Marina del Rey, CA (USA), 1990.spa
dc.relation.referencesBateman J. “KPML: The KOMET-Penman (Multilingual) Development Environment”. Technical Report, GMD/IPSI. Darmstadt. Germany. 1994.spa
dc.relation.referencesBateman J.A., Magnini B. y Fabris G. “The Generalized Upper Model Knowledge Base: Organization and Use”. Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases. IOS Press. Págs. 60-72. 1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesBechhofer S. “OilEd University of Manchester”. Presentación en OntoWeb Workshop. Universal Ontology Editor Workshop. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. The Netherlands.Febrero. 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesBenatallah B, Hacid M, Leger A, Rey C, and Toumani F. On automating web services discovery. The VLDB Journal, 14(1):84{96, 2005.spa
dc.relation.referencesBenjamins R., Decker S., Fensel D., Motta E., Plaza E., Schreiber G., Studer R. Y Wielinga B. “IBROW3 An Intelligent Brokering Service for Knowledge-Component Reuse on the World-Wide Web”. Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and PSMs. (ECAI’98). Págs. 25-30. Brigthton, Reino Unido. 1998.spa
dc.relation.referencesBerners-Lee T., Hendler J. y Lassila O. “The Semantic Web”. Scientific American. vol. no.5. Págs 34-43. Mayo, 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesBilgin A.and Singh M. A DAML-based repository for QoS-aware semantic web service selection. In ICWS '04: Proceedings of the 151 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'04), page 368, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorst P., Benjamins J., Wielinga B. y Akkermans H. “An Application of Ontology Construction”. Workshop on Ontological Engineering. European Conference of Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’96). Págs. 5-16. Budapest. 1996.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorst W. “Construction of Engieneering Ontologies”. Tesis Doctoral. University of Twente. Enschede. 1997.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrickley D. Y Guha R. “Resource Description Framework (RDF). Schema Specification”. W3C Proposed Recommendations. Marzo, 1999. (http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdfschema).spa
dc.relation.referencesBurnstein, M., Bussler, C., Finn, T., Huhns, M., Paolucci, M., A semantic Web Services Arquitecture. Internet Computing, IEEE Volume 9, Sep-Oct 2005.spa
dc.relation.referencesCardoso, J., Sheth A. “Semantic Web Service and Web Process Composition”: Springer-Verlag New York, LLC, 2001spa
dc.relation.referencesCardoso, J., Sheth A. “Semantic e- Workflow Composition” Journal of Intelligent Inormation Systems (JIIS). .21(3) 191- 225 (2003).spa
dc.relation.referencesChen Z., Liang-Tien C., Silverajan B., and Bu-Sung L.. UX - an architecture providing QoS-aware and federated support for UDDI. In ICWS '03:Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'03), 2003.spa
dc.relation.referencesChristensen E., Curbera F., Meredith G., Weerawarana S., “WEB SERVICES DESCRIPTION LANGUAJE (WSDL) 1.1” World Wide Web Consortium - W3C. 2001.http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315/.spa
dc.relation.referencesCoalition W.N. “Workflow Management Coalition”. 1999. (http://www.aiim.org/wfmc/mainframe.htm).spa
dc.relation.referencesUniversitat de Valencia, Instituto de Robótica “CONCEPTO DE SERVICIO WEB SEMANTICOS (SWS)” http://robotica.uv.es/tesis/javi/info.html.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavies J., Fensel D. and Harmelen F. "Towards the Semantic Web". Ed. Wiley. 2002.spa
dc.relation.referencesDay J.and Deters R. Selecting the best web service. In Proceedings of the IBM Centers for Advanced Study Conference (CASCON '04), pages 293-308, 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesThe Dot-Comm Monitor Website. http://www.dotcom-monitor.com/.spa
dc.relation.referencesDean M., Connolly D., van Harmelen F., Hendler J., Horrocks I., McGuinness D., Patel-Schneider P. and Stein L. “OWL Web Ontology Language 1.0 Reference”. W3C Working Draft 29 July 2002.spa
dc.relation.referencesDobson G.. Quality of Service in Service-Oriented Architectures. http://digs.sourceforge.net/papers/qos.html, 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesDomínguez J. “Tadzebao and WebOnto: Discussing, Browsing, and Editing Ontologies on the Web”. Proceedings of te 11th Knowledge Adquisition Workshop. (KAW’98) Editado por B. Gaines and M. Musen. Banff, Canada. Abril, 1998.spa
dc.relation.referencesEmekci F., Sahin O., Agrawal D., and Abbadi A... A peer-to-peer framework for web service discovery with ranking. In ICWS '04: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'04), page 192, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.spa
dc.relation.referencesFarquhar A., Fikes R. Y Rice J. “The Ontolingua Server: A Tool for Collaborative Ontology Construction”. Proceedings of the 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledgebased Systems Workshop, vol. 19, págs. 1-44. Banff. Alberta. Canada. 1996.spa
dc.relation.referencesFensel D. “Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce”. ISBN: 3-540-41602-1. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York. 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesFensel D., Decker S., Erdman M. y Studer R. “Ontobroker: The Very High Idea”. Proceedings of the 11th International Flairs Conference (FLAIRS’98). Sanibal Island. Florida. Mayo, 1998.spa
dc.relation.referencesFerier C., Domingue J., “D3.1 V0.1 WSMO PRIMER – WSMO Final Draft” The Web Service Modeling Ontology – WSMO Working Group Digital Enterprise Research Intitute, DERI, Ireland( 2005). http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d3/d3.1/v0.1/200504/.spa
dc.relation.referencesFernández López M. “Overview of Methodologies for Building Ontologies”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’99. Workshop on Ontologies and PSMs. Stockholm. Sweden. Agosto,1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesGannod, G., Brodir, R., Timm, J. An iteractive Approach for specifying OWL-S Grounding. Computer Society, IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference, 2005.spa
dc.relation.referencesGenesereth M. y Fikes R. “Knowledge Interchange Format, version 3.0, Reference Manual”. Technical Report. Logic-92-86. Computer Science Department. Stanford University. California. USA. 1992.spa
dc.relation.referencesGibrán, H. Manejo de Ontologías en sistemas multiagentes por medio de agente de ontologías aplicado a jitik. Tesis de Maestría, ITESM, Campus Monterrey, Mayo 2003spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Pérez A. y Benjamins R. “Applications of Ontologies and Problem-solving Methods”. AI Magazine vol.20, no.1. Págs. 119-122. 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesGruber, T.R. “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification”. Knowledge Acquisition. vol. 5: 199-220, 1993.spa
dc.relation.referencesGruber, T. y Olsen R. “An Ontology for Engineering Mathematics”. Technical Report KSL-94-18. Knowledge Systems Laboratory. Stanford University. California. USA. 1994.spa
dc.relation.referencesGruninger M. y Fox M. “Methodology for the Desing and Evaluation of Ontologies”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’95. Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing. Montreal. Canada.1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeflin J., Hendler J. y Luke S. “Applying Ontology on the Web: A Case Study”. Workshop Putting Intelligence in the Web. 5th International Work-Conference on Artificial and Natural Neural Networks (IWANN’99). Págs. 715-724. Alicante. España. 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesHorroks I., Fensel D., Harmelen F., Decker S., Erdmann M. y Klein M. “OIL in a Nutshell”. Workshop on Applications of Ontologies an PSMs. European Conference of Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’00). Págs. 73-77. Berlin. Germany. Agosto, 2000.spa
dc.relation.referencesHorroks I. y van Harmelen F. “Reference Description of DAML+OIL Ontology Markup Language”. Draft Report. 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesKarp R., Chaundhri V. Y Thomere J. “XOL: An XML-Based Ontology Exchange Language”. Technical Report. Artificial Intelligence Center. SRI International. Agosto, 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesKifer M., Lausen G. y Wu J. “Logical Foundations of Object-Oriented and Frame-Based Languages”. Journal of the ACM, vol.42, nº.4. Págs. 741-843. Julio, 1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesKogut P., Holmes W. “AeroDAML: Applying Information Extraction to Generate DAML Annotations from Web Pages”. First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001) Workshop on Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation, Victoria, B.C. October 21, 2001.spa
dc.relation.referencesLassila O. Y Swick R. “Resource Description Framework (RDF). Model and Syntax Specification”. W3C Recommendations. Enero, 1999. (http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdfsyntax).spa
dc.relation.referencesLenat D. Y Guha R.V. “Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project”. Ed: Addison- Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. California. USA. 1990.spa
dc.relation.referencesLozano A. “Métrica de Idoneidad de Ontologías”. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Extremadura. Febrero, 2002.spa
dc.relation.referencesLuke S. Y Heflin J. “SHOE 1.01. Proposed Specification”. SHOE Project. Febrero 2000. (http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/SHOE/spec1.01.htm).spa
dc.relation.referencesMETEOR-S http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/METEOR-Sspa
dc.relation.referencesMcGregor R. “Inside the LOOM classifier”. SIGART bulletin #2(3). Págs. 70-76. Junio, 1991.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller G. “WORDNET: an Online Lexical Database”. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4). Págs. 235-312. 1990.spa
dc.relation.referencesMotta E. “Reusable Components for Knowledge Modelling”. IOS Press. Amsterdam, 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesOntologías. http://www.ontology.org/spa
dc.relation.referencesWeb-ontology language (owl). http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/spa
dc.relation.referencesOWL Web Ontology language: Overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/owlfeatures/spa
dc.relation.referencesPatil A., Oundhakar S., Sheth A., Verma K. METEOR-S Web Service Annotation Framework. LSDIS Lab, The University of Georgia. 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesPreece A., Hui K. y Gray P. “KRAFT: Supporting Virtual Organizations Throught Knowledge Fusion. Architecture for Knowledge Fusion and Transformation”. Artificial Intelligence for Electronic Commerce: Papers from the AAAI-99 Workshop. Editado por T Finin & B Grosof. AAAI Press. Págs. 33-38. 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesThe Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System Disponible en: http://protege.stanford.edu/spa
dc.relation.referencesRajasekaran P., Miller J., Sheth A., Verma K., Enhancing Web Services Description and Discovery to Facilitate Composition. LSDIS Lab, The University of Georgia. 2003.spa
dc.relation.referencesRajasekaran P., Miller J., K., Verma K., Sheth A. Enhancing Web Services Description and Discovery to Facilitate Composition LSDIS Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia. Atenas 2005spa
dc.relation.referencesResource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF/spa
dc.relation.referencesRoman D., Lausen H., Keller U., “D2 v 02 Web Service Modeling Ontology – WSMO - Standar – WSMO Working Draft ” The Web Service Modeling Ontology – WSMO Working Group. Digital Enterprise Research Intitute, DERI, Ireland( 2004). http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d2/v02/20040306/.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoman D., Keller U., Lausen H., Brujjn J., Lara R., Stollberg M,. Polleres A., Feier C., Bussler C., Fensel D. Web Service Modeling Ontology. DERI Innsbruck, DERI Galway. 2005.spa
dc.relation.referencesRosner D. “Generating Multilingual Documents from a Knowledge Base: The TechDoc Project”. Technical Report, FAW Ulm. Ulm. Germany. 1994.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchreiber A., Wielinga B. y Jansweijer W. “The KACTUS View on the ‘O’ Word”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’95. Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing. Montreal. Canada. 1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesSivashanmugam K., Verma K., Sheth A. Adding Semantics to Web Services Standards. 1st International Conference on Web Services, Junio 2003.spa
dc.relation.referencesSivashanmugam K., Verma K., Sheth A. Framework for Semantic Web Process Composition. International Journal of Electronic Commerce (IJEC), Special Issue on Semantic Web Services and their Role in Enterprise Aplication Integration and E-Commerce.Mayo 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesSivashanmugam K., Verma K., Sheth A., Patil A,. METEOR-S WSDI: A Scalable P2P Infraestructure of Registries for Semantic Publication and Discovery of Web Services. LSDIS Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia. Atenas 2005.spa
dc.relation.referencesStaab S. y Maedche A. “Ontology Engineering Beyond the Modeling of Concepts and Relations”. Proceedings of the ECAI’00. Workshop on Applications on Ontologies and PSMs. Berlin. Agosto. 2000.spa
dc.relation.referencesStollberg, M., Haller, A. Semantic Web Services Tutorial. Services Computing, 2005 IEEE International Conference On Volume 2spa
dc.relation.referencesStock O., Carenini G., Cecconi F., Franconi E., Lavelli A., Magnini B., Pianesi F., Ponzi M., Samek V.y Strapparava C. “Alfresco: Enjoying the Combinational of Natural Processing and Hypermedia for Information Exploration”. Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, c9. Editado por Mark Maybury. The MIT Press. Págs. 197-224. 1993.spa
dc.relation.referencesStuder, R.; Benjamins, R. and Fensel, D. “Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods”. DKE 25(1-2).pp:161-197. 1998.spa
dc.relation.referencesStuder S., Benjamins R. Y Fensel D. “Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods”. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 25, 161- 197, 1998.spa
dc.relation.referencesThe Empirix Website. http://www.empirix.com.spa
dc.relation.referencesUschold M. y Grüninger M. “Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications”. Knowledge Engineering Review, vol.2, Págs. 93-155. Junio. 1996.spa
dc.relation.referencesUschold M. y Jasper R. “A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’99. Workshop on Ontologies and PSMs. Stockholm. Sweden. Agosto, 1999.spa
dc.relation.referencesvan Heist G., Schreiber A. y Wielinga B. “Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development”. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 45. Págs. 183- 292. 1997.spa
dc.relation.referencesW3C Semantic Web.2001 http://www.w3.org/2001/2001/sw/spa
dc.relation.referencesWeb Services Architecture W3C Working Group Note 11 February 2004.spa
dc.relation.references“Web Services Choreography Interface (WSCI) 1.0 Specification” disponible en: ftp://ftpna2.bea.com/pub/downloads/wsci-spec-10.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesWeb Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language, W3C Working Draft 3spa
dc.relation.referencesWeb Service Execution Environment Website. http://www.wsmx.org/.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeb Services Flow Language (WSFL). Disponible en: http://www- 306.ibm.com/software/solutions/webservices/pdf/WSFL.spa
dc.relation.referencesApache WSIF. Disponible en: http://ws.apache.org/wsif/. Última visita noviembre 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesWSML homepage http://www.wsmo.org/wsmlspa
dc.relation.referencesWeb Service Modeling Ontology version 1.1 http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d2/v1.1/.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeb Service Modeling Ontology API for Java Website. http://wsmo4j.sourceforge.net/.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeb Service Modeling Ontology version 1.2. http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d2/v1.2/20050413/.spa
dc.relation.referencesWSMO Working Group http://www.wsmo.org/spa
dc.relation.referencesZaremba M., Haller A., Zaremba M., Moran M., “WSMXINFRASTRUCTURE FOR EXECUTION OF SEMANTIC WEB SERVICES” Digital Enterprise Research Intitute, DERI, Ireland ( 2004). Disponible en http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordsComputer sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsSystems engineerspa
dc.subject.keywordsSemantic webspa
dc.subject.keywordsSearch enginesspa
dc.subject.keywordsWeb portalsspa
dc.subject.keywordsArchitecture diagramspa
dc.subject.keywordsProgramming languages ​​(Electronic computers)spa
dc.subject.keywordsElectronic data processingspa
dc.subject.keywordsDocument markup languagesspa
dc.subject.keywordsPrototype developmentspa
dc.subject.lembCiencias computacionalesspa
dc.subject.lembIngeniería de sistemasspa
dc.subject.lembLenguajes de programación (Computadores electrónicos)spa
dc.subject.lembProcesamiento electrónico de datosspa
dc.subject.lembLenguajes de marcadospa
dc.subject.lembDesarrollo de prototiposspa
dc.subject.proposalWeb semánticaspa
dc.subject.proposalMotores de búsquedaspa
dc.subject.proposalPortales webspa
dc.subject.proposalDiagrama de arquitecturaspa
dc.titleAnálisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financieraspa
dc.title.translatedComparative analysis of languages ​​for the development of semantic web services for financial informationspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
bd00001261.pdf
Tamaño:
2.49 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
829 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Ciencias Computacionales