Factores prenatales asociados a terminación del embarazo por césarea primaria, en el Instituto de Salud de Bucaramanga (ISABU): Análisis secundario del estudio Zikalliance

dc.contributor.advisorOrtiz Serrano, Ricardo
dc.contributor.advisorOchoa Vera, Miguel Enrique
dc.contributor.apolounabOchoa Vera, Miguel Enrique [miguel-enrique-ochoa-vera]spa
dc.contributor.apolounabOrtiz Serrano, Ricardo [ricardo-ortiz-serrano]spa
dc.contributor.authorEspitia Orejarena, Derlly Marcela
dc.contributor.cvlacOchoa Vera, Miguel Enrique [0000898465]spa
dc.contributor.orcidOchoa Vera, Miguel [0000-0002-4552-3388]spa
dc.contributor.orcidOrtiz Serrano, Ricardo [0009-0004-4859-5952]spa
dc.coverage.campusUNAB Campus Bucaramangaspa
dc.coverage.spatialBucaramanga (Santander, Colombia)spa
dc.coverage.temporal2019-2023spa
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T16:43:44Z
dc.date.available2023-08-09T16:43:44Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-08
dc.degree.nameEspecialista en Ginecología y Obstetriciaspa
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: La cesárea es una de las intervenciones quirúrgicas más comunes en la obstetricia. Este procedimiento, cuando está médicamente indicado, puede salvar la vida tanto de la madre como del recién nacido. Sin embargo, como todas las cirugías, la cesárea expone a la mujer y a su producto a riesgos de salud tanto inmediatos como a largo plazo. Las principales complicaciones obstétricas asociadas con la cesárea incluyen muerte materna, infección posparto, ruptura uterina, lesión vesical, placentación anormal, embarazo ectópico, muerte fetal y parto prematuro, entre otras. Así mismo, la cesárea presenta un tiempo de recuperación más largo y el riesgo de infección es mayor en comparación con el parto vaginal. A esto último se suma el hecho de que muchas cesáreas se realizan innecesariamente, lo que termina aumentando el riesgo de ocurrencia de estas complicaciones, con un impacto más significativo en aquellas gestantes que se exponen por primera vez, debido a que, a partir de este evento, se desencadenaran más intervenciones y por tanto más riesgos. Por tal razón, el objetivo actual se basa en la creación de métodos que permitan evitar la cesárea primaria; al identificar y modificar las conductas médicas que pueden ser corregidas desde los controles prenatales, así como las condiciones durante el trabajo de parto que, en lo posible, deben ser tenidas en cuenta a la hora de la atención de la gestante. Estas condiciones incluyen: inducciones fallidas, estados fetales no satisfactorios, fallas en la progresión de trabajo de parto y hasta la misma indicación por solicitud materna. Al abordar estas situaciones, se busca disminuir la tasa de cesáreas innecesarias y promover un enfoque más seguro y efectivo parala elección de la vía del parto. Esto no solo beneficiará a las mujeres al reducir los riesgos asociados con la cirugía, sino que también puede mejorar la experiencia del parto y la recuperación postparto. En última instancia, garantizar la salud y el bienestar tanto de las madres como de los recién nacidos, promoviendo prácticas basadas en la evidencia y una atención obstétrica de calidad.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishntroduction: Cesarean section is one of the most common surgical interventions in obstetrics. This procedure, when medically indicated, can save the life of both the mother like a newborn. However, like all surgeries, a cesarean section exposes the woman and her your product to both immediate and long-term health risks. The main obstetric complications associated with caesarean section include maternal death, infection postpartum, uterine rupture, bladder injury, abnormal placentation, ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth and premature birth, among others. Likewise, the cesarean section presents a longer recovery time long and the risk of infection is higher compared to vaginal delivery. Added to the latter is the fact that many caesarean sections are performed unnecessarily, which ends up increasing the risk of occurrence of these complications, with a more significant in those pregnant women who are exposed for the first time, because, from this event, more interventions will be triggered and therefore more risks. For this reason, the goal current is based on the creation of methods to avoid primary caesarean section; by identifying and modify medical behaviors that can be corrected from prenatal check-ups, as well such as conditions during labor that, if possible, should be taken into account at the time of care of the pregnant woman. These conditions include: failed inductions, states unsatisfactory fetuses, failures in the progression of labor and even the same indication by maternal request. By addressing these situations, it seeks to reduce the rate of unnecessary cesarean sections and promote a Safer and more effective approach for the choice of delivery route. This will not only benefit women by reducing the risks associated with surgery, but may also improve the childbirth experience and postpartum recovery. Ultimately, ensuring the health and well-being of both mothers and newborns, promoting practices based on evidence and quality obstetric care.spa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.learningmodalityModalidad Presencialspa
dc.description.tableofcontents1 Título del proyecto ............................................................................................ 5 2 Resumen ............................................................................................................ 5 3 Introducción ...................................................................................................... 8 4 Planteamiento del problema ............................................................................... 8 5 Justificación .................................................................................................... 10 6 Marco teórico .................................................................................................. 12 6.1 Tipos de parto ........................................................................................... 12 6.1.1 Parto vaginal ........................................................................................ 12 6.1.2 Preparto................................................................................................ 13 6.1.3 Trabajo de parto ................................................................................... 13 6.1.4 Primer período ..................................................................................... 13 6.1.5 Segundo período .................................................................................. 14 6.1.6 Tercer período: ..................................................................................... 14 6.2 Complicaciones anteparto e intraparto ...................................................... 14 6.3 Parto por cesárea ...................................................................................... 15 6.3.1 Cesárea primaria .................................................................................. 17 6.4 Riesgos de la Cesárea ............................................................................... 18 6.5 Controles prenatales ................................................................................. 20 6.6 Factores de riesgo gestacionales (durante el embarazo) ............................. 22 6.6.1 Problemas de salud existentes............................................................... 22 6.7 Factores del estilo de vida ......................................................................... 25 6.8 Condiciones del embarazo ........................................................................ 26 7 Estado del arte ................................................................................................. 28 7.1 Literatura relacionada con factores sociodemográficos .............................. 29 7.2 Literatura relacionada con cesárea planeada .............................................. 32 7.3 Literatura relacionada con aspectos hospitalarios ...................................... 33 7.4 Literatura relacionada con factores clínicos ............................................... 34 7.5 Literatura Latinoamericana ....................................................................... 39 8 Objetivos.......................................................................................................... 41 8.1 Objetivo general ........................................................................................ 41 8.2 Objetivos específicos ................................................................................ 42 9 Metodología ..................................................................................................... 42 9.1 Diseño del estudio ..................................................................................... 42 9.2 Universo ................................................................................................... 43 9.3 Población y tamaño de la muestra ............................................................. 43 9.4 Criterios de selección ................................................................................ 44 9.4.1 Criterios de inclusión ............................................................................ 44 9.4.2 Criterios de exclusión ........................................................................... 44 9.5 Variables: .................................................................................................. 44 Tabla 2. Operacionalización de variables ............................................................ 45 9.6 Procedimiento para el desarrollo del estudio.............................................. 50 9.7 Plan de procesamiento y análisis de datos.................................................. 50 9.8 Declaración sobre las disposiciones éticas ................................................. 51 10 Resultados ........................................................................................................ 52 10.1 Análisis Univariado: ................................................................................. 52 10.1.1 Análisis de resultados obtenido en el grupo de cesárea primaria .......... 52 10.2 Análisis epidemiológico de las medidas de asociación............................... 65 10.3 Análisis epidemiológico de las variables imagenológica ....................... 65 11 Discusión ......................................................................................................... 75 12 Conclusiones. .................................................................................................. 85 13 Referencias ...................................................................................................... 87spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/21119
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Ginecología y Obstetriciaspa
dc.relation.references1 Buhimschi C, Buhimschi I. Advantages of Vaginal Delivery. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006; 49(1): p. 167-183.spa
dc.relation.references2 Gregory K, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus Vaginal Delivery: Whose Risks? Whose Benefits? American Journal of Perinatology. 2011 August; 29: p. 7-18.spa
dc.relation.references3 Barber E, Lundsberg L, Belanger K, Pettker C, Funai E, Illuzzi J. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118(1): p. 29-38.spa
dc.relation.references4 Organización Panamericana de la Salud. La cesárea solo debería realizarse cuando sea médicamente necesaria. Ginebra/Washington: OPS Colombia, Familia, Promoción de la Salud y Curso de Vida ; 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesField A, Haloob R. Complications of caesarean section. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2016 Enero; 18: p. 265–272.spa
dc.relation.references6 Organización Mundial de la Salud. Declaración de la OMS sobre tasas de cesárea . Ginebra: OMS; 2015spa
dc.relation.references7 ACOG. Practice bulletin no115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 August; 1(116): p. 450-63.spa
dc.relation.references8 ACOG. Practice bulletin no116: Management of Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Tracings. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116(5): p. 1232–40.spa
dc.relation.references9 DANE. Estadísticas vitales de nacimientos y defunciones. Estadísticas nacionales. Bogotá:, Departamento Administartivo Nacional de Estadística; 2017spa
dc.relation.references10 ACOG. Practice bulletin no33: Diagnosis and Management of and Eclampsia. Obste Gynecol. 2002; 99: p. 159-167.spa
dc.relation.references11 OMS. Declaración de la OMS sobre tasas de cesárea. Resumen ejecutivo. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2015.spa
dc.relation.references12 Schnap J, Sepúlveda C, Robert E. Cesarean section, Unidad de Medicina Materno Fetal. Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Clínica Las Condes. Revista médica clínica las condesas. 2014; 25(6): p. 987-992.spa
dc.relation.references13 ACOG. Committe Opinion no234: Scheduled Cesarean Delivery and the Prevention of Vertical transmission of HIV Infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May.spa
dc.relation.references14 Panda S, Begley C, Daly D. Clinicians’ views of factors influencing decisionmaking for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. PLoS ONE. 2018 July; 13(7): p. 1-27.spa
dc.relation.references15 National Public Radio (NPR). Doctors Urge Patience, And Longer Labor, To Reduce C-Sections. [Online].; 2014 [cited 2020 Mayo. Available from: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2014/02/20/280199498/doctors-urgepatience- and-longer-labor-to-reduce-c-sections.spa
dc.relation.references16 Cunningham G, Leveno K, Bloom S, Dashe J, Hoffman B, Casey B, et al. Williams Obstetricia. Vigesimoquinta Edición ed. Ciudad de México: McGRAW-HILL Interamericana Editores, S.A. de C.V.; 2019.spa
dc.relation.references17 Edmonds K. Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Seventh Edition ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2007.spa
dc.relation.references18 Patterson D. Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery. American Family Physician. 2008 August; 78(3): p. 336-341.spa
dc.relation.references19 Vázquez J, Rodríguez L, Palomo R, Romeu M, Jiménez M, Pérez S, et al. Manual básico de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Manual. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria; 2012.spa
dc.relation.references20 Carvajal J, Ralph C. Manual de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Novena Edición ed. Santiago de Chile: Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina. Pontifica Universida Católica de Chile; 2019.spa
dc.relation.references21 Beckmann C, Ling F, Barzansky B, Herbert W, Laube D, Smith R. Obstetrics and Gynecology. Sixth Edition ed.: Wolters Kluwer Health. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2010.spa
dc.relation.references22 The American College of Nurse-Midwives. El Dolor Durante el Trabajo de parto. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2013 April; 58(2).spa
dc.relation.references23 Ehsanipoor R, Satin A. Normal and abnormal labor progression. UpToDate. 2020 May.spa
dc.relation.references24 Fonseca J, Rodriguez J, Salazar D. Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section. Colomb Med. 2019; 50(1): p. 13-21.spa
dc.relation.references25 ACOG. Practice bulletin no 82: Clinical Management Guidelines For Obstetrician - Gynecologist. Ostet Gynecol. 2007; 109(6): p. 1489–98.spa
dc.relation.references26 McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy D. Elective Cesarean Section and Decision Making: A Critical Review of the Literature. Birth Issues in Perinatal Care. 2007 March; 34(1): p. 65-79.spa
dc.relation.references27 Martínez G. Criterios para el manejo de cesárea de urgencia. Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología. 2013 Junio; 36(1): p. 159-162.spa
dc.relation.references28 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Classification of urgency of caesarean section – a continuum of risk: Good Practice No. 11. Guía de salud. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2010.spa
dc.relation.references29 Torloni M, Betran A, Souza J, Widmer M, Allen T, Gulmezoglu M, et al. Classifications for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE. 2011 January; 6(1): p. 1-10spa
dc.relation.references30 Boyle A, Reddy U, Landy H, Huang C, Driggers R, Laughon K. Primary Cesarean Delivery in the United States. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2013 July; 122(1): p. 33-40.spa
dc.relation.references31 Tita A. When Is Primary Cesarean Appropriate: Maternal and Obstetrical Indications. Seminars in Perinatology. 2012; 36: p. 324-327.spa
dc.relation.references32 Grisaru S, Samueloff A. Primary nonmedically indicated cesarean section (‘‘section on request’’): evidence based or modern vogue? Clinics in Perinatology. 2004; 31: p. 409 – 430spa
dc.relation.references33 Caughey A, Cahill A, Guise JM, Rouse D. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014 March; 123: p. 693-711.spa
dc.relation.references34 Sandall J, Tribe R, Avery L, Mola G, Visser G, Homer C, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. The Lancet. 2018; 392: p. 1349-1357.spa
dc.relation.references35 Keag O, Norman J, Stock S. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2018 January; 15(1): p. 1-22.spa
dc.relation.references36 Souza J, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010 December; 8(1): p. 1-71.spa
dc.relation.references37 Abenhaim H, Azoulay L, Kramer M, Leduc L. Incidence and risk factors of amniotic fluid embolisms: a population-based study on 3 million births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 July; 199(1).spa
dc.relation.references38 Blondon M, Casini A, Hoppe K, Boehlen F, Righini M, NL S. Risks of Venous Thromboembolism After Cesarean Sections: A Meta-Analysis. Chest Journal. 2016 September; 150(3): p. 572-596.spa
dc.relation.references39 Baaqeel H, Baaqeel R. Timing of administration of prophylactic antibiotics for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 May; 120(6): p. 661-669spa
dc.relation.references40 Silver R, Landon M, Rouse D, Leveno K, Spong C, Thom E. Maternal Morbidity Associated With Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 June; 107(6): p. 1226-1232spa
dc.relation.references41 Karlström A, Lindgren H, Hildingsson I. Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 March; 120(4): p. 479- 486spa
dc.relation.references42 Yee W, Amin H, Wood S. Elective Cesarean Delivery, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission, and Neonatal Respiratory Distress. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 April; 111(4): p. 823-828.spa
dc.relation.references43 Bosch A, Levin E, Van Houten M, Hasrat R, Kalkman G, Biesbroek G. evelopment of Upper Respiratory Tract Microbiota in Infancy is Affected by Mode of Delivery. EBioMedicine. 2016 July; 9: p. 336-345spa
dc.relation.references44 Schlinzig T, Johansson S, Gunnar A, Ekström T, Norman M. Epigenetic modulation at birth - altered DNA-methylation in white blood cells after Caesarean section. Acta Paediatr. 2009 July; 98(7): p. 1096-1099.spa
dc.relation.references45 Tribe R, Taylor P, Kelly N, Rees D, Sandall J, Kennedy H. Parturition and the perinatal period: can mode of delivery impact on the future health of the neonate? Journal Physiol. 2018 December; 596(23): p. 5709-5722.spa
dc.relation.references46 Aguilera S, Soothill P. Control prenatal antenatal care. Rev. Med. Clin. Condes. 2014; 26(6): p. 880-886.spa
dc.relation.references47 Ministerio de Salud. Lineamiento técnico y operativo de la ruta integral de atención en salud materno perinatal. Guía de salud. Bogotá: Gobierno de Colombia, Ministerio de Salud; 2018.spa
dc.relation.references48 Patel R, Peters T, Murphy D, Team AS. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12 944 women in England. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. 2005 January; 34: p. 353-367spa
dc.relation.references49 Tebeu P, Foumane P, Mbu R, Fosso G, Biyaga P, Fomulu J. Risk Factors for Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: A Report from the Maroua Regional Hospital, Cameroon. Journal Reprod Infertil. 2011; 12(3): p. 227-234.spa
dc.relation.references50 Bukhari, S. R., Gul, M., Asad, U., Yusuf, L., Israr, S., & Khurrum, A. (2022). Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 16(11), 887-887spa
dc.relation.references51 Dong, A. C., Morgan, J., Kane, M., Stagnaro-Green, A., & Stephenson, M. D. (2020). Subclinical hypothyroidism and thyroid autoimmunity in recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 113(3), 587-600.spa
dc.relation.references52 Danza Á, Ruiz-Irastorza GKM. El embarazo en las enfermedades autoinmunes sistémicas: mitos, certezas y dudas. Medicina Clínica Barcelona. 2016; 147(7): p. 306-312.spa
dc.relation.references53 Al Khalaf, S., Bodunde, E., Maher, G. M., O'Reilly, É. J., McCarthy, F. P., O'Shaughnessy, M. M., ... & Khashan, A. S. (2022). Chronic kidney disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 226(5), 656-670.spa
dc.relation.references54 Maulik, D., Chuy, V., & Kumar, S. (2022). Preexisting Thyroid Disease in Pregnancy: A Brief Overview. Missouri medicine, 119(4), 360-365.spa
dc.relation.references55 Egbe T, Badjang T, Tchounzou R, Egbe EN, Ngowe M. Uterine fibroids in pregnancy: prevalence, clinical presentation, associated factors and outcomes at the Limbe and Buea Regional Hospitals, Cameroon: a cross-sectional study. BMC Research Notes. 2018; 11(889): p. 1-6.spa
dc.relation.references56 Attali, E., & Yogev, Y. (2021). The impact of advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 70, 2-9.spa
dc.relation.references57 Santana D, Surita F, Cecatti J. Multiple Pregnancy: Epidemiology and Association with Maternal and Perinatal Morbidity. Thieme Revinter. 2018 May; 40(9): p. 554-562.spa
dc.relation.references58 McIntyre, H. D., Catalano, P., Zhang, C., Desoye, G., Mathiesen, E. R., & Damm, P. (2019). Gestational diabetes mellitus. Nature reviews Disease primers, 5(1), 47spa
dc.relation.references59 Turbeville, H. R., & Sasser, J. M. (2020). Preeclampsia beyond pregnancy: longterm consequences for mother and child. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, 318(6), F1315-F1326.spa
dc.relation.references60 Amorim M, Souza A, Katz L. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for severe pre-eclampsia. Cochrane Database Syst. 2017 October; 110.spa
dc.relation.references61 Rydahl, E., Declercq, E., Juhl, M., & Maimburg, R. D. (2019). Cesarean section on a rise—Does advanced maternal age explain the increase? A population register-based study. PloS one, 14(1), e0210655spa
dc.relation.references62 Pandey, A. K., Raushan, M. R., Gautam, D., & Neogi, S. B. (2023). Alarming Trends of Cesarean Section—Time to Rethink: Evidence From a Large-Scale 94 Cross-sectional Sample Survey in India. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e41892.spa
dc.relation.references63 Alshammari, R. F., Khan, F. H., Alkwai, H. M., Alenazi, F., Alshammari, K. F., Sogeir, E. K. A., ... & Khalid, A. A. (2023). Role of Parity and Age in Cesarean Section Rate among Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Hail, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1486.spa
dc.relation.references64 Hailu A, Fanta T, Welay F, Assefa N, Hadera S, Gebremeskel G, et al. Determinants of Cesarean Section Deliveries in Public Hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2018/19: A Case-Control Study. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2020 March;: p. 1-7.spa
dc.relation.references65 Seidu AA, Hagan J, Agbemavi W, Ahinkorah B, Nartey E, Budu E, et al. Not just numbers: beyond counting caesarean deliveries to understanding their determinants in Ghana using a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020; 20(114): p. 1-10.spa
dc.relation.references66 Weaver J, Statham H, Richards M. Are There ‘‘Unnecessary’’ Cesarean Sections? Perceptions of Women and Obstetricians bout Cesarean Sections for Nonclinical Indications. Birth Journal. 2007 March; 34(1): p. 32-41.spa
dc.relation.references67 Compton L. Common Factors in Unplanned Cesarean Section. The Eleanor Mann School of Nursing Undergraduate Honors Theses. 37. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas, Science in Nursing ; 2015.spa
dc.relation.references68 Cegolon L, Mastrangelo G, Maso G, Dal Pozzo L, Ronfani A, Cegolon W, et al. Understanding Factors Leading to Primary Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy, 2005–2015. Journal of Scientific Report. Nature research. 2020; 10(380).spa
dc.relation.references69 Gaber, K. F., & Hassan, H. K. (2023). Analysis of Cesarean Section Rates in Minia University Maternity and Child Hospital Using Robson Classification; A cross–section study. Minia Journal of Medical Researchspa
dc.relation.references70 Attali, E., Doleeb, Z., Hiersch, L., Amikam, U., Gamzu, R., Yogev, Y., & Ashwal, E. (2022). The risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery in advanced maternal age. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 35(25), 8019-8026.spa
dc.relation.references71 Dweik D. Non-medical factors in the background of cesarean sections in southeast hungary. Ph.D. Thesis. Szeged: Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2014.spa
dc.relation.references72 Ahmed, M. S., Islam, M., Jahan, I., & Shaon, I. F. (2023). Multilevel analysis to identify the factors associated with caesarean section in Bangladesh: evidence from a nationally representative survey. International Health, 15(1), 30-36.spa
dc.relation.references73 Wehberg S, Guldberg R, Gradel K, Kesmodel U, Munk L, Andersson CB, et al. Risk factors and between-hospital variation of caesarean section in Denmark: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2017 December; 8: p. 1-9.spa
dc.relation.references74 Thompson, B. B., Reddy, U. M., Burn, M., Abdel-Razeq, S., & Xu, X. (2022). Maternal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies after classical cesarean delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 140(2), 212-219.spa
dc.relation.references75 Tadevosyan M, Ghazaryan A, Harutyunyan A, Petrosyan V, Atherly A, Hekimian K. Factors contributing to rapidly increasing rates of cesarean section in Armenia: a partially mixed concurrent quantitative-qualitative equal status study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019; 19(2): p. 1-10spa
dc.relation.references76 Fateema K. Factors affecting the increased rates of caesarean section in bangladesh. Master Thesis. Ámsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam, KIT (ROYAL TROPICAL INSTITUTE); 2016 September.spa
dc.relation.references77 Millán M, Mendoza A. Factores relacionados con la cesárea primitiva. Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología. ; 36(3): p. 360-367.spa
dc.relation.references78 Gómez O, Carrasquilla G. Factors associated with unjustified Cesarean section in four hospitals in Cali, Colombia. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 1999; 11(5): p. 385–389.spa
dc.relation.references79 Suarez R. Factores de riesgo que condicionan parto por cesárea en nulíparas adolescentes. hospital santa maría del socorro ica. mayo – octubre 2015. Tesis de Grado. Ica: Universidad Alas Peruanas, Facultad de Medicina Humana y Ciencias de la Salud; 2016.spa
dc.relation.references80 Mero J. Evaluación de los criterios clinico quirurgicos para la realizacion de operacion cesarea por primera vez en pacientes gestantes hospital ginecoobstétrico enrique c. sotomayor 2010. Tesis de Grado. Guayquil: Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas; 2010.spa
dc.relation.references81 Loor G. Causas de primera cesárea en mujeres adolescentes primigestas y su relación con la etnia, en el servicio de ginecología del hospital san vicente de paúl de la ciudad de ibarra, en el período comprendido entre enero del 2017 a diciembre del 2017. Tesis de Grado. Quito: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Facultad de Medicina; 2018spa
dc.relation.references82 Contreras C, Matus A. Incidencia de cesárea en primigestas ingresadas en el servicio de Labor y Parto del Hospital Alemán Nicaragüense en el periodo comprendido del 01 de enero al 30 de junio del 2007. Tesis de Grado. León: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Nicaragua, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas; 2007.spa
dc.relation.references83 ACOG. Practice bulletin no134: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 September; 121(5): p. 1122–33.spa
dc.relation.references84 Rodriguez-Lopez, M., Correa-Avendaño, E. L., Martinez-Avila, A. M., & Merlo, J. (2021). Análisis multinivel del efecto del lugar de nacimiento en la proporción de partos por cesárea en Colombia. Colombia Médica, 52(3), e2044411- e2044411.spa
dc.relation.references85. Torre Arias, A. P. D. L. (2022). Epidemia de cesáreas en Colombia: percepciones del personal de salud involucrado en la atención del parto en Bogotá, Medellín y Barranquilla (2021).spa
dc.relation.references86. Rahman MM, Haider MR, Moinuddin M., Rahman AE, Ahmed S,KhanMM .Determinants of caesarean section in Bangladesh: Cross-sectional analysis of Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014 Data. PLoS ONE 13(9): e0202879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202879.spa
dc.relation.references87. Chávez, A. Y. R., Rogel, K. O. Z., & Sotomayor, J. D. R. R. (2023). Incidencia y principales indicaciones de cesárea en primigestas usuarias de un hospital de Machala. Polo del Conocimiento, 8(1), 1004-1018spa
dc.relation.references88. de Cesárea, r. t. Incidencia de cesáreas en la provincia de buenos aires: el caso del subsector público de salud y de las entidades primarias de facturacion de femeba años 2010 y 2019.spa
dc.relation.references89. Méndez Carangui, M. E., & Saldaña Tinizhañay, J. E. (2022). Factores Asociados a Cesárea. Revisión Sistemáticaspa
dc.relation.references90. Trends in cesarean delivery by country and wealth quintile: Cross-sectional surveys in southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. [https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/91/12/13-117598/en/].spa
dc.relation.references91. Barrera-Barrera, G., Cucoch-Petraello-Rojas, C., Martínez-Vera, I., Neira- Pérez, M., Órdenes-Osorio, S., Sandoval-Rubilar, S., ... & González-Burboa, A. (2022). Percepción de las vías del parto de mujeres en edad reproductiva: una 98 revisión de la literatura. Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecología, 87(2), 122- 136.spa
dc.relation.references92. Shabila, N. P. (2022). Trends and changes in cesarean delivery rates in Iraq: findings from the multiple indicator cluster surveys, 2011–2018. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 35(25), 6272-6277.spa
dc.relation.references93. Seidu AA, Hagan JE, Agbemavi W, Ahinkorah BO, Nartey EB, Budu E, et al. Not just numbers: Beyond counting caesarean deliveries to understanding their determinants in Ghana using a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 18;20(1).spa
dc.relation.references94. Guerrero Palomino, B. J. D. L. A. (2020). Obesidad pregestacional como factor de riesgo para parto por cesárea. Hospital Santa Rosa Piura 2019spa
dc.relation.references95. Ruipérez-Pacheco, E., Carmona-Payán, P., Blázquez-Barbero, E., & Herráiz- Martínez, M. Á. (2022). Influencia del sobrepeso y la obesidad pregestacionales en el embarazo y en los desenlaces perinatales. Ginecología y obstetricia de México, 90(5), 385-394.spa
dc.relation.references96. Dall'Asta, A., Ramirez Zegarra, R., Corno, E., Mappa, I., Lu, J. L. A., Di Pasquo, E.,& Ghi, T. (2023). Role of fetal head-circumference-to-maternal-height ratio in predicting Cesarean section for labor dystocia: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 61(1), 93-98.spa
dc.relation.references97. H. Litorp, A. Mgaya, C. K. Mbekenga, H. L. Kidanto, S. Johnsdotter y B. Essén, «Fear, blame and transparency: Obstetric caregivers' rationales for high caesarean section rates in a low-resource setting,» Social Science & Medicine, vol. 143, pp. 232-240, 2015.spa
dc.relation.references98. Barrera-Barrera G, Cucoch-Petraello-Rojas C, Martínez-Vera I, Neira-Pérez M, Órdenes-Osorio S, Sandoval-Rubilar S, et al. Perception regarding the delivery 99 routes of women in reproductive age: A literature review. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2022;87(2):122–36.spa
dc.relation.references99. A Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, MagannEF, Morrison JC, Kenney SP and Devoe LD. Limitations of Clinical and Sonographic Estimates of Birth Weight: Experiencewith 1034 Parturients. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist, 1998. Vol. 91 No. 1spa
dc.relation.references100. Kolkman DGE, Verhoeven CJM, Brinkhorst SJ, van der Post JAM, Pajkrt E, Opmeer BC, et al. The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review. Am J Perinatol. 2013 Sep;30(8):625–30.spa
dc.relation.references101 Campbell S. Fetal macrosomia: a problem in need of a policy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;43(1):3–10.spa
dc.relation.references102. Comas M, Cochs B, Martí L, Ruiz R, Maireles S, Costa J, et al. Ultrasound examination at term for predicting the outcome of delivery in women with a previous cesarean section. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2016;29(23):3870–4.spa
dc.relation.uriapolohttps://apolo.unab.edu.co/en/persons/miguel-enrique-ochoa-veraspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordsCaesarean sectionspa
dc.subject.keywordsRisk factor'sspa
dc.subject.keywordsBirth controlspa
dc.subject.keywordsGynecologyspa
dc.subject.keywordsObstetricsspa
dc.subject.keywordsMedical sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsOobstetric surgeryspa
dc.subject.keywordsDemographic characteristicsspa
dc.subject.keywordsMaternal health servicesspa
dc.subject.lembGinecologíaspa
dc.subject.lembObstetriciaspa
dc.subject.lembCiencias médicasspa
dc.subject.lembCirugía obstétricaspa
dc.subject.lembCaracterísticas demográficasspa
dc.subject.lembServicios de salud maternaspa
dc.subject.proposalCésarea primariaspa
dc.subject.proposalFactores de riesgospa
dc.subject.proposalControl prenatalspa
dc.titleFactores prenatales asociados a terminación del embarazo por césarea primaria, en el Instituto de Salud de Bucaramanga (ISABU): Análisis secundario del estudio Zikalliancespa
dc.title.translatedPrenatal factors associated with termination of pregnancy by primary caesarean section at the Bucaramanga Health Institute (ISABU): Secondary analysis of the Zikalliancee studyspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2023_Tesis.pdf
Tamaño:
1.01 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2023_Licencia.pdf
Tamaño:
274.69 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Licencia

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
829 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: