Costo-efectividad de las intervenciones de enfermería para el manejo de úlceras por pie diabético: revisión sistemática

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorVásquez Hernández, Skarlet Marcell
dc.contributor.authorRico Ardila, Dayana Lizeth
dc.contributor.authorGómez Camargo, Lesly Nathali
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Quintero, Lynda María
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-24T15:16:26Z
dc.date.available2024-07-24T15:16:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-09
dc.description.abstractLas intervenciones de enfermería usadas para el tratamiento de las úlceras por pie diabético incluyen técnicas de cura tradicionales y avanzadas. Frecuentemente su elección depende del criterio personal de la enfermera, en lugar del reconocimiento de la relación costo-efectividad. El objetivo de este estudio es identificar las intervenciones de enfermería de mayor costo-efectividad para el manejo de pacientes con úlceras por pie diabético. Metodología. Se realizó una revisión sistemática en Pubmed, Cochrane y la Biblioteca Virtual De La Salud. Se incluyeron estudios aleatorizados y no aleatorizados de cualquier intervención de enfermería usada para el manejo de úlcera por pie diabético con reporte de costo-efectividad. La selección de los artículos elegibles fue realizada por dos evaluadores independientes. El riesgo de sesgos fue evaluado con las guías Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Resultados. Seis de los ocho artículos incluidos fueron clasificados con alto riesgo de sesgos. Las dos intervenciones en las que se evidenció una mejor relación costo-efectividad en comparación con el grupo control fueron el uso de Beta-Glucan gel (comparado con placebo) y la terapia de presión negativa (comparada con terapia de herida húmeda avanzada). Discusión. Guías nacionales e internacionales para el manejo de enfermería de úlceras por pie diabético proponen al menos 15 diferentes intervenciones. Sin embargo, la escasa disponibilidad de estudios de alta calidad sobre la relación costo-efectividad dificulta la selección y genera mayor variabilidad en las prácticas de enfermería. Conclusión. Es necesario realizar estudios de la relación costo-efectividad con comparaciones directas de las intervenciones de enfermería para el manejo de úlceras por pie diabético.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishNursing interventions used for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers include traditional and advanced healing techniques. Often their choice depends on the nurse’s personal judgment, rather than recognition of cost-effectiveness. The objective of this study is to identify the most cost-effective nursing interventions for the management of patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Methodology. A systematic review was conducted at Pubmed, Cochrane and the Virtual Health Library. Randomized and non-randomized studies of any nursing intervention used for diabetic foot ulcer management with reported cost-effectiveness were included. The selection of eligible articles was made by two independent reviewers. The risk of bias was assessed using the following guidelines: Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Results. Six of the eight included articles were classified at high risk of bias. The two interventions in which a better cost-effectiveness ratio was evidenced compared to the control group were the use of Beta-Glucan gel (compared to placebo) and negative pressure wound therapy (compared to advanced wet wound therapy). Discussion. National and international guidelines for the nursing management of diabetic foot ulcers propose at least 15 different interventions. However, the limited availability of high-quality cost-effectiveness studies makes selection difficult and generates greater variability in nursing practices. Conclusion. Cost-effectiveness studies with direct comparisons of nursing interventions for diabetic foot ulcer management are needed.eng
dc.description.abstractotherAs intervenções de enfermagem usadas para tratar úlceras do pé diabético incluem técnicas de cura tradicionais e avançadas. Frequentemente, sua escolha depende do julgamento pessoal da enfermeira, ao invés do reconhecimento da relação custo-efetividade. O objetivo deste estudo é identificar as intervenções de enfermagem com um maior custo-efetividade para o tratamento de pacientes com úlceras de pé diabético. Metodologia. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática no Pubmed, Cochrane e na Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde. Foram incluídos estudos randomizados e não randomizados de qualquer intervenção de enfermagem utilizada para o tratamento de úlceras do pé diabético com relatórios de custo-efetividade. A seleção dos artigos elegíveis foi feita por dois avaliadores independentes. O risco de tendências foi avaliado com as diretrizes do Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Resultados. Seis dos oito artigos incluídos foram classificados como de alto risco de tendência. As duas intervenções que mostraram uma melhor relação custo-efetividade em comparação com o grupo de controle foram o uso de gel de Beta-Glucan (em comparação com o placebo) e a terapia de pressão negativa (em comparação com a terapia avançada de feridas úmidas). Discussão. Diretrizes nacionais e internacionais para o tratamento de enfermagem de úlceras do pé diabético propõem pelo menos 15 intervenções diferentes. No entanto, a disponibilidade limitada de estudos de alta qualidade sobre a relação custo-efetividade torna difícil a seleção e leva a uma maior variabilidade nas práticas de enfermagem. Conclusão. São necessários estudos que tratem a relação custo-efetividade com comparações diretas de intervenções de enfermagem para o tratamento de úlceras do pé diabético.por
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29375/01237047.3832
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.identifier.issni-ISSN 0123-7047spa
dc.identifier.issne-ISSN 2382-4603spa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/25701
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/medunab/article/view/3832/3391spa
dc.relation.referencesGBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390(10100):1211-1259. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(17)32154-2
dc.relation.referencesGBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7
dc.relation.referencesInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Health Data Exchange [Internet]. GBD results tool; 2020 [citado 10 de septiembre de 2020]. Recuperado a partir de: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-resultstool
dc.relation.referencesVargas-Uricoechea H and Casas-Figueroa LÁ. An Epidemiologic Analysis of Diabetes in Colombia. Annals of Global Health. 2016; 81(6), pp.742-753. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.11.001
dc.relation.referencesEmerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, GaoP, Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative metaanalysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010; 375(9733):2215-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(10)60484-9
dc.relation.referencesPeters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M. Diabetes as a risk factor for stroke in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts, including 775,385 individuals and 12,539 strokes. Lancet. 2014; 383(9933):1973-80. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60040-4
dc.relation.referencesSeferovic JP, Bentley-Lewis R, Claggett B, Diaz R, Gerstein HC, Køber LV, et al. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Subsequent Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome in the ELIXA: The Importance of Disease Duration. J Diabetes Res. 2018. 1631263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1631263
dc.relation.referencesSaed L, Deihim Z, Naghshbandi MK, Rajabnia M, Naleini SN. Cardiovascular events in patients with over 10 years history of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019; 13(1):68-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2018.08.026
dc.relation.referencesKastarinen M., Juutilainen A., Kastarinen H., Salomaa V., Karhapaa P., Tuomilehto J., et al. Risk factors for end-stage renal disease in a community based population: 26-year follow-up of 25,821 men and women in eastern Finland. J. Intern. Med. 2010; 267(6): 612-620. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2796.2009.02197.x
dc.relation.references10. Shen Y, Cai R, Sun J, Dong X, Huang R, Tian S, Wang S. Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for incident chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2017; 55(1):66-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-016-1014-6
dc.relation.referencesVrsalovic M, Vucur K, Vrsalovic Presecki A, Fabijanic D, Milosevic M. Impact of diabetes on mortality in peripheral artery disease: a metaanalysis. Clin Cardiol. 2017; 40(5):287-291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22657
dc.relation.referencesBlanes JI., Lluch I., Morillas C., Nogueira JM., Hernández A. Capítulo 3 Etiopatogenia del pie diabético. En: J. Marinel.lo Roura, Coordinador. Tratado del pie diabético. España: Jarpyo Editores; 2002. p33- 41.
dc.relation.referencesUniversity of Salford Manchester. Limbless statistics. United Kingdom. 2005. Citado 3 nov 2018. Recuperado a partir de: http://www.limblessstatistics. org/
dc.relation.referencesZiegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2008;89(3):422-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005
dc.relation.referencesFont-Jiménez I, Llaurado-Serra M, Roig-Garcia M, De Los Mozos-Perez B, Acebedo-Urdiales S. Retrospective study of the evolution of the incidence of non-traumatic lower-extremity amputations (2007-2013) and risk factors of reamputation. Prim Care Diabetes. 2016;10(6):434-441. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pcd.2016.04.001
dc.relation.referencesVaidya V, Gangan N, Sheehan J. Impact of cardiovascular complications among patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(3):487- 497. doi: https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2015.10 24661
dc.relation.referencesKerr M, Barron E, Chadwick P, et al. The cost of diabetic foot ulcers and amputations to the National Health Service in England. Diabet Med. 2019;36(8):995-1002. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ dme.13973
dc.relation.referencesInternational Diabetes Federation. Atlas de la Diabetes. Séptima Edición. 2015. Citado 3 nov 2018. Recuperado a partir de: https://www. fundaciondiabetes.org/upload/publicaciones_ ficheros/95/IDF_Atlas_2015_SP_WEB_oct2016. pdf
dc.relation.referencesOrganización Mundial de la Salud. Informe mundial sobre la diabetes. 2016. Citado 3 nov 2018. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.who.int/ diabetes/global-report/es/
dc.relation.referencesBarcelo A, Arredondo A, Gordillo-Tobar A, Segovia J, Qiang A. The cost of diabetes in Latin America and the Caribbean in 2015: Evidence for decision and policy makers. J Glob Health. 2017;7(2):020410. doi: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.020410
dc.relation.referencesHicks CW, Selvarajah S, Mathioudakis N, et al. Trends and determinants of costs associated with the inpatient care of diabetic foot ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(5):1247-1254.e2. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.009
dc.relation.referencesGonzález J, Walker J, Einarson T. Cost-of-illness study of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Colombia. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2009;26(1):55-63. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.scielosp.org/ article/rpsp/2009.v26n1/55-63/ doi: https://doi. org/10.1590/S1020-49892009000700009
dc.relation.referencesMéndez FA, Rivero WM. Costos médicos directos de complicación en el tratamiento en pacientes con diabetes mellitus en Colombia 2016 [tesis en Internet]. [Bogotá]: Universidad de Ciencias aplicadas y ambientales; 2016. [Citado 3 nov 2018. Recuperado a partir de: https://repository.udca.edu. co/bitstream/11158/859/1/TESIS%20PARA%20 IMPRESION%20FINAL.pdf
dc.relation.referencesRice JB, Desai U, Cummings AK, Birnbaum HG, Skornicki M, Parsons NB. Burden of diabetic foot ulcers for medicare and private insurers [published correction appears in Diabetes Care. 2014 Sep;37(9):2660]. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):651- 658. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2176
dc.relation.referencesTorra J. Economía de la Salud del Pie Diabético: Una revisión integrativa. En: 2ª Cumbre de las Americas del Pie Diabético; 2017 Oct 12. Ciudad de México. Citado 10 sep 2020. Recuperado a partir de: https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/321151845_ Economia_de_la_Salud_del_Pie_Diabetico_Una_ revision_integrativa-_Diabetic_Foot_Health_ Economics_An_integrative_review_Presentation_ in_Spanish
dc.relation.referencesWang C, Guo M, Zhang N, Wang G. Effectiveness of honey dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2019;34:123-131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.09.004
dc.relation.referencesEverett E, Mathioudakis N. Update on management of diabetic foot ulcers. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1411(1):153-165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ nyas.13569
dc.relation.referencesMartí-Carvajal AJ, Gluud C, Nicola S, Simancas- Racines D, Reveiz L, Oliva P, Cedeño-Taborda J. Growth factors for treating diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(10):CD008548. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008548. pub2
dc.relation.referencesSaco M, Howe N, Nathoo R, Cherpelis B. Comparing the efficacies of alginate, foam, hydrocolloid, hydrofiber, and hydrogel dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining how to dress for success. Dermatol Online J. 2016;22(8). pii: 13030/qt7ph5v17z. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/307566354_Comparing_the_efficacies_ of_alginate_foam_hydrocolloid_hydrofiber_and_ hydrogel_dressings_in_the_management_of_ diabetic_foot_ulcers_and_venous_leg_ulcers_A_ systematic_review_and_meta-analysis_examining
dc.relation.referencesO’Meara S, Cullum N, Majid M, Sheldon T. Systematic reviews of wound care management: (3) antimicrobial agents for chronic wounds; (4) diabetic foot ulceration. Health Technol Assess. 2000; 4(21):1-237. Recuperado a partir de: https://www. journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta4210#/abstract doi: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta4210
dc.relation.referencesSnyder RJ, Hanft JR. Diabetic foot ulcers--effects on QOL, costs, and mortality and the role of standard wound care and advanced-care therapies. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009 Nov 1;55(11):28-38. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.semanticscholar. org/paper/Diabetic-Foot-Ulcers%3A-The- Importance-of-Patient-and-Jagadish-McNally/69658 d1af9aa37c72b38cc661ad7bc2c2d9d6b50
dc.relation.referencesCutting KF. The cost-effectiveness of a novel soluble beta-glucan gel. J Wound Care. 2017;26(5):228-234. doi: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.5.228
dc.relation.referencesDriver VR, Blume PA. Evaluation of wound care and health-care use costs in patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy versus advanced moist wound therapy. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014; 104(2):147-53. doi: https://doi. org/10.7547/0003-0538-104.2.147
dc.relation.referencesWaycaster CR, Gilligan AM, Motley TA. Cost- Effectiveness of Becaplermin Gel on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2016;106(4):273-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.7547/15- 004
dc.relation.referencesZelen CM, Orgill DP, Serena T, Galiano R, Carter MJ, DiDomenico LA, et al. A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safetyand cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2017;14(2):307-315. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ iwj.12600
dc.relation.referencesGilligan AM, Waycaster CR, Landsman AL. Wound closure in patients with DFU: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two cellular/tissue-derived products. J Wound Care. 2015;24(3):149-56. doi: https://doi. org/10.12968/jowc.2015.24.3.149
dc.relation.referencesGilligan AM, Waycaster CR, Motley TA. Costeffectiveness of becaplermin gel on wound healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2015;23(3):353-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ wrr.12285
dc.relation.referencesRice JB, Desai U, Ristovska L, Cummings AK, Birnbaum HG, Skornicki M, et al. Economic outcomes among Medicare patients receiving bioengineered cellular technologies for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J Med Econ. 2015; 18(8):586-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2015.1031793
dc.relation.referencesWilasrusmee C, Marjareonrungrung M, Eamkong S, Attia J, Poprom N, Jirasisrithum S, et al. Maggot therapy for chronic ulcer: a retrospective cohort and a meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2014;37(3):138-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2013.09.005
dc.relation.referencesAalaa M, Malazy OT, Sanjari M, Peimani M, Mohajeri-Tehrani M. Nurses’ role in diabetic foot prevention and care; a review. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2012;11(1):24. Published 2012 Nov 21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6581-11-24
dc.relation.referencesRegistered Nurses’ Association of Ontario. Valoración y manejo de las úlceras de pie diabético. En: Grispun D, Director. Guías de buenas prácticas clínicas. Canadá; 2013. p1- 162. Recuperado a partir de: https://rnao.ca/ sites/rnao-ca/files/2015_-_BPG_Foot_16_01_2015_- _2nd_Edition.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCOLPEDIS. Grupo Colombiano de Pie Diabético. Guías Colombianas para la prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento del pie diabético. Tercera edición. 2019; 1- 63. Recuperado a partir de: https://es.scribd.com/ document/411231925/Guias-Colombianas-Para- La-Prevencion-Diagnostico-y-Tratamiento-Del-Pie- Diabetico-Un-Manejo-Integral-2019
dc.relation.referencesParker CN, Van Netten JJ, Parker TJ, et al. Differences between national and international guidelines for the management of diabetic foot disease. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019;35(2):e3101. doi: https://doi. org/10.1002/dmrr.3101
dc.relation.referencesBeuscher T. Guidelines for Diabetic Foot Care. A Template for the Care of All Feet. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019;46(3):241-245. Recuperado a partir de: https://nursing.201905000-00014.
dc.relation.referencesSchaper NC, van Netten JJ, Apelqvist J, et al. Practical Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36 Suppl 1:e3266. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3266
dc.relation.referencesAsociación latinoamericana de diabetes. Guías ALAD sobre el Diagnóstico, Control y Tratamiento de la Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 con Medicina Basada en Evidencia Edición 2019. 2019. Revista de la ALAD. Recuperado a partir de: http://www.revistaalad.com/ guias/5600AX191_guias_alad_2019.pdf
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/medunab/issue/view/271spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.sourceVol. 24 Núm. 1 (2021): abril - julio, 2021: Pie Diabético, Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias, Educación Médica; 13-26spa
dc.subjectPie diabéticospa
dc.subjectManejo de atención al pacientespa
dc.subjectÚlcera del piespa
dc.subjectEficaciaspa
dc.subjectAnálisis costo-beneficiospa
dc.subject.keywordsMedical scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsLife scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsDiabetic footeng
dc.subject.keywordsPatient care managementeng
dc.subject.keywordsLeg ulcerseng
dc.subject.keywordsEfficacyeng
dc.subject.keywordsCost-benefit analysiseng
dc.subject.keywordsPé diabéticopor
dc.subject.keywordsManejo do cuidado ao pacientepor
dc.subject.keywordsÚlcera do pépor
dc.subject.keywordsEficáciapor
dc.subject.keywordsAnálise de custo-benefíciopor
dc.subject.keywordsMedical scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsLife scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsHealth scienceseng
dc.subject.keywordsCiências médicaspor
dc.subject.keywordsCiências da vidapor
dc.subject.keywordsCiências da saúdepor
dc.subject.lembCiencias médicasspa
dc.subject.lembCiencias de la vidaspa
dc.subject.proposalCiencias de la saludspa
dc.titleCosto-efectividad de las intervenciones de enfermería para el manejo de úlceras por pie diabético: revisión sistemáticaspa
dc.title.translatedCost-effectiveness of nursing interventions for diabetic foot ulcer management: systematic revieweng
dc.title.translatedCusto-efetividade das intervenções de enfermagem para o tratamento das úlceras do pé diabético: uma revisão sistemáticapor
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Artículo.pdf
Tamaño:
637.59 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Artículo
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
183 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista MedUNAB