Bloqueo peribulbar adicionando opioides en analgesia postoperatoria para cirugía oftálmica. Un ensayo clínico controlado

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorRangel Jaimes, Germán Williamspa
dc.contributor.authorChona Vásquez, Jorge Enriquespa
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Luis Mauriciospa
dc.contributor.cvlacRangel Jaimes, Germán William [000142574]
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T14:22:43Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T14:22:43Z
dc.date.issued2001-04-11
dc.description.abstractCon el objetivo de evaluar el efecto de la adición de opioides a la mezcla utilizada para el bloqueo peribulbar en cirugía de catarata sobre el tiempo de latencia y el control postoperatorio del dolor, se realizó un ensayo clínico controlado en pacientes intervenidos por catarata en la Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander. Se estudiaron 98pacientes distribuidos en tres grupos (A: anestésico local; B: anestésico local + morfina; C: anestésico local + fentanyl).La necesidad de refuerzo fue igual en todos, pero el tiempo de latencia fue estadísticamente distinto entre los tres grupos (A: 7,46±3,28; B: 5,59±3,91; y, C: 3,61±2,20minutos). Las mezclas con opioides presentaron más complicaciones derivadas de la técnica. La persistencia dela analgesia postoperatoria por más de doce horas fue significativamente diferente también entre los grupos con opioide frente al control (A: 33,33% de los pacientes; B:82,20%; y, C:77,78%). Con este estudio se demuestra la utilidad de adicionar opioides a la mezcla utilizada en anestesia peribulbar en cirugía de catarataspa
dc.description.abstractenglishIn order to evaluate the effect of the addition of opioids to the mixture used for peribulbar block in cataract surgery on latency time and postoperative pain control, a controlled clinical trial was carried out in patients operated on for cataract at the Fundación Santander Ophthalmology. Ninety-eight patients distributed into three groups were studied (A: local anesthetic; B: local anesthetic + morphine; C: local anesthetic + fentanyl). The need for reinforcement was the same in all, but the latency time was statistically different between the three groups ( A: 7.46 ± 3.28; B: 5.59 ± 3.91; and, C: 3.61 ± 2.20 minutes). The mixtures with opioids presented more complications derived from the technique. The persistence of postoperative analgesia for more than twelve hours was also significantly different between the opioid groups versus the control (A: 33.33% of patients; B: 82.20%; and, C: 77.78%). This study demonstrates the usefulness of adding opioids to the mixture used in peribulbar anesthesia in cataract surgery.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.identifier.issn2382-4603
dc.identifier.issn0123-7047
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/10584
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Salud
dc.publisher.programPregrado Medicina
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/medunab/article/view/318/299
dc.relation.referencesMadingan N, Raj P. History and current status of painmanagement. In Raj P (ed). Practical management of pain. 2ded, 1994:3-15
dc.relation.referencesDavis D, Mandel M. Peribulbar anesthesia, a review of techniquesand complications. In Gills J, Hustead R, Sanders D (eds).Ophthalmic anesthesia, Baltimore, John Wiley, 1993: 101-2
dc.relation.referencesAzmon B, Alster Y, Lazar M, Geyer O. Effectiveness of sub-Tenon sversus peribulbar anesthesia in extracapsular cataract surgery.J Cataract Refract Surg 1999 Dec;25(12):1646-50
dc.relation.referencesNathan N, Mohamed B, Spurr AA, et al. The role of hyaluronaiseon lidocaine and bupivacaine pharmacokinetics after peribulbarblockade. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:1060-4
dc.relation.referencesEdge R, Navon S. Scleral perforation during retrobulbar and peribulbaranesthesia: risk factors and outcome in 50,000 consecutiveinjections. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999 Sep;25(9):1237-44
dc.relation.referencesReady L. Acute postoperative pain. In Miller R (ed). Anesthesia.Baltimore, Saunders, 4th ed, Vol. II, 1996: 1945-56
dc.relation.referencesBonica J. Mecanismos del dolor. Rev Colomb Anest 1981; 9:193-202
dc.relation.referencesAnderson R, Vaslef S. Shock, causes and management ofcirculatory collapse. In Sabiston RJ (ed). Textbook of surgery.Baltimore, Saunders, 15th ed, 1997: 88-90
dc.relation.referencesSenda T, Matsuno K, Mita S. The presence of sigma receptor subtypes in bovine retinal membranes. Exp Eye Res 1997; 64:857-60
dc.relation.referencesMakan MH, Dobrenis K, Downies S, Lyman WD, Dvorkin B.Presence of opiate alkaloid-selective mu3 receptors in culturedastrocites and in brain and retina. Adv Exp Med Biol 1996; 402:23-8
dc.relation.referencesde Córdoba JL, Balsells J, Sánchez-Dalmau B, Llonch JM, BernalJ. Retrobulbar versus peribulbar block: alfentanil in eye blocks.Reg Anesth 1996;21: 171
dc.relation.referencesMorgan GE, Mikhail MS. Anestesia para la cirugía oftálmica. EnMorgan GE (ed). Anestesiología clínica. México, ManualModerno, 1995: 719-29
dc.relation.referencesPanos L, Panos A. Regional and local block of acute pain. AnesthClin North Am 1992; 2: 344-53
dc.relation.referencesJoris JL, Dubner R, Hardgreaves KM. Opioid analgesia atperipheral sites: A target for opioids released during stress andinflammation? Anesth Analg 1987; 66:1277-81
dc.relation.referencesICH Harmonised tripartite guideline for good clinical practice.Washington, Bookwood Medical Publications, 1996:1-46
dc.relation.referencesFleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Baltimore,John Wiley, 1981: 44-5
dc.relation.referencesRepública de Colombia, Ministerio de Salud. Resolución0088430 de 1993 sobre normas científicas, técnicas yadministrativas para la investigación en salud
dc.relation.referencesRueda P. Ética en la investigación médica. Anales Acad MedicinaMedellín, 1988 (Epoca V): 61-66
dc.relation.referencesMoore KL. Cráneo y cara, cabeza y cuello. En Moore KL (ed).Anatomía con orientación clínica. México, Interamericana, 3ªed, 1996:953-1202
dc.relation.referencesGardner E, Gray DJ, O Rahilly R. Cráneo, órbita. En Gardner E(ed). Anatomía. Bogotá, Salvat, 3a ed, 1981: 717-45
dc.relation.referencesDripss RD, Lammont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia insurgical mortality. JAMA 1961; 79:243-60
dc.relation.referencesBilben N. Medición del dolor en clínica. En Paeile C, Bilbeny N(eds). El dolor, aspectos básicos y clínicos. Bacelona, Salvat,2ª ed, 1997: 144-63
dc.relation.referencesDópfmer UR, Maloney DG, Gaynor PA, et al. Prilocaine 3% issuperior to a misture of bupivacaine and lignocaine for peribulbaranaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 77-80
dc.relation.referencesFriedman DS, Bass EB, Lubomski LH, et al. Synthesis of theliterature on the effectiveness of regional anesthesia for cataractsurgery. Ophthalmology 2001;108: 519-29
dc.relation.referencesLindley-Jones MF. Topical anaesthesia for phacoemulsificationsurgery. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2000 28: 287-9
dc.relation.referencesAziz ES, Samra A. Prospective evaluation of deep topical fornixnerve block versus peribulbar nerve block in patients undergoingcataract surgery using phacoemulsification. Br J Anaesth2000;85:314-6
dc.relation.referencesKallio H, Paloheimo M, Maunuksela EL. Hyaluronidase as anadjuvant in bupivacaine-lidocaine mixture for retrobulbar/peribulbar block. Anesth Analg 2000 Oct;91(4):934-7
dc.relation.referencesWoodward DK, Leung AT, Tse MW, Law RW, Lam DS, Kee WD.Peribulbar anaesthesia with 1% ropivacaine and hyaluronidase300 IU ml-1: comparison with 0.5% bupivacaine/2% lidocaineand hyaluronidase 50 IU ml-1. Br J Anaesth 2000 Oct;85(4):618-20
dc.relation.referencesBedi A, Carabine U. Peribulbar anaesthesia: A double-blindcomparison of three local anaesthetic solutions. Anaesthesia.1999; 54: 67-71
dc.relation.referencesPac-Soo CK, Deacock S, Lockwood G, Carr C, Whitwam JG.Patient-controlled sedation for cataract surgery using peribulbarblock. Brit J Anaesth 1996; 77:370-4
dc.relation.referencesKatz J, Feldman MA, Bass EB, et al. Injectable versus topicalanesthesia for cataract surgery: patient perceptions of pain andside effects. The Study of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgerystudy team. Ophthalmology 2000;107: 2054-60
dc.relation.referencesPerello A, George J, Skelton V, Pateman J. A double-blindrandomised comparison of ropivacaine 0.5%, bupivacaine0.375% -lidocaine 1% and ropivacaine 0.5% - lidocaine 1%mixtures for cataract surgery. Anaesthesia 2000;55: 1003-7
dc.relation.referencesBoezaart A, Berry R, Nell M. Topical anesthesia versusretrobulbar block for cataract surgery: the patients perspective.J Clin Anesth 2000;12: 58-60
dc.relation.referencesLuchetti M, Magni G, Marraro G. A prospective randomizeddouble-blinded controlled study of ropivacaine 0.75% versusbupivacaine 0.5%-mepivacaine 2% for peribulbar anesthesia..Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000;25: 195-200
dc.relation.referencesNicholson G, Sutton B, Hall GM. Comparison of 1% ropivacainewith 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for peribulbaranaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2000;84: 89-91
dc.relation.referencesSandford DK, Minoso, de Cal OE, Belyea DA. Response ofintraocular pressure to retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia.Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1998;29: 815-7
dc.relation.referencesHamilton RC, Gimbel HV, Strunin L. Regional anaesthesia for12,000 cataract extraction and intraocular procedures. Can JAnaesth 1988; 35: 615-23
dc.relation.referencesJay WM, Carter H, Williams B, Green K. Effect of applying theHoman intraocular pressure reducer before cataract surgery.Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 100:523-7
dc.relation.referencesO Sullivan EP. Comparison of 0.75% levobupivacaine with 0.75%racemic bupivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia. Anaesthesia1999; 54: 610
dc.relation.referencesNielsen PJ, Allerod CW. Evaluation of local anesthesiatechniques for small incision cataract surgery. J Cataract RefractSurg 1998; 24:1136-44
dc.relation.referencesRipart J, Lefrant JY, Vivien B, et al. Ophthalmic regionalanesthesia: medial canthus episcleral (sub-tenon) anesthesiais more efficient than peribulbar anesthesia: A double-blindrandomized study. Anesthesiology 2000; 92:1278-85
dc.relation.referencesHamilton RC. A discourse on the complications of retrobulbarand peribulbar blockade. Can J Ophthalmol 2000; 35:363-72
dc.relation.referencesKallio H, Paloheimo M, Maunuksela EL. Haemorrhage and riskfactors associated with retrobulbar/peribulbar block: aprospective study in 1383 patients. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85:708-11
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/medunab/article/view/318
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.sourceMedUNAB; Vol. 4 Núm. 10 (2001): Edición especial dolor; 5-12
dc.subjectCiencias biomédicas
dc.subjectCiencias de la vida
dc.subjectInnovaciones en salud
dc.subjectInvestigaciones
dc.subject.keywordsHealth Scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsMedicineeng
dc.subject.keywordsMedical Scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsBiomedical Scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsLife Scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsInnovations in healtheng
dc.subject.keywordsResearcheng
dc.subject.keywordsPeribulbar block
dc.subject.keywordsPostoperative analgesia
dc.subject.keywordsOpiates
dc.subject.keywordsCataract
dc.subject.lembCiencias de la salud
dc.subject.lembMedicina
dc.subject.lembCiencias médicas
dc.subject.proposalBloqueo peribulbar
dc.subject.proposalAnalgesia postoperatoria
dc.subject.proposalOpiáceos
dc.subject.proposalCatarata
dc.titleBloqueo peribulbar adicionando opioides en analgesia postoperatoria para cirugía oftálmica. Un ensayo clínico controlado
dc.title.translatedPeribulbar block adding opioids in postoperative analgesia for ophthalmic surgery. A controlled clinical trialeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversionInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
2001_Bloqueo_peribulbar_adicionando (2).pdf
Tamaño:
823.99 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Articulo
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista MedUNAB