Ciudadanía moderna, ¿un obstáculo para los derechos humanos? De Arendt a Benhabib

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorDelgado Parra, María Concepciónspa
dc.contributor.orcidDelgado Parra, María Concepción [0000-0001-7388-4052]spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T15:12:36Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T15:12:36Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-22
dc.description.abstractEl artículo analiza la crítica de Hannah Arendt a las declaraciones de los derechos humanos para examinar por qué la ciudadanía moderna constituye un dique para los “derechos del hombre” y discute la ciudadanía cosmopolita planteada por Seyla Benhabib, como una vía para superar esta aporía. Para ello, se abordan las perplejidades de los derechos del hombre, desarrollada por Arendt, toda vez que los derechos humanos son concebidos en el marco de la ciudadanía nacional, dejando fuera a quienes no pueden esgrimir esa pertenencia, o han sido desposeídos de ella. A continuación, se discute su concepto de “dignidad humana”, cuya configuración epistémica y metodológica permitirá establecer la mediación con la noción de ciudadanía cosmopolita de Benhabib, cuya estrategia cierra la brecha abierta por Arendt en las dimensiones contenidas en el “derecho a tener derechos”.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe article analyzes Hannah Arendt's criticism of human rights declarations to examine why modern citizenship constitutes a barrier to the “rights of man” and discusses the cosmopolitan citizenship proposed by Seyla Benhabib as a means of overcoming this aporia. To this end, it addresses the perplexities of human rights developed by Arendt, since human rights are conceived within the framework of national citizenship, excluding those who cannot claim this membership, or have been deprived of it. It then discusses her concept of “human dignity,” whose epistemic and methodological configuration will make it possible to mediate with the notion of cosmopolitan citizenship of Benhabib, whose strategy bridges the gap opened by Arendt in the dimensions contained in the “right to have rights.”eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doi10.29375/01240781.2142
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.identifier.issn2590-8669|0124-0781
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/10890
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUNAB
dc.publisher.deparmentInstituto de Estudios Políticos IEPspa
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/2142/1906
dc.relation.referencesAgamben, Giorgio (1998), Hommo Sacer: Souereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Standford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesArendt, Hannah (1998), The Human Condition. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.references( 1968 ) , The Origins of Totalitarianism. Nueva York: Harcourt.
dc.relation.referencesBenhabib, Seyla (2011), Dignity and Aduersity. Human Rights in Troubled Times. Cambridge: Polity Press.
dc.relation.referencesConstitutional Protection of Human Rights", Journal of Politics and Law, Vol. 1, N° 3, pp 73-78.
dc.relation.referencesMate, Reyes (2010), "Hannah Arendt y los derechos humanos", Arbor, Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, Vol. CLXXXVI, N° 742, pp 240-243.
dc.relation.references________ (2004) The Rights of Others. Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references________ (2002) The Claims of Culture. Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.references________ (1994), Situating the Self. Nueva York: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesBerlin, Isaiah (1969), Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBirmingham, Peg (2006), Hannah Arendt and Human Rights: The Predicamento f Common Responsability. Bloomington e Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBurke, Edmund (1987), Reflections on the Revolution in France. Cambridge: Hackett.
dc.relation.referencesGadamer, H. (2005) La dialéctica de Hegel. Cinco ensayos hermenéuticos. Madrid: Cátedra Teorema.
dc.relation.referencesHansen, Phillip (1993), Hannah Arendt: Politics, History and Citizenship. Standford: Stanford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHegel, G.W.F. (1985), Fenomenología del espíritu. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relation.referencesIgnatieff, Michel (2001), Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLewis, C. S. (1947), The Abolition of Man. Nueva York: Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesShapiro, Ian (1986), The Evolucion of Rights in Liberal Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesArendt, Hannah (1949a), “The Rights of Man: What Are They”, Modern Review Vol. 3, Nº 1, pp 24-36.
dc.relation.references________ (1949b), “Es gibt nur ein einziges Menschenrecht”, Die Wandlung, Vol. IV, pp 754-770.
dc.relation.referencesCohen, Jean L. (2000), “Rights, Citizenship and the Modern Form of the Social: Dilemmas of Arendtian Republicanism”, Constellations, Vol. 3. Nº 2, pp 164-189.
dc.relation.referencesCover, Robert (1983/84), "Foreword: Nomos and Narrative", The Supreme Court 1982 Term, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 97, N° 7, pp 4-68.
dc.relation.referencesBenhabib, Seyla (2013), "Reason-Giving and Rights-Bearing: Constucting the Subject of Rights", Constellations, Vol. 20, N° 1, pp 37-50
dc.relation.referencesFalk, Richard (2004), "Human Rights", Foreign Policy, N°41, pp 18-26.
dc.relation.referencesHelis, John (2008), "Hannah Arendt and Human Dignity: Theoretical Foundations and
dc.relation.referencesMenke, Cristoph; Kaiser, Birgit y Thiele Katrin (2007), “The 'Aporias of Human Rights' and the 'One Human Right': Regarding the Coherence of Hannah Arendt's Argument”, Social Research, Vol. 74, Nº 3, pp 739-762.
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/2142
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.sourceReflexión Política; Vol. 16 No. 32 (2014): Reflexión Política (julio a diciembre); 112-126
dc.subjectDerecho a tener derechos
dc.subjectDignidad humana
dc.subjectLibertad de acción
dc.subjectLibertad comunicativa
dc.subjectCiudadanía cosmopolita
dc.subject.keywordsRight to have rightseng
dc.subject.keywordsHuman dignityeng
dc.subject.keywordsFreedom of actioneng
dc.subject.keywordsCommunicative freedomeng
dc.subject.keywordsCosmopolitan citizenshipeng
dc.subject.keywordsLegal scienceseng
dc.subject.lembDerecho a tener derechosspa
dc.subject.lembDignidad humanaspa
dc.subject.lembLibertad de acciónspa
dc.subject.lembLibertad comunicativaspa
dc.subject.lembCiudadanía cosmopolitaspa
dc.subject.lembCiencias jurídicasspa
dc.subject.lembInvestigaciónspa
dc.titleCiudadanía moderna, ¿un obstáculo para los derechos humanos? De Arendt a Benhabibspa
dc.title.translatedModern citizenship: an obstacle to human rights? From Arendt to Benhabibeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversionInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CJournalArticle

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
2014_Articulo_Ciudadanía moderna.pdf
Tamaño:
1.27 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Artículo
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Reflexión Política