Asociación entre la multiplicidad del embarazo y anomalías congénitas en el recién nacido: Estudio de casos-controles de base poblacional

dc.contributor.advisorBeltran Avendaño, Mónica Andrea
dc.contributor.advisorHerrera Galindo, Víctor Mauricio
dc.contributor.apolounabHerrera Galindo, Víctor Mauricio [víctor-mauricio-herrera-galindo]spa
dc.contributor.apolounabBeltrán Avendaño, Mónica Andrea [mónica-andrea-beltrán-avendaño]spa
dc.contributor.authorRubio Duarte, Andrés Felipe
dc.contributor.cvlacRubio Duarte, Andrés Felipe [0001774484]spa
dc.contributor.cvlacHerrera Galindo, Víctor Mauricio [0000068020]spa
dc.contributor.cvlacBeltrán Avendaño, Mónica Andrea [0000423319]spa
dc.contributor.googlescholarRubio Duarte, Andrés Felipe [WII30IAAAAJ&hl=es]spa
dc.contributor.googlescholarHerrera Galindo, Víctor Mauricio [es&oi=ao]spa
dc.contributor.orcidRubio Duarte, Andrés Felipe [0000-0001-9091-5367]spa
dc.contributor.orcidBeltrán Avendaño, Mónica Andrea [0000-0001-6973-9557]spa
dc.contributor.researchgateRubio Duarte, Andrés Felipe [Felipe-Rubio-Duarte]spa
dc.contributor.researchgateBeltrán Avendaño, Mónica Andrea [Monica-Andrea-Beltran-Avendano-2194091127]spa
dc.coverage.campusUNAB Campus Bucaramangaspa
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaspa
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-28T16:48:54Z
dc.date.available2023-06-28T16:48:54Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-15
dc.degree.nameMagíster en Métodos para la Producción y Aplicación de Conocimiento Científico en Saludspa
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: Los defectos congénitos son un problema de salud pública, anualmente se registran en Colombia alrededor de 3000 casos. Se estima que un 94% de los casos se presentan en países de bajos-medianos ingresos, como Colombia. Tienen una gran carga de morbimortalidad perinatal, causan 1 de cada 5 muertes en recién nacidos. El embarazo múltiple también tiene un impacto negativo en la salud de la gestante y el recién nacido, incrementando el riesgo de aborto, óbito fetal, parto prematuro, trastornos hipertensivos asociados al embarazo y muerte perinatal. La presencia de defectos congénitos en el embarazo múltiple puede aumentar la morbimortalidad materna y perinatal. Metodología: Estudio tipo casos-controles basado en datos secundarios anonimizados de registros de la ficha de notificación para defectos congénitos del Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica (SIVIGILA) en el periodo 2016-2021. Los casos fueron todos los recién nacidos elegibles con diagnóstico de anomalía congénita utilizando la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades 10ª edición CIE- 10; los controles fueron los recién nacidos vivos registrados en el Departamento Nacional de Estadística (DANE), nacidos en el mismo año y municipio del caso, escogidos aleatoriamente en relación 1:1. Inicialmente fue realizado un análisis descriptivo. Se estimó la prevalencia para el periodo a nivel nacional y por departamentos de todas las anomalías congénitas y para los siguientes grupos: cardiovascular, neurológica, genitales, labio leporino y paladar hendido. El denominador para el cálculo corresponde a la totalidad de nacidos vivos, registrados en el DANE, a nivel nacional y por departamentos. Se graficaron en un mapa geográfico mediante el uso de GeoDa®. Posteriormente se realizó una descripción de los casos y controles en función de la multiplicidad del embarazo y grupo etario materno. Los casos fueron caracterizados de acuerdo al número de anomalías registradas y el grupo CIE-10 al cual pertenecen. Se construyó un modelo de regresión logística condicionada por municipio de residencia y año de registro, estimando el OR con un IC95% de la asociación entre el embarazo múltiple y las anomalías congénitas, estimando el efecto confusor de la edad materna, tratada como variable discreta. El análisis fue realizado en el programa estadístico R. Resultados: Para el periodo de estudio hubo un total de 3,213,606 nacidos vivos reportados ante el DANE y 34,108 casos de anomalías congénitas tipo malformación reportados en el SIVIGILA, con una prevalencia general de 106.1 (IC95%: 105-107.3) casos por cada 10,000 nacidos vivos (nv). Las anomalías cardiovasculares, del sistema urinario, neurológicas y el labio-paladar hendido tienen una mayor prevalencia en la región andina y el centro del país; los departamentos de Santander, Antioquia y Boyacá concentran la mayor prevalencia de este grupo de anomalías. Se parearon un 95.8% de los casos. La prevalencia de embarazo múltiple fue de 2.8%, siendo más frecuente en los recién nacidos con anomalía congénita (4.2%) que en los controles (1.4%) siendo esta una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p<0.05). El resultado del modelo de regresión logística condicional estima una mayor probabilidad de cualquier anomalía congénita en el embarazo múltiple con respecto al embarazo único (OR=3.16, IC95%: 2.8-3.5), relación que se mantiene luego de incorporar el grupo etario materno en el modelo (OR=3.09, IC95%: 2.8-3.4), siendo la de mayor magnitud la observada para el grupo de anomalías no clasificadas (OR=10.9, IC95%: 4.9-24.3), sistema respiratorio (OR=3.88, IC95%: 1.8-8.6), cardiovascular (OR=3.69, IC95%: 2.9-4.6) y las anomalías genitales (OR=3.32, IC95%: 1.9-5.8). Conclusiones: El embarazo múltiple se asocia a una mayor probabilidad de anomalías congénitas en el recién nacido, independiente del grupo de anomalía y la edad materna. La probabilidad de anomalía congénita en embarazo múltiple aumenta proporcional a la edad materna. Los resultados son concordantes con estudios en población asiática y americana. La distribución de las anomalías congénitas en Colombia es heterogénea con una mayor tasa en la región Andina y centro para cardiopatías, anomalías del sistema nervioso, urinario, neurológico y labio-paladar hendido.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishIntroduction: Congenital defects are a public health problem, with approximately 3,000 cases reported annually in Colombia. It is estimated that 94% of cases occur in low-to-middle-income countries like Colombia. They impose a significant burden of perinatal morbidity and mortality, accounting for 1 in 5 deaths among newborns. Multiple pregnancies also have a negative impact on the health of both the mother and the newborn, increasing the risk of abortion, fetal death, preterm birth, pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders, and perinatal death. The presence of congenital defects in multiple pregnancies can further increase maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Methodology: A case-control study was conducted based on anonymized secondary data from the Congenital Defect Notification Form of the National Epidemiological Surveillance System (SIVIGILA) for the period 2016-2021. Cases included all eligible newborns diagnosed with a congenital anomaly using the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), while controls were live births registered in the National Department of Statistics (DANE), born in the same year and municipality as the cases, randomly selected in a 1:1 ratio. Initially, a descriptive analysis was performed. The prevalence for the entire period was estimated at the national level and by department for all congenital anomalies and the following groups: cardiovascular, neurological, genital, cleft lip, and cleft palate. The denominator for the calculation corresponded to the total number of live births registered in DANE, nationally and by department. GeoDa® software was used to graphically represent the data on a geographic map. Subsequently, cases and controls were described according to the multiplicity of pregnancy and maternal age group. The cases were characterized based on the number of registered anomalies and their corresponding ICD-10 group. A conditional logistic regression model was constructed by municipality of residence and year of registration, estimating the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between multiple pregnancy and congenital anomalies, considering maternal age as a discrete variable. The analysis was conducted using the R statistical software. Results: During the study period, a total of 3,213,606 live births were reported to DANE, and 34,108 cases of congenital anomalies were reported in SIVIGILA, resulting in a general prevalence of 106.1 (95% CI: 105-107.3) cases per 10,000 live births. Cardiovascular, urinary system, neurological, and cleft lip/palate anomalies had a higher prevalence in the Andean region and central Colombia. The departments of Santander, Antioquia, and Boyacá had the highest prevalence of these anomaly groups. A total of 95.8% of the cases were matched with controls. The prevalence of multiple pregnancies was 2.8%, being more frequent in newborns with congenital anomalies (4.2%) than in controls (1.4%), with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). The conditional logistic regression model estimated a higher probability of any congenital anomaly in multiple pregnancies compared to singleton pregnancies (OR=3.16, 95% CI: 2.8-3.5). This association remained significant after incorporating maternal age group into the model (OR=3.09, 95% CI: 2.8-3.4). The highest magnitude of association was observed for the group of unclassified anomalies (OR=10.9, 95% CI: 4.9-24.3), followed by respiratory system (OR=3.88, 95% CI: 1.8-8.6), cardiovascular (OR=3.69, 95% CI: 2.9-4.6), and genital anomalies (OR=3.32, 95% CI: 1.9-5.8). Conclusions: Multiple pregnancy is associated with a higher probability of congenital anomalies in newborns, regardless of the anomaly group or maternal age. The probability of congenital anomalies in multiple pregnancies increases proportionally with maternal age. The results are consistent with studies conducted in Asian and American populations. The distribution of congenital anomalies in Colombia is heterogeneous, with higher rates in the Andean and central regions for heart defects, nervous system abnormalities, urinary system anomalies, neurological anomalies, and cleft lip/palate.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.learningmodalityModalidad Presencialspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29375/tesis.20350
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/20350
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Métodos para la Producción y Aplicación de Conocimiento Científico en Saludspa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Orgnaization. Congenital anomalies [Internet]. Health topics: Congenital anomalies. 2022 [cited 2022 Jun 30]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/congenital-anomalies#tab=tab_1spa
dc.relation.references2. Feldkamp ML, Carey JC, Byrne JLB, Krikov S, Botto LD. Etiology and clinical presentation of birth defects: population based study. BMJ. 2017 May 30;j2249.spa
dc.relation.references3. Sitkin NA, Ozgediz D, Donkor P, Farmer DL. Congenital anomalies in low- and middle-income countries: the unborn child of global surgery. World J Surg. 2015 Jan;39(1):36–40.spa
dc.relation.references4. Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Banco Mundial. Present and Future of Birth Defects Surveillance in the Americas. In: Present and Future of Birth Defects Surveillance in the Americas. 1st ed. Washington, D.C; 2020. p. 5–11.spa
dc.relation.references5. Cornel M. Wealth and health in relation to birth defects mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health (1978). 2000 Sep 1;54(9):644–644.spa
dc.relation.references6. Todros T, Capuzzo E, Gaglioti P. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Images Paediatr Cardiol. 2001 Apr;3(2):3–18.spa
dc.relation.references7. Tudorache DRES. Management of Pregnancy and Delivery in Prenatally Diagnosed Congenital Anomalies. In: Congenital Anomalies [Internet]. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2017. p. Ch. 22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71802spa
dc.relation.references8. Collins J. Global epidemiology of multiple birth. Reprod Biomed Online [Internet]. 2007;15:45–52. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648310622511spa
dc.relation.references9. Smith LK, Manktelow BN, Draper ES, Boyle EM, Johnson SJ, Field DJ. Trends in the incidence and mortality of multiple births by socioeconomic deprivation and maternal age in England: population-based cohort study. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2014 Apr 1;4(4):e004514. Available from: http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/4/e004514.abstractspa
dc.relation.references10. Mackie F, Morris K, Kilby M. Multiple Gestation: biology and epidemiology. In: The Global Library of Women’s Medicine’s. 1st ed. London: David Bloomer ; 2016. p. 15–8.spa
dc.relation.references11. Black M, Bhattacharya S. Epidemiology of multiple pregnancy and the effect of assisted conception. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Dec;15(6):306–12.spa
dc.relation.references12. Russell RB, Petrini JR, Damus K, Mattison DR, Schwarz RH. The changing epidemiology of multiple births in the United States. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2003 Jan;101(1):129–35.spa
dc.relation.references13. Kalikkot Thekkeveedu R, Dankhara N, Desai J, Klar AL, Patel J. Outcomes of multiple gestation births compared to singleton: analysis of multicenter KID database. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2021 Dec 28;7(1):15.spa
dc.relation.references14. Dudenhausen JW, Maier RF. Perinatal Problems in Multiple Births. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Sep 24;spa
dc.relation.references15. Cheong-See F, Schuit E, Arroyo-Manzano D, Khalil A, Barrett J, Joseph KS, et al. Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016 Sep 6;i4353.spa
dc.relation.references16. Boklage CE. Traces of embryogenesis are the same in monozygotic and dizygotic twins: not compatible with double ovulation. Human Reproduction. 2009 Jun 1;24(6):1255–66.spa
dc.relation.references17. Prabhcharan G, Lende M, van Hook JW. Twin Births [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 14]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493200/?report=classicspa
dc.relation.references18. García Acero M, Plata S. Caracterización de las anomalías congénitas desde la inclusión en el sistema de vigilancia Sivigila en Colombia, 2010-2013. Universitas Médica. 2017 Apr 1;58(1).spa
dc.relation.references19. González González NO. Protocolo de Vigilancia en Salud Pública de Defectos Congénitos. Bogota DC; 2022 Jan.spa
dc.relation.references20. Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, Bhide A, Gratacos E, Hecher K, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016 Feb;47(2):247–63.spa
dc.relation.references21. D’Addario V, Rossi C. Diagnosis of chorionicity: The role of ultrasound. Diagnóstico Prenatal. 2014 Jul;25(2):58–64.spa
dc.relation.references22. Townsend R, Khalil A. Ultrasound surveillance in twin pregnancy: An update for practitioners. Ultrasound. 2018 Nov 22;26(4):193–205.spa
dc.relation.references23. Joint WHO-March of Dimes Meeting on Management of Birth Defects and Haemoglobin Disorders (2nd : 2006 : Geneva S, Organization WH, Dimes M of. Management of birth defects and haemoglobin disorders : report of a joint WHO-March of Dimes meeting, Geneva, Switzerland, 17-19 May 2006 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43587spa
dc.relation.references24. World Health Organization, International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Birth defects surveillance: a manual for programme managers. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Geneva; 2014. 1–126 p.spa
dc.relation.references25. Cunningham FG, Williams JW. Williams obstetrics. 23rd ed. / [edite... Cunningham FG, Williams JW (John W, editors. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division; 2010.spa
dc.relation.references26. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Results [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Jul 25]. Available from: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/.spa
dc.relation.references27. Oumer M, Demissie Kassahun A. Birth prevalence of encephalocele in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021 Dec 7;5(1):e001117.spa
dc.relation.references28. Wonkam A. The Burden of Birth Defects and Genetic Disease in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Genomics and Health in the Developing World. Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 421–43.spa
dc.relation.references29. Cardoso-dos-Santos AC, Magalhães VS, Medeiros-de-Souza AC, Bremm JM, Alves RFS, Araujo VEM de, et al. Redes internacionais de colaboração para a vigilância das anomalias congênitas: uma revisão narrativa. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2020 Jul;29(4).spa
dc.relation.references30. Sié A, Hanefeld J, Chaponda M, Chico RM, LeDoare K, Mayaud P, et al. Congenital malformations in sub-Saharan Africa—warnings of a silent epidemic? Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 May;21(5):594–6.spa
dc.relation.references31. Avila Mellizo GA. Defectos Congénitos Colombia 2018. Bogota DC; 2018.spa
dc.relation.references32. United Nations Development Programme. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Sep 14]. Available from: https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals#:~:text=The%20Sustainable%20Development%20Goals%20(SDGs)%2C%20also%20known%20as%20the,people%20enjoy%20peace%20and%20prosperity.spa
dc.relation.references33. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible - OPS/OMS Material científico técnico [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Sep 3]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/es/temas/determinantes-ambientales-salud/objetivos-desarrollo-sostenible-opsoms-material-cientificospa
dc.relation.references34. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Agenda de Salud Sostenible para las Américas 2018-2030 [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Aug 12]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/es/agenda-salud-sostenible-para-americas-2018-2030spa
dc.relation.references35. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución número 1035 de 2022. 1035 Colombia; Jun 22, 2022 p. 51–70.spa
dc.relation.references36. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Comisión sobre Determinantes Sociales de la Salud . Geneva; 2008.spa
dc.relation.references37. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Determinantes sociales de la salud [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2022 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/es/temas/determinantes-sociales-saludspa
dc.relation.references38. Littleton HL, Bye K, Buck K, Amacker A. Psychosocial stress during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010 Nov 2;31(4):219–28.spa
dc.relation.references39. Class QA, Lichtenstein P, Långström N, D’Onofrio BM. Timing of Prenatal Maternal Exposure to Severe Life Events and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Population Study of 2.6 Million Pregnancies. Psychosom Med. 2011 Apr;73(3):234–41.spa
dc.relation.references40. Martini J, Knappe S, Beesdo-Baum K, Lieb R, Wittchen HU. Anxiety disorders before birth and self-perceived distress during pregnancy: Associations with maternal depression and obstetric, neonatal and early childhood outcomes. Early Hum Dev. 2010 May;86(5):305–10.spa
dc.relation.references41. Khashan AS, McNamee R, Abel KM, Mortensen PB, Kenny LC, Pedersen MG, et al. Rates of preterm birth following antenatal maternal exposure to severe life events: a population-based cohort study. Human Reproduction. 2009 Feb 1;24(2):429–37.spa
dc.relation.references42. Hedegaard M, Henriksen TB, Secher NJ, Hatch MC, Sabroe S. Do Stressful Life Events Affect Duration of Gestation and Risk of Preterm Delivery? Epidemiology. 1996 Jul;7(4):339–45.spa
dc.relation.references43. Christianson A, Howson C, Modell B. Global Report of Birth Defects. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, editor. Vol. 1. New York; 2006. 14–34 p.spa
dc.relation.references44. Vrijheid M. Socioeconomic inequalities in risk of congenital anomaly. Arch Dis Child. 2000 May 1;82(5):349–52.spa
dc.relation.references45. Larson CP. Poverty during pregnancy: Its effects on child health outcomes. Paediatr Child Health. 2007 Oct;12(8):673–7.spa
dc.relation.references47. Kucik JE, Nembhard WN, Donohue P, Devine O, Wang Y, Minkovitz CS, et al. Community socioeconomic disadvantage and the survival of infants with congenital heart defects. Am J Public Health. 2014 Nov;104(11):e150-7.spa
dc.relation.references48. Xiang L, Su Z, Liu Y, Zhang X, Li S, Hu S, et al. Effect of family socioeconomic status on the prognosis of complex congenital heart disease in children: an observational cohort study from China. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Jun;2(6):430–9.spa
dc.relation.references49. Pawluk MS, Campaña H, Gili JA, Comas B, Giménez LG, Villalba MI, et al. Adverse social determinants and risk for congenital anomalies. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2014;112(3):215–23.spa
dc.relation.references51. Bejarano J. Pobreza multidimensional en Colombia: las cifras de 2021 muestran una mejoría. 2021 [cited 2022 Sep 15]; Available from: https://www.elespectador.com/economia/macroeconomia/pobreza-multidimensional-en-colombia-las-cifras-de-2021-muestran-una-mejoria/spa
dc.relation.references51. Bejarano J. Pobreza multidimensional en Colombia: las cifras de 2021 muestran una mejoría. 2021 [cited 2022 Sep 15]; Available from: https://www.elespectador.com/economia/macroeconomia/pobreza-multidimensional-en-colombia-las-cifras-de-2021-muestran-una-mejoria/spa
dc.relation.references52. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Metodología: Índice de Pobreza Multidimensional (IPM) [Internet]. Bogota; 2014 [cited 2022 Sep 5]. Available from: http://microdatos.dane.gov.co/index.php/catalog/330/related_materialsspa
dc.relation.references53. Callander EJ, Schofield DJ, Shrestha RN. Chronic health conditions and poverty: a cross-sectional study using a multidimensional poverty measure. BMJ Open. 2013 Nov;3(11):e003397.spa
dc.relation.references54. Peyvandi S, Baer RJ, Chambers CD, Norton ME, Rajagopal S, Ryckman KK, et al. Environmental and Socioeconomic Factors Influence the Live‐Born Incidence of Congenital Heart Disease: A Population‐Based Study in California. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 21;9(8).spa
dc.relation.references55. Smith LK, Manktelow BN, Draper ES, Boyle EM, Johnson SJ, Field DJ. Trends in the incidence and mortality of multiple births by socioeconomic deprivation and maternal age in England: population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2014 Apr;4(4):e004514.spa
dc.relation.references56. Collins J. Global epidemiology of multiple birth. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Jan;15:45–52.spa
dc.relation.references57. Lee KS, Choi YJ, Cho J, Lee H, Lee H, Park SJ, et al. Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors of Congenital Anomalies: an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(28).spa
dc.relation.references58. Ekelund CK, Skibsted L, Søgaard K, Main KM, Dziegiel MH, Schwartz M, et al. Dizygotic monochorionic twin pregnancy conceived following intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment and complicated by twin-twin transfusion syndrome and blood chimerism. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008 Nov;32(6):832–4.spa
dc.relation.references59. Santana DS, Silveira C, Costa ML, Souza RT, Surita FG, Souza JP, et al. Perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies complicated by maternal morbidity: evidence from the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):449.spa
dc.relation.references46. American Heart Association News. Congenital heart disease linked to neighborhood pollution, poverty. 2019.spa
dc.relation.references60. Dudenhausen JW, Maier RF. Perinatal Problems in Multiple Births. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Sep 24;spa
dc.relation.references61. Wen SW, Demissie K, Yang Q, Walker MC. Maternal morbidity and obstetric complications in triplet pregnancies and quadruplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):254–8.spa
dc.relation.references62. Sairam S. Prospective risk of stillbirth in multiple-gestation pregnancies: a population-based analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2002 Oct;100(4):638–41.spa
dc.relation.references63. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Draft quality standard for multiple pregnancy. 2013.spa
dc.relation.references64. Lemos E v., Zhang D, van Voorhis BJ, Hu XH. Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;209(6):586.e1-586.e11.spa
dc.relation.references65. Vogel JP, Torloni MR, Seuc A, Betrán AP, Widmer M, Souza JP, et al. Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of Twin Pregnancy in 23 Low- and Middle-Income Countries. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 1;8(8):e70549.spa
dc.relation.references66. Smits J, Monden C. Twinning across the Developing World. PLoS One. 2011 Sep 28;6(9):e25239.spa
dc.relation.references67. Jonsson H, Magnusdottir E, Eggertsson HP, Stefansson OA, Arnadottir GA, Eiriksson O, et al. Differences between germline genomes of monozygotic twins. Nat Genet. 2021 Jan 7;53(1):27–34.spa
dc.relation.references68. Lancaster PAL. Causes of birth defects: Lessons from history. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2011 Mar;51(1):2–5.spa
dc.relation.references69. Vargesson N. Thalidomide‐induced teratogenesis: History and mechanisms. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2015 Jun 4;105(2):140–56.spa
dc.relation.references70. Harris BS, Bishop KC, Kemeny HR, Walker JS, Rhee E, Kuller JA. Risk Factors for Birth Defects. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017 Feb;72(2):123–35.spa
dc.relation.references71. Centro Nacional de Defectos Congénitos y Discapacidades del Desarrollo. Guía para prevenir defectos de nacimiento [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 15]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/Spanish/birthdefects/prevention.htmlspa
dc.relation.references72. Kancherla V, Botto LD, Rowe LA, Shlobin NA, Caceres A, Arynchyna-Smith A, et al. Preventing birth defects, saving lives, and promoting health equity: an urgent call to action for universal mandatory food fortification with folic acid. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jul;10(7):e1053–7.spa
dc.relation.references73. Czeizel AE. Birth Defects Are Preventable. Int J Med Sci. 2005;91–2.spa
dc.relation.references74. Howley MM, Browne ML, van Zutphen AR, Richardson SD, Blossom SJ, Broussard CS, et al. Maternal autoimmune disease and birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016 Nov;106(11):950–62.spa
dc.relation.references75. Parimi M, Nitsch D. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diabetes During Pregnancy and Congenital Genitourinary Abnormalities. Kidney Int Rep. 2020 May;5(5):678–93.spa
dc.relation.references76. Zhang TN, Huang XM, Zhao XY, Wang W, Wen R, Gao SY. Risks of specific congenital anomalies in offspring of women with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies including over 80 million births. PLoS Med. 2022 Feb 1;19(2):e1003900.spa
dc.relation.references77. Rohde C, Thiele AG, Baerwald C, Ascherl RG, Lier D, Och U, et al. Preventing maternal phenylketonuria (PKU) syndrome: important factors to achieve good metabolic control throughout pregnancy. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Dec 18;16(1):477.spa
dc.relation.references78. Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, Dai J, Liu Y, Xia Y, et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012 Jun;97(6):1331-1337.e4.spa
dc.relation.references79. Zheng Z, Chen L, Yang T, Yu H, Wang H, Qin J. Multiple pregnancies achieved with IVF/ICSI and risk of specific congenital malformations: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Apr;36(4):472–82.spa
dc.relation.references80. Massaro PA, MacLellan DL, Anderson PA, Romao RLP. Does Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Pose an Increased Risk of Genitourinary Congenital Malformations in Offspring Compared to In Vitro Fertilization? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Urology. 2015 May;193(5S):1837–42.spa
dc.relation.references81. Lacamara C, Ortega C, Villa S, Pommer R, Schwarze JE. Are children born from singleton pregnancies conceived by ICSI at increased risk for congenital malformations when compared to children conceived naturally? A systematic review and meta-analysis. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21(3).spa
dc.relation.references82. Yu D, Feng Y, Yang L, Da M, Fan C, Wang S, et al. Maternal Socioeconomic Status and the Risk of Congenital Heart Defects in Offspring: A Meta-Analysis of 33 Studies. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 27;9(10):e111056.spa
dc.relation.references83. Deguen S, Kihal W, Jeanjean M, Padilla C, Zmirou-Navier D. Neighborhood Deprivation and Risk of Congenital Heart Defects, Neural Tube Defects and Orofacial Clefts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 26;11(10):e0159039.spa
dc.relation.references84. Anyanwu LJC, Ade-Ajayi N, Rolle U. Major abdominal wall defects in the low- and middle-income setting: current status and priorities. Pediatr Surg Int. 2020 May 21;36(5):579–90.spa
dc.relation.references85. Vu GH, Warden C, Zimmerman CE, Kalmar CL, Humphries LS, McDonald-McGinn DM, et al. Poverty and Risk of Cleft Lip and Palate: An Analysis of United States Birth Data. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jan 21;149(1):169–82.spa
dc.relation.references86. Prescott KR, Wilkie AOM. Genetic aspects of birth defects: new understandings of old problems. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Jan 24;92(4):F308–14.spa
dc.relation.references87. Hobbs CA, Chowdhury S, Cleves MA, Erickson S, MacLeod SL, Shaw GM, et al. Genetic Epidemiology and Nonsyndromic Structural Birth Defects. JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Apr 1;168(4):371.spa
dc.relation.references88. Akhtar F, Bokhari S. Down Syndrome [Internet]. 1st ed. Vol. 1. 2021 [cited 2022 Sep 9]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526016/spa
dc.relation.references89. Coppedè F. Risk factors for Down syndrome. Arch Toxicol. 2016 Dec 7;90(12):2917–29.spa
dc.relation.references90. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. 2004 [cited 2022 Sep 15]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42980/9241546530_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yspa
dc.relation.references91. DANE. Geovisor de Consulta de Codificación de la Divipola [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 12]. Available from: https://geoportal.dane.gov.co/geovisores/territorio/consulta-divipola-division-politico-administrativa-de-colombia/spa
dc.relation.references92. Norwitz ER, Edusa V, Park JS. Maternal Physiology and Complications of Multiple Pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2005 Oct;29(5):338–48.spa
dc.relation.references93. Soma-Pillay P, Nelson-Piercy C, Tolppanen H, Mebazaa A. Physiological changes in pregnancy. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016 May 18;27(2):89–94.spa
dc.relation.references94. Lee KS, Choi YJ, Cho J, Lee H, Lee H, Park SJ, et al. Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors of Congenital Anomalies: an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(28).spa
dc.relation.references95. Toufaily MH, Westgate MN, Lin AE, Holmes LB. Causes of Congenital Malformations. Birth Defects Res. 2018 Jan;110(2):87–91.spa
dc.relation.references96. Verma RP. Evaluation and Risk Assessment of Congenital Anomalies in Neonates. Children. 2021 Sep 28;8(10):862.spa
dc.relation.references97. Gijtenbeek M, Shirzada MR, Ten Harkel ADJ, Oepkes D, C. Haak M. Congenital Heart Defects in Monochorionic Twins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 24;8(6):902.spa
dc.relation.references98. Panagiotopoulou O, Fouzas S, Sinopidis X, Mantagos SP, Dimitriou G, Karatza AA. Congenital heart disease in twins: The contribution of type of conception and chorionicity. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep;218:144–9.spa
dc.relation.references99. Gijtenbeek M, Shirzada MR, Ten Harkel ADJ, Oepkes D, C. Haak M. Congenital Heart Defects in Monochorionic Twins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 24;8(6):902.spa
dc.relation.references100. Ahn D, Kim J, Kang J, Kim YH, Kim K. Congenital anomalies and maternal age: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 May 14;101(5):484–98.spa
dc.relation.references103. Chen X, Lou H, Chen L, Muhuza MPU, Chen D, Zhang X. Epidemiology of birth defects in teenage pregnancies: Based on provincial surveillance system in eastern China. Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;10.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrabhcharan G, Lende M, van Hook JW. Twin Births [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 14]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493200/?report=classicspa
dc.relation.uriapolohttps://apolo.unab.edu.co/en/persons/v%C3%ADctor-mauricio-herrera-galindospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordsMultiple pregancyspa
dc.subject.keywordsCongenital anomalyspa
dc.subject.keywordsNewbornspa
dc.subject.keywordsMedical sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsHuman abnormalitiesspa
dc.subject.keywordsAbnormalities in the fetusspa
dc.subject.keywordsMultiple pregnancyspa
dc.subject.keywordsPregnancy periodspa
dc.subject.lembCiencias médicasspa
dc.subject.lembAnormalidades humanasspa
dc.subject.lembAnormalidades en el fetospa
dc.subject.lembEmbarazo múltiplespa
dc.subject.lembPeriodo de embarazospa
dc.subject.proposalEmbarazo múltiplespa
dc.subject.proposalAnomalía congénitaspa
dc.subject.proposalRecién nacidospa
dc.titleAsociación entre la multiplicidad del embarazo y anomalías congénitas en el recién nacido: Estudio de casos-controles de base poblacionalspa
dc.title.translatedAssociation between pregnancy multiplicity and congenital anomalies in newborns: a Population-Based case-control study.spa
dc.typeThesiseng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.localTesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2023_Tesis_Andres_Felipe_Rubio.pdf
Tamaño:
1.49 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2023_Licencia_Andres_Felipe_Rubio.pdf
Tamaño:
189.19 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Licencia

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
829 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: