Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asférico

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorTello Hernández, Alejandro
dc.contributor.advisorGalvis Ramírez, Virgilio
dc.contributor.apolounabTello Hernández, Alejandro [alejandro-tello-hernández]spa
dc.contributor.apolounabGalvis Ramírez, Virgilio [virgilio-galvis-ramirez]spa
dc.contributor.authorCianci Peñaranda, Marcela Fernanda
dc.contributor.cvlacTello Hernández, Alejandro [0001009125]spa
dc.contributor.cvlacGalvis Ramírez, Virgilio [0000552453]spa
dc.contributor.googlescholarTello Hernández, Alejandro [puxZHKYAAAAJ]spa
dc.contributor.orcidTello Hernández, Alejandro [0000-0001-5081-0720]spa
dc.contributor.researchgateGalvis Ramírez, Virgilio [Virgilio_Galvis]spa
dc.contributor.scopusTello Hernández, Alejandro [6603664598]spa
dc.contributor.scopusGalvis Ramírez, Virgilio [55963715000]spa
dc.coverage.campusUNAB Campus Bucaramangaspa
dc.coverage.spatialFloridablanca (Santander, Colombia)spa
dc.coverage.temporal2022spa
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-17T20:58:18Z
dc.date.available2023-01-17T20:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.degree.nameEspecialista en Oftalmologíaspa
dc.description.abstractLa catarata (33%) y los errores refractivos no corregidos (42%) son las principales causas de ceguera prevenible en el mundo según estadísticas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) en 2010(1). Así mismo, la discapacidad visual está presente en mayor número en las personas mayores de 50 años, grupo en el que es especialmente prevalente la catarata. La catarata se describe como la opacificación del cristalino y la más común de ellas es la catarata senil, que se desarrolla a partir de la sexta década de la vida. A medida que se desarrolla la opacificación del cristalino, la agudeza visual empieza a disminuir paulatinamente, y de no frenarse, puede limitar la visión de manera tan importante que modifica el estilo y la calidad de vida del paciente, considerándose una discapacidad visual. Al no existir un tratamiento médico, su única alternativa de tratamiento es quirúrgica, removiendo la catarata e implantando en su lugar un lente intraocular (LIO) devolviendo así la transparencia de los medios, e idealmente, logrando un equivalente esférico neutro. El desarrollo y la evolución de las técnicas quirúrgicas han llevado, así mismo, a un crecimiento acelerado en el desarrollo de lentes intraoculares que, hoy por hoy, brindan una gran satisfacción visual a los pacientes. Para lograr esto, es necesario tener en cuenta un gran número de factores, desde los inherentes al paciente y su anatomía, expectativas visuales, defectos refractivos previos, pasando por el equipo a utilizar, los insumos, y entre ellos, los lentes intraoculares (LIOs).spa
dc.description.abstractenglishCataract (33%) and uncorrected refractive errors (42%) are the main causes of preventable blindness in the world according to statistics from the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2010(1). Likewise, visual impairment is present in greater numbers in people over 50 years of age, a group in which cataracts are especially prevalent. The cataract is described as the opacification of the lens and the most common of them is the senile cataract, which develops from the sixth decade of life. As lens opacification develops, visual acuity begins to gradually decrease, and if not stopped, it can limit vision so significantly that it modifies the patient's style and quality of life, being considered a visual impairment. In the absence of medical treatment, their only treatment alternative is surgery, removing the cataract and implanting an intraocular lens (IOL) in its place, thus restoring the transparency of the media, and ideally, achieving a neutral spherical equivalent. The development and evolution of surgical techniques have also led to an accelerated growth in the development of intraocular lenses that, today, provide great visual satisfaction to patients. To achieve this, it is necessary to take into account a large number of factors, from those inherent to the patient and their anatomy, visual expectations, previous refractive errors, going through the equipment to be used, supplies, and among them, intraocular lenses (IOLs). ).spa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.learningmodalityModalidad Presencialspa
dc.description.tableofcontentsResúmen del proyecto: .................................................................................................. 4 1. Justificación: ......................................................................................................... 10 2. Marco teórico: ...................................................................................................... 11 3. Estado del Arte: .................................................................................................... 16 4. Objetivos .............................................................................................................. 18 4.1 Objetivo General:............................................................................................. 18 4.2 Objetivos Especificos: ...................................................................................... 18 5. Metodología ......................................................................................................... 18 5.1 Tipo de estudio ................................................................................................ 18 5.2 Población ........................................................................................................ 18 5.3 Criterios de inclusión ....................................................................................... 18 5.4 Criterios de exclusión ...................................................................................... 19 5.5 Calculo de tamaño de muestra ........................................................................ 19 5.6 Muestreo ........................................................................................................ 19 5.7 Recolección de la información ......................................................................... 19 5.8 Variables ......................................................................................................... 20 5.9.Plan de análisis de datos ................................................................................. 31 5.10 Consideraciones éticas................................................................................... 31 6. Resultados esperados ........................................................................................... 32 6.1 Relacionados con la generación de nuevo conocimiento .................................. 32 6.2 Conducentes al fortalecimiento de la capacidad científica institucional ............ 33 6.3 Dirigidos a la apropiación social del conocimiento ........................................... 33 7. Impactos esperados a partir del uso de los resultados ........................................... 34 8. Resultados ............................................................................................................ 35 9. Discusión .............................................................................................................. 44 10. Conclusiones ......................................................................................................... 46 11. Referencias bibliográficas ..................................................................................... 48 Anexos ........................................................................................................................ 51 ANEXO 1 ...................................................................................................................... 51 Cronograma de Actividades ......................................................................................... 51 ANEXO 2 ...................................................................................................................... 51 Presupuesto ................................................................................................................ 51spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/18697
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Oftalmologíaspa
dc.relation.referencesSalud ocular universal : un plan de acción mundial para 2014-2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesCongdon, N. (2004). Prevalence of Cataract and Pseudophakia/Aphakia among Adults in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology, 122(4), 487–494.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaaddine L, Benjamin S, Pan L, Venkat Narayan K, Tierney E, Kanjilal S, et al. Prevalence of Visual Impairment and Selected Eye Diseases Among Persons Aged >50 Years With and Without Diabetes --- United States, 2002. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53(45):1069–71.spa
dc.relation.referencesKlein BE, Howard KP, Lee KE, Klein R. Changing Incidence of Lens Extraction Over Twenty Years: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(1):1–11.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuo C, Wang Z, He P, Chen G, Zheng X. Prevalence, causes and social factors of visual impairment among Chinese Adults: based on a national survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(1034):1–11.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Sheikh M, Iafe NA, Phasukkijwatana N, Sadda SR, Sarraf D. Biomarkers of neovascular activity in age-related macular degeneration using OCT angiography. Retina. 2017;1.spa
dc.relation.referencesGollogly HE, Hodge DO, St. Sauver JL, Erie JC. Increasing incidence of cataract surgery: Population-based study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(9):1383–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesSteinert RF, Chang DF, Bissen-Miyajima H, Fine IH, Gimbel H V, Koch DD, et al. Cataract Surgery. 2010. all.spa
dc.relation.referencesLorente R, Mendicute J (eds) Cirugía Del Cristalino. Sociedad Española de Oftalmología: Madrid, Spain, 2008; 1751–1767.spa
dc.relation.referencesBobrow JC, Beardsley TL, Jick SL, Rosenberg LF, Wiggins MN, Reich J, et al. Lens and cataract, Section 11. Basic and Clinical Science Course, American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2014. all.spa
dc.relation.referencesChylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993spa
dc.relation.referencesKarabela Y, Eliacik M, Kocabora MS, Erdur SK, Baybora H. Predicting the refractive outcome and accuracy of IOL power calculation after phacoemulsification using the SRK/T formula with ultrasound biometry in medium axial lengths. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1143–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesKim YN, Park JH, Tchah H. Quantitative Analysis of Lens Nuclear Density Using Optical Coherence Tomography ( OCT ) with a Liquid Optics Interface : Correlation between OCT Images and LOCS III Grading. J Ophthalmol. Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2016;2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesHollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG. The Effect of Polymethylmethacrylate , Silicone , and Polyacrylic Intraocular Lenses on Posterior Capsular Opacification 3 Years after Cataract Surgery. :49–55.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaboratories A. Product information AcrySof IQ Aspheric IOL. 2010. p. 1–14.spa
dc.relation.referencesWintergerst MWM, Schultz T, Birtel J, Schuster AK, Pfeiffer N, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, et al. Algorithms for the Automated Analysis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Biomarkers on Optical Coherence Tomography: A Systematic Review. Transl Vis Sci 49 Technol. 2017;6(4):10.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiao X, Peng Y, Liu B, Tan QQ, Lan CJ. Agreement of ocular biometric measurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000. Scientific Reports. 2020 Feb 21;10(1):1-6.spa
dc.relation.referencesWan KH, Lam TC, Marco CY, Chan TC. Accuracy and Precision of Intraocular Lens Calculations Using the New Hill-RBF Version 2.0 in Eyes With High Axial Myopia. American journal of ophthalmology. 2019 Sep 1;205:66-73.spa
dc.relation.referencesCooke DL, Cooke TL. Prediction accuracy of preinstalled formulas on 2 optical biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2016;42(3):358–62.spa
dc.relation.referencesOlsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power : a review The statistical. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;472–85.spa
dc.relation.referencesJeong J, Song H, Lee JK, Chuck RS, Kwon J-W. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas. BMC Ophthalmol. BMC Ophthalmology; 2017;17(1):62.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlat J, Hoa D, Mura F, Busetto T, Schneider C, Payerols A, et al. Clinical and biometric determinants of actual lens position after cataract surgery. J Cart Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2017;43(2):195–200.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts T V, Hodge C, Sutton G, Lawless M. Comparison of Hill-radial basis function, Barrett Universal and current third generation formulas for the calculation of intraocular lens power during cataract surgery: Calculation of intraocular lens power. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;46(3):240–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesKongsap P. Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients. Eye Vis. Eye and Vision; 2016;3(1):27.spa
dc.relation.referencesVentura B V., Ventura MC, Wang L, Koch DD, Weikert MP. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2017;43(1):74–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoffer KJ, Hoffmann PC, Savini G. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2016;42(8):1165–72.spa
dc.relation.referencesHashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Rezvan F, Fotouhi A, Asgari S, Miraftab M. Effect of anterior chamber depth on the choice of intraocular lens calculation formula in patients with normal axial length. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014;21(4):307.spa
dc.relation.referencesMelles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018 Feb;125(2):169–78.spa
dc.relation.referencesKane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Oct;42(10):1490–500.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoffer KJ. Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Aug;26(8):1233–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound 50 biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:765–73.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:765–73.spa
dc.relation.referencesSong, J. S., Yoon, D. Y., Hyon, J. Y., & Jeon, H. S. (2020). Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Refractive Outcomes Using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900. Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 34(2), 126–132.spa
dc.relation.referencesDarcy K, Gunn D, Tavassoli S, Sparrow J, Kane JX. Assessment of the accuracy of new and updated intraocular lens power calculation formulas in 10 930 eyes from the UK National Health Service. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jan;46(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.08.014. PMID: 32050225.spa
dc.relation.referencesEkkehard, F. (22 de April de 2019). Prediction Accuracy of Total Keratometry Compared to Standard Keratometry Using Different Intraocular Lens Power Formulas. Journal of refractive surgery, 35(6), 362-368.spa
dc.relation.referencesSabong, & Srivannaboon, S. (2019). Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery. Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesSandoval HP, Serels C, Potvin R, Solomon KD. Cataract surgery after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: objective analysis to determine best formula and keratometry to use. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2021; 47:465–470. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000472.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee H, Chung JL, Kim YJ, Kim JY, Tchah H. Prediction accuracy of standard and total keratometry by swept-source optical biometer for multifocal intraocular lens power calculation. Sci. Rep. 2021; 11:4794. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84238-1.spa
dc.relation.referencesKane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2016; 42:1490–1500. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.021.spa
dc.relation.referencesKane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Accuracy of 3 new methods for intraocular lens power selection. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2017; 43:333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.021.spa
dc.relation.referencesMelles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018; 125:169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027.spa
dc.relation.uriapolohttps://apolo.unab.edu.co/en/persons/alejandro-tello-hern%C3%A1ndezspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordsMedical sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsHealth sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsOphthalmologyspa
dc.subject.keywordsVisual disabilityspa
dc.subject.keywordsPatientsspa
dc.subject.keywordsQuality of lifespa
dc.subject.keywordsDiseases of the lens (Eyes)spa
dc.subject.keywordsIntraocular lensesspa
dc.subject.keywordsArtificial implantsspa
dc.subject.keywordsRefractionspa
dc.subject.keywordsVision disordersspa
dc.subject.lembOftalmologíaspa
dc.subject.lembCiencias médicasspa
dc.subject.lembEnfermedades del cristalino (Ojos)spa
dc.subject.lembLentes intraocularesspa
dc.subject.lembImplantes artificialesspa
dc.subject.lembRefracciónspa
dc.subject.lembTrastornos de la visiónspa
dc.subject.proposalCiencias de la saludspa
dc.subject.proposalPacientesspa
dc.subject.proposalCalidad de vidaspa
dc.subject.proposalDiscapacidad visualspa
dc.titleEvaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asféricospa
dc.title.translatedEvaluation of the biometric prediction error with the total corneal power vs. keratometric index, after implantation of an aspheric monofocal intraocular lensspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
2022_Tesis_Cianci_Peñaranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf
Tamaño:
690.52 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2022_Licencia_Cianci_Peñaranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf
Tamaño:
106.43 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Licencia
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
829 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Especialización en Oftalmología