Comparación de fórmulas biométricas para el cálculo del poder del lente intraocular

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorTello Hernández, Alejandrospa
dc.contributor.advisorGalvis Ramírez, Virgiliospa
dc.contributor.advisorCamacho López, Paul Anthonyspa
dc.contributor.apolounabCamacho López, Paul Anthony [paul-anthony-camacho-lópez]
dc.contributor.authorFrederick Velásquez, Gabrielspa
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000323578;https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001009125*
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000552453*
dc.contributor.cvlacCamacho López, Paul Anthony [0000323578]
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?hl=es#user=-u8d7_QAAAAJ;https://scholar.google.es/citations?hl=es#user=puxZHKYAAAAJ*
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?hl=es&user=CZOaBDoAAAAJ*
dc.contributor.googlescholarCamacho López, Paul Anthony [OvqUoOAAAAAJ]
dc.contributor.linkedinCamacho López, Paul Anthony [paulcamachomdepi]
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6233-9582*
dc.contributor.orcidCamacho López, Paul Anthony [0000-0002-6233-9582]
dc.contributor.researchgatehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Camacho_Lopez*
dc.contributor.researchgatehttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Virgilio_Galvis*
dc.contributor.researchgateCamacho López, Paul Anthony [Paul_Camacho_Lopez]
dc.contributor.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=16047325700;https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=6603664598*
dc.contributor.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=55963715000*
dc.contributor.scopusCamacho López, Paul Anthony [16047325700]
dc.coverageBucaramanga (Colombia)spa
dc.coverage.campusUNAB Campus Bucaramangaspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-26T20:01:43Z
dc.date.available2020-06-26T20:01:43Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.degree.nameEspecialista en Oftalmologíaspa
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: La cirugía de catarata ha evolucionado en las últimas décadas para mejorar la recuperación visual y el grado de satisfacción de los pacientes. Con esto, han mejorado los resultados visuales y la finalidad de la cirugía de catarata. Actualmente existen diferentes fórmulas para el cálculo del poder de los lentes intraoculares. Objetivo: Determinar los errores de predicción absolutos de 12 fórmulas biométricas en ojos operados con lentes intraoculares multifocales (Restor). Metodología: Análisis secundario de un estudio observacional, analítico, retrospectivo. Se incluyeron ojos con longitud axial mayor de 22 mm, que fueron intervenidos de facoemulsificación con lente intraocular con al menos tres meses de seguimiento. Con el poder del lente efectivamente implantado se usaron 12 formulas biométricas. Resultados: El orden de clasificación consolidado del rendimiento de las fórmulas (mejor a peor) fue: Hill-RBF, T2 personalizada, T2, Barrett Universal II personalizada, Panacea, Holladay 1, Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Haigis, EVO, Holladay 1 personalizada, SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis personalizada, Olsen personalizada, Olsen, Olsen modificada, UniversIOL y Holladay 2. Conclusión: En el grupo total la fórmula que mejor desempeño tuvo fue la Hill- RBF. En el subgrupo de ojos menores de 23 mm la fórmula de Hill-RBF se mantuvo en un segundo lugar, por detrás de la T2, pero fue desplazada hasta un cuarto lugar en el grupo de ojos mayores o iguales de 23 mm, en los cuales la Barrett Universal II personalizada tomó el primer lugar.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishIntroduction: Cataract surgery has evolved in recent decades to improve visual recovery and the degree of patient satisfaction. With this, the visual results and the purpose of cataract surgery have improved. Currently there are different formulas for calculating the power of intraocular lenses. Objective: To determine the absolute prediction errors of 12 biometric formulas in eyes operated with multifocal intraocular lenses (Restor). Methodology: Secondary analysis of an observational, analytical, retrospective study. Eyes with an axial length greater than 22 mm were included, which underwent phacoemulsification with an intraocular lens with at least three months of follow-up. With the power of the lens effectively implanted, 12 biometric formulas were used. Results: The consolidated ranking order of formula performance (best to worst) was: Hill-RBF, Custom T2, T2, Custom Barrett Universal II, Panacea, Holladay 1, Barrett Universal II, SRK / T, Haigis, EVO, Custom Holladay 1, SRK / T, Hoffer Q, Custom Haigis, Custom Olsen, Olsen, Modified Olsen, UniversIOL, and Holladay 2. Conclusion: In the total group, the formula with the best performance was the Hill-RBF. In the subgroup of eyes smaller than 23 mm, the Hill-RBF formula remained in second place, behind T2, but was displaced to a fourth place in the group of eyes greater than or equal to 23 mm, in which the custom Barrett Universal II took first place.eng
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.learningmodalityModalidad Presencialspa
dc.description.tableofcontentsRESUMEN 10 1. INTRODUCCIÓN 11 2. PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA Y JUSTIFICACIÓN 12 3. MARCO TEÓRICO 13 4. ESTADO DEL ARTE 22 5. OBJETIVOS 25 5.1 GENERAL 25 5.2 ESPECÍFICOS 25 6. DISEÑO METODOLÓGICO 25 6.1 DISEÑO DEL ESTUDIO 26 6.2 POBLACIÓN Y TAMAÑO DE LA MUESTRA 26 6.3 CRITERIOS DE INCLUSIÓN 26 6.4 CRITERIOS DE EXCLUSIÓN 27 6.5 DEFINICIÓN DE VARIABLES 27 6.6 PROCEDIMIENTO Y RECOLECCIÓN DE DATOS 27 6.7 PLAN DE ANÁLISIS DE DATOS 28 7. CONSIDERACIONES ÉTICAS 29 8. RESULTADOS 30 9. DISCUSIÓN 35 10. LIMITACIONES 39 11. CONCLUSIÓN 40 BIBLIOGRAFÍA 42 ANEXOS 46spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/1788
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Oftalmologíaspa
dc.relation.referencesFrederick Velásquez, Gabriel (2018). Comparación de fórmulas biométricas para el cálculo del poder del lente intraocular. Bucaramanga (Colombia) : Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.relation.references1. Brick DC. Risk management lessons from a review of 168 cataract surgery claims. Surv Ophthalmol. 43(4):356-360.spa
dc.relation.references2. Ridley H. Intra-ocular acrylic lenses; a recent development in the surgery of cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 1952;36(3):113-122.spa
dc.relation.references3. Binkhorst CD. Results of implantation of intraocular lenses in unilateral aphakia. With special reference to the pupillary or iris clip lens--a new method of fixation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1960;49:703-710.spa
dc.relation.references4. Rushton R. The clinical measurement of the axial length of the living eye. Trans Am Soc Ophthalmol. 1938;58:136-142.spa
dc.relation.references5. Jansson F. Measurement of intraocular distances by ultrasound and comparison between optical and ultrasonic determinations of the depth of the anterior chamber. Acta Ophthalmol. 1963;41:25-61.spa
dc.relation.references6. Fyodorov SN, Kolonko A. Estimation of optical power of the intraocular lens. Vestn Oftalmol. 1967;4:27-31.spa
dc.relation.references7. Fyodorov SN, Galin MA, Linksz A. Calculation of the optical power of intraocular lenses. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975;14(8):625-628.spa
dc.relation.references8. Sanders D, Retzlaff J, Kraff M, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of the Binkhorst, Colenbrander, and SRK implant power prediction formulas. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1981;7(4):337-340.spa
dc.relation.references9. Duane TD, Jaeger EA, Tasman W. Optics of Intraocular Lenses. In: Duane’s Ophthalmology. Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.spa
dc.relation.references10. Sanders DR, Retzlaff J, Kraff MC. Comparison of the SRK II formula and other second generation formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14(2):136- 141.spa
dc.relation.references11. Hoffer KJ. IOL Power. SLACK Incorporated; 2011.spa
dc.relation.references12. Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL. Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(1):63-71. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.032.spa
dc.relation.references13. Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(3):333-340.spa
dc.relation.references14. Holladay JT, Gills JP, Leidlein J, Cherchio M. Achieving emmetropia in extremely short eyes with two piggyback posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(7):1118-1123.spa
dc.relation.references15. Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(6):700-712.spa
dc.relation.references16. Olsen T, Olesen H, Thim K, Corydon L. Prediction of postoperative intraocular lens chamber depth. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(5):587- 590.spa
dc.relation.references17. Shammas H. The Olsen Formula. In: Intraocular Lens Power Calculations. Thorofare: SLACK; 2004:223.spa
dc.relation.references18. Shammas H. The Haigis Formula. In: Intraocular Lens Power Calculations. Thorofare: SLACK; 2004:223.spa
dc.relation.references19. Haigis W. Intraocular lens calculation after refractive surgery for myopia: Haigis-L formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(10):1658-1663. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.029.spa
dc.relation.references20. Sheard RM, Smith GT, Cooke DL. Improving the prediction accuracy of the SRK/T formula: The T2 formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(11):1829- 1834. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.031.spa
dc.relation.references21. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14(1):17-24.spa
dc.relation.references22. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Ruiz RS, Lewis JW, Rosenthal H. Improving the predictability of intraocular lens power calculations. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill 1960). 1986;104(4):539-541.spa
dc.relation.references23. Knox Cartwright NE, Johnston RL, Jaycock PD, Tole DM, Sparrow JM. The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: when should IOLMaster biometric measurements be rechecked? Eye. 2010;24(5):894-900. doi:10.1038/eye.2009.196.spa
dc.relation.references24. Gale RP, Saldana M, Johnston RL, Zuberbuhler B, McKibbin M. Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery. Eye. 2009;23(1):149-152. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702954.spa
dc.relation.references25. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(5):472-485. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00879.x.spa
dc.relation.references26. Leaming D V. ASCRS. In: Practice Styles and Preferences of U.S. ASCRS Members—2012 Survey.; 2012.spa
dc.relation.references27. Waldron RG, Aaberg TM. A-Scan Biometry Ultrasound Principles, Ultrasound Biometry Instrumentation, Accuracy and Standard Dimensions. Medscape; 2016.spa
dc.relation.references28. Leaming D V. Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members--1999 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(6):913-921.spa
dc.relation.references29. Schelenz J, Kammann J. Comparison of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and implant power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989;15(4):425-428.spa
dc.relation.references30. Giers U, Epple C. Comparison of A-scan device accuracy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(2):235-242. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80737-7.spa
dc.relation.references31. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Coffman PG, Brown LK. Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry: outcomes analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(2):239-242.spa
dc.relation.references32. Narváez J, Cherwek DH, Stulting RD, et al. Comparing immersion ultrasound with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 39(1):30-34.spa
dc.relation.references33. Montés-Micó R, Carones F, Buttacchio A, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D. Comparison of Immersion Ultrasound, Partial Coherence Interferometry, and Low Coherence Reflectometry for Ocular Biometry in Cataract Patients. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(9):665-671. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20110202-01.spa
dc.relation.references34. Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, Kugelberg M, Zetterström C, Lundström M. Aiming for emmetropia after cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(7):1181-1186. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.035.spa
dc.relation.references35. Royal College of Ophthalmologists. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists Cataract Surgery Guidelines.; 2010.spa
dc.relation.references36. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Cataract in the Adult Eye.; 2011.spa
dc.relation.references37. Cooke DL, Cooke TL. Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(8):1157-1164. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.029.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordsSurgeryeng
dc.subject.keywordsIntraocular lenseseng
dc.subject.keywordsEye diseaseseng
dc.subject.keywordsWaterfalleng
dc.subject.keywordsMedicineeng
dc.subject.keywordsOphthalmologyeng
dc.subject.keywordsResearcheng
dc.subject.keywordsIntraocular lens formulaeng
dc.subject.keywordsBiometricseng
dc.subject.keywordsAbsolute prediction errorseng
dc.subject.lembCirugíaspa
dc.subject.lembLentes intraocularesspa
dc.subject.lembEnfermedades de los ojosspa
dc.subject.lembCatarataspa
dc.subject.lembMedicinaspa
dc.subject.lembOftalmologíaspa
dc.subject.lembInvestigacionesspa
dc.subject.proposalBiometría
dc.subject.proposalFórmula de lente intraocular
dc.subject.proposalErrores de predicción absolutos
dc.titleComparación de fórmulas biométricas para el cálculo del poder del lente intraocularspa
dc.title.translatedComparison of biometric formulas for calculating the power of the intraocular lenseng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
2018_Tesis_Gabriel_Frederick_Velasquez.pdf
Tamaño:
1.2 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2018_Licencia_Gabriel_Frederick_Velasquez.pdf
Tamaño:
728.32 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Licencia
Descargar

Colecciones

Especialización en Oftalmología