El cálculo de la toma de decisiones corruptas: un marco analítico integrado

dc.contributor.authorBatista Vieira, James
dc.contributor.orcidBatista Vieira, James [0000-0002-3564-3677]spa
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-16T15:28:08Z
dc.date.available2026-03-16T15:28:08Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-26
dc.description.abstractEste artículo desarrolla un modelo integrado para la toma de decisiones sobre la participación en transacciones corruptas. Las explicaciones utilitarias, institucionales y psicosociales-culturales existentes suelen operar en aislamiento analítico y generar una brecha persistente en su integración, por lo que este modelo llena esa brecha al reunir estas perspectivas en una especificación probabilística. Con base en aportes centrales de la literatura, el involucramiento en actos corruptos se modela como el resultado probabilístico de superar una barrera moral y de realizar un cálculo coste-beneficio moldeado por el aprendizaje. Al aclarar las decisiones de los agentes públicos y ofrecer a los formuladores de políticas herramientas prácticas para diseñar políticas de integridad que aborden de manera conjunta los factores éticos, institucionales y conductuales, el modelo proporciona una perspectiva más realista y relevante para las políticas públicas que los enfoques centrados únicamente en incentivos utilitarios o en sanciones legales.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThis article develops an integrated decision-making model of engagement in corrupt transactions. Existing utilitarian, institutional, and psychosocial-cultural accounts typically operate in analytic isolation, producing a persistent gap in their integration; this model fills that gap by bringing these perspectives together within a probabilistic specification. Drawing on core contributions from the literature, corrupt engagement is modeled as the probabilistic outcome of crossing a moral hurdle and performing a learning-shaped cost-benefit calculus. By clarifying public agents’ choices and providing policymakers with actionable tools to design integrity policies that jointly address ethical, institutional, and behavioral drivers, the model offers a more realistic and policy-relevant perspective than approaches focused solely on utilitarian incentives or legal sanctions.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.5503
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.identifier.issn0124-0781spa
dc.identifier.issn2590-8669spa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/33501
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/5503/4294spa
dc.relation.referencesAdam, I., Fazekas, M. y Tóth, B. (2020). Measuring the benefits of open contracting: Case studies on Mexico, Paraguay, and Slovakia. Working Paper Series, 1. https://www.govtransparency.eu/measuring-the-benefits-of-open-contracting-casestudies- on-mexico-paraguay-and-slovakia/
dc.relation.referencesAlcántara-Lizárraga, J. Á. y Jima-González, A. (2022). Accountability, corruption, and opposition groups: Evidence from Latin America. Social Sciences, 11(12), 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11120541
dc.relation.referencesAlt, J. Ε. y Lassen, D. D. (2008). Inequality and corruption: Evidence from US states. EPRU Working Paper Series, 2. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/82124/1/wp-08-02.pdf
dc.relation.referencesBasu, K., Bhattacharya, S. y Mishra, A. (1992). Notes on bribery and the control of corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 48(3), 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(92)90012-5
dc.relation.referencesBecker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394
dc.relation.referencesBersch, K., Praça, S. y Taylor, M. M. (2017). State capacity, bureaucratic politicization, and corruption in the brazilian state. Governance, 30(1), 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12196
dc.relation.referencesBicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBicchieri, C. y Xiao, E. (2009). Do the right thing: But only if others do so. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.621
dc.relation.referencesBotero, S., Castro Cornejo, R., Gamboa, L., Pavão, N. y Nickerson, D. W. (2021). Are all types of wrongdoing created equal in the eyes of voters? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(2), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1 080/17457289.2019.1651322
dc.relation.referencesBrun, J.-P., Sotiropoulou, A., Gray, L., Scott, C. y Stephenson, K. M. (2021). Asset recovery handbook: A guide for practitioners (2.ª ed.). World Bank. https://star.worldbank.org/publications/asset-recovery-handbook-guide-practitionerssecond- edition
dc.relation.referencesCastro Cornejo, R. (2023). Same scandal, different interpretations: Politics of corruption, anger, and partisan bias in Mexico. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 33(3), 497-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2022.21 20487
dc.relation.referencesDahlström, C. y Lapuente, V. (2017). Organizing Leviathan: Politicians, bureaucrats, and the making of good government. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822869
dc.relation.referencesDal Bó, E., Finan, F. y Rossi, M. A. (2013). Strengthening state capabilities: The role of financial incentives in the call to public service. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(3), 1169-1218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt008
dc.relation.referencesDhami, S., al-Nowaihi, A. y Sunstein, C. R. (2019). Heuristics and public policy: Decision-making under bounded rationality. Studies in Microeconomics, 7(1), 7-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321022219832148
dc.relation.referencesDemirgüç-Kunt, A., Lokshin, M. y Kolchin, V. (2023). Effects of public sector wages on corruption: Wage inequality matters. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(3), 941-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.03.005
dc.relation.referencesDi Zheng, J., Schram, A. y Doğan, G. (2021). Friend or foe? Social ties in bribery and corruption. Experimental Economics, 24(3), 854-882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09683-7
dc.relation.referencesFalcón-Cortés, A., Aldana, A. y Larralde, H. (2022). Practices of public procurement and the risk of corrupt behavior before and after the government transition in México. EPJ Data Science, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/ s13688-022-00329-7
dc.relation.referencesFazekas, M., Sberna, S. y Vannucci, A. (2022). The extra-legal governance of corruption: Tracing the organization of corruption in public procurement. Governance, 35(4), 1139-1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12648
dc.relation.referencesFigueiredo, M. F. P. de. (2025). Corruption and the voter’s decision: Experimental evidence from Brazil. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009499736
dc.relation.referencesFišar, M., Krčál, O., Staněk, R. y Špalek, J. (2021). Committed to reciprocate on a bribe or blow the whistle: The effects of periodical staff-rotation in public administrationa. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(2), 404- 424. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1812410
dc.relation.referencesFlyvbjerg, B. (2009). Survival of the unfittest: Why the worst infrastructure gets built-and what we can do about it. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(3), 344-367. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grp024
dc.relation.referencesFox, J. A. (2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72, 346-361. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011
dc.relation.referencesFürstenberg, A. y Uhl, A. (2025). Charting a roadmap of the zoo: An institutional approach to corruption-supporting cultural concepts in Poland. Crime, Law and Social Change, 83(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-025-10219-4
dc.relation.referencesGavrilets, S., Tverskoi, D. y Sánchez, Á. (2024). Modelling social norms: An integration of the norm-utility approach with beliefs dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 379(1897), 20230027. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0027
dc.relation.referencesGelbrich, K., Stedham, Y. y Gäthke, D. (2016). Cultural discrepancy and national corruption: Investigating the difference between cultural values and practices and its relationship to corrupt behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(2), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.29
dc.relation.referencesGorsira, M., Denkers, A. y Huisman, W. (2018). Both sides of the coin: Motives for corruption among public officials and business employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(1), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3219-2
dc.relation.referencesGrimes, M. (2013). The contingencies of societal accountability: Examining the link between civil society and good government. Studies in Comparative International Development, 48(4), 380-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116- 012-9126-3
dc.relation.referencesGulino, G. y Masera, F. (2023). Contagious dishonesty: Corruption scandals and supermarket theft. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 15(4), 218-251. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20210446
dc.relation.referencesHolcombe, R. G. y Boudreaux, C. J. (2015). Regulation and corruption. Public Choice, 164(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11127-015-0263-x
dc.relation.referencesHortal, A. y Pérez Martínez, A. (2024). Behavioral strategies for reducing corruption: From regulation to choice architecture. En A. Oliver, G. A. Akerlof y M. Dold (eds.), Behavioural Public Policy (pp. 1-18). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.48
dc.relation.referencesHu, L. y Oak, M. (2023a). Can asymmetric punishment deter endogenous bribery. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 32(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12495
dc.relation.referencesHu, L. y Oak, M. (2023b). Intermediated corruption under asymmetric punishment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 215, 490-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.09.032
dc.relation.referencesHumphrey, E. A., Enofe, A. O. y Praise, E. I. (2023). Fraud diamond: Detecting fraudulent behaviours in a firm. Journal of Corporate Governance Research, 7(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.5296/jcgr.v7i1.20405
dc.relation.referencesHuss, O., Mattoni, A. y Odilla, F. (2024). Political institutions and the corruption of politics. En A. Vatter y R. Freiburghaus (eds.), Handbook of comparative political institutions (pp. 467-482). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803929095.00038
dc.relation.referencesJohnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power, and democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511490965
dc.relation.referencesKijang, S. y Onn, J. (2020). Enhancing government effectiveness and transparency: The fight against corruption. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/235541600116631094/pdf/Enhancing-Government-Effectiveness-and- Transparency-The-Fight-Against-Corruption.pdf
dc.relation.referencesKlitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. University of California Press.
dc.relation.referencesKöbis, N. C., Iragorri-Carter, D. y Starke, C. (2018). A social psychological view on the social norms of corruption. En I. Kubbe y A. Engelbert (eds.), Corruption and norms: Why informal rules matter (pp. 31-52). Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66254-1_3
dc.relation.referencesKubbe, I. y Engelbert, A. (eds.) (2018). Corruption and norms. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66254-1
dc.relation.referencesKrueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64(3), 291-303.
dc.relation.referencesLambsdorff, J. G. (2002). Making corrupt deals: Contracting in the shadow of the law. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(3), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00217-7
dc.relation.referencesLee, D. S., Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. y Park, S. (2025). Learning effects of anti-corruption reform in public organisations: Explanations from social psychological theory. Public Management Review, 27(7), 1764-1785. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/14719037.2022.2051064
dc.relation.referencesLui, F. T. (1985). An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. Journal of Political Economy, 93(4), 760-781. https://doi. org/10.1086/261329
dc.relation.referencesManara, M. U., Nübold, A., van Gils, S. y Zijlstra, F. R. (2023). Exploring the path to corruption: An informed grounded theory study on the decision-making process underlying corruption. PLoS ONE, 18(9), e0291819. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291819
dc.relation.referencesMares, I. y Young, L. E. (2018). The core voter’s curse: Clientelistic threats and promises in hungarian elections. Comparative Political Studies, 51(11), 1441-1471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758754
dc.relation.referencesMazar, N. y Ariely, D. (2006). Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.25.1.117
dc.relation.referencesMishra, A. y Samuel, A. (2024). Bribery and temptation: More red tape or more discretion? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 224, 641-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.06.020
dc.relation.referencesMungiu-Pippidi, A. (2013). Controlling corruption through collective action. Journal of Democracy, 24(1), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0020
dc.relation.referencesNagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 42, 199-263. https://doi.org/10.1086/670398
dc.relation.referencesNorth, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
dc.relation.referencesOdilla, F. y Bidegain, G. (2025). Innovative but feeble: Civil society and political financing accountability in Uruguay. Journal of Civil Society, 21(2), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2024.2413524
dc.relation.referencesOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Fighting bid rigging in Brazil: A review of federal public procurement. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/fighting-bid-rigging-in-brazil_ea7e1690-en.html
dc.relation.referencesPanizza, F., Peters, B. G. y Larraburu, C. R. (2022). The politics of patronage appointments in Latin American central administrations. University of Pittsburgh Press.
dc.relation.referencesPolga-Hecimovich, J. (2019). Bureaucracy in Latin America. En Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi. org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1675
dc.relation.referencesPower, T. J. y Taylor, M. M. (2011). Corruption and democracy in Brazil: The struggle for accountability. University of Notre Dame Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19m61t1
dc.relation.referencesRabl, T. (2011). The impact of situational influences on corruption in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0768-2
dc.relation.referencesRabl, T. y Kühlmann, T. M. (2008). Understanding corruption in organizations-development and empirical assessment of an action model. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 477-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9898-6
dc.relation.referencesRabl, T. y Kühlmann, T. M. (2008). Understanding corruption in organizations-development and empirical assessment of an action model. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 477-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9898-6
dc.relation.referencesSimon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4.ª ed.). Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesTullock, G., Rowley, C. K. y Tollison, R. D. (eds.) (1988). The political economy of rent-seeking. Springer.
dc.relation.referencesUhl, A., Herrmann, C. y Treiber, K. H. (2025). Corruption: A situational action view. Theory and Society, 54(1), 161-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-024-09590-3
dc.relation.referencesVerma, P., Nandi, A. K. y Sengupta, S. (2017). Bribery games on inter-dependent regular networks. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 42735. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42735
dc.relation.referencesVieira, J. B. (2013). O fundamento das improbidades na administração pública municipal brasileira [tesis de doctorado, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro]. https://www.bdtd.uerj.br:8443/handle/1/12410
dc.relation.referencesVieira, J. B. (2021). Corrupção: Conceito, mensuração e referencial analítico. Editora EDIFSP. https://editora.ifsp.edu.br/edifsp/ catalog/view/10/10/41
dc.relation.referencesVieira, J. B. (2023). How social accountability fosters public integrity: The role of public policy councils in curbing corruption. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 31, e017. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-98732331e017
dc.relation.referencesVieira, J. B. y Miranda, L. F. (2024). When corruption strikes back: How congress reverses anti-corruption reforms in Brazil. En F. Odilla y K. Tsimonis (eds.), Corruption and anti-corruption upside down: New perspectives from the global south (pp. 261-287). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66032-0_11
dc.relation.referencesVieira, J. B., Melo, V. D. S. de y Mota, F. P. B. (eds.) (2024). Manual de gestão de contratos públicos orientados para resultados. Editora UFPB. https://www.editora.ufpb.br/press5/index.php/UFPB/catalog/book/1238
dc.relation.referencesWaxenecker, H. y Prell, C. (2024). Corruption dynamics in public procurement: A longitudinal network analysis of local construction contracts in Guatemala. Social Networks, 79, 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2024.07.001
dc.relation.referencesWright, B. E., Hassan, S. y Park, J. (2016). Does a Public service ethic encourage ethical behaviour? Public service motivation, ethical leadership and the willingness to report ethical problems. Public Administration, 94(3), 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12248
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/issue/view/331spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.sourceVol. 27 Núm. 56 (2025): Corrupción y anticorrupción en América Latina: retos, innovaciones y perspectivas; 31-44spa
dc.subjectCorrupciónspa
dc.subjectToma de decisionesspa
dc.subjectPolítica gubernamentalspa
dc.subjectAdministración públicaspa
dc.subjectGobernanzaspa
dc.subject.keywordsCorruptioneng
dc.subject.keywordsDecision makingeng
dc.subject.keywordsGovernment policyeng
dc.subject.keywordsPublic administrationeng
dc.subject.keywordsGovernancespa
dc.titleEl cálculo de la toma de decisiones corruptas: un marco analítico integradospa
dc.title.translatedThe Calculus of Corrupt Decision-Making: An Integrated Analytical Frameworkeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Artículo 3.pdf
Tamaño:
346.38 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Artículo

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
829 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: