Aspectos a considerar en la evaluación de la satisfacción en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorAguirre, Andrés F.spa
dc.contributor.authorVillareal, Ángela Pspa
dc.contributor.authorCollazos, César A.spa
dc.contributor.authorGil, Rosaspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T00:20:17Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T00:20:17Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-01
dc.description.abstractCada vez hay un mayor interés en medir y evaluar la experiencia de usuario de manera más objetiva y precisa con respecto a las necesidades reales de los usuarios. Sin embargo, la evolución de la tecnología ha implicado diversos retos que involucran lograr un acercamiento y comprensión de los elementos implícitos en la interacción de un usuario y un sistema interactivo. En el caso de entornos virtuales de aprendizaje, el desafío es mayor, ya que hay aspectos propios del contexto, que los métodos tradicionales son insuficientes para proporcionar una forma adecuada de evaluar la satisfacción de uso en este tipo de entornos. En este artículo se presenta una propuesta que pretende incluir dentro de la evaluación de la satisfacción de uso, elementos cruciales que caracterizan a los sistemas software dedicados al aprendizaje, y a su vez se propone la manera de evaluarlos desde un enfoque emocional.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishEvery time there is an increased interest in measuring and evaluating the user experience more objectively and accurately with respect to the real needs of users. However, the evolution of technology has meant various challenges and has achieved a closer understanding of the implicit elements in the interaction of a user and an interactive system. In the case of virtual learning environments, the challenge is greater as there are contextual specific aspects that traditional methods cannot provide in an adequate way to assess the satisfaction of use in such environments. This proposal intended to include crucial elements that characterize learning software systems and to show how to evaluate these systems from an emotional approach.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doi10.29375/25392115.2494
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.identifier.issn2539-2115
dc.identifier.issn1657-2831
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/8883
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Salud
dc.publisher.programPregrado Medicina
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/rcc/article/view/2494/2131
dc.relation.referencesN. Bevan, “Los nuevos modelos de ISO para la calidad y la calidad en uso del software,” in Calidad del producto y proceso software, Editorial Ra-Ma, 2010, pp. 55–75
dc.relation.referencesG.Cockton,“PuttingValueintoE-valu-ation,”inMaturing Usability, 2008, pp. 287–317
dc.relation.referencesM. Hassenzahl, S. Diefenbach, and A. Göritz, “Needs, affect, and interactiveproducts–Facetsofuserexperience,”Interact. Comput., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 353–362, Sep. 2010
dc.relation.referencesN. Bevan, “Classifying and selecting UX and usability measures,” Int. Work. Meaningful Meas. Valid Useful User Exp. Meas., vol. 11, pp. 13–18, 2008
dc.relation.referencesS. Kujala, V. Roto, K. Väänänen-vainio-mattila, and A. Sinnelä, “Identifying hedonic factors in long-term user experience,” Proc. 2011 Conf. Des. Pleasurable Prod. Interfaces. ACM, no. c, pp. 0–7, 2011
dc.relation.referencesF. Redzuan, A. M. Lokman, and Z. A. Othman, “Kansei Design Model for Engagement in Online Learning: AProposed Model,” Informatics Eng. Inf. Sci., pp. 64–78, 2011
dc.relation.referencesK. Capota, M. Van Hout, and T. Van Der Geest, “Measuring the emotional impact of websites: a study on combining a dimensional and discrete emotion approach in measuring visual appeal of university websites,” in Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces, 2007, no. August, pp. 22–25
dc.relation.referencesD. A. Norman, Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, 2007, p. 272
dc.relation.referencesR. J. Dolan, “Emotion, cognition and behavior,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5596, pp. 1191–4, Nov. 2002
dc.relation.referencesH. Järvenoja and S. Järvelä, “How students describe the sources of their emotional and motivational experiences during the learning process: Aqualitative approach,” Learn. Instr., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 465–480, Oct. 2005
dc.relation.referencesM.NummenmaaandL.Nummenmaa,“Universitystudents' emotions,interestandactivitiesinaweb-basedlearning environment.,” Br. J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 78, no. Pt 1, pp. 163–78, Mar. 2008
dc.relation.referencesY.-S.Wang,“Assessmentoflearnersatisfactionwith asynchronous electronic learning systems,” Inf. Manag., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 75–86, Oct. 2003
dc.relation.referencesD. Y. Shee and Y.-S. Wang, “Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-basede-learningsystem:Amethodologybasedonlearner satisfaction and its applications,” Comput. Educ., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 894–905, Apr. 2008.
dc.relation.referencesN. McNamara and J. Kirakowski, “Measuring user-satisfaction withelectronicconsumerproducts:TheConsumerProducts Questionnaire,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 375–386, Jun. 2011
dc.relation.referencesK. Hornbæk, “Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 79–102, Feb. 2006
dc.relation.referencesJ. P. Chin, V. A. Diehl, and K. L. Norman, “Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface,” ... SIGCHI Conf. Hum. ..., pp. 213–218, 1988
dc.relation.referencesJ. P. Chin, V. A. Diehl, and K. L. Norman, “Questionnaire For User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS),” Human-Computer Interaction Lab, University of Maryland at College Park, 1988. [Online]. Available: http://www.lap.umd.edu/QUIS/index.html. [Accessed: 19-Jan-2015]
dc.relation.referencesT. R. Johnson, J. Zhang, Z. Tang, C. Johnson, and J. P. Turley, “Assessing informatics students' satisfaction with a web-based courseware system.,” Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 181–7, Mar. 2004
dc.relation.referencesT.TullisandW.Albert,MeasuringtheUserExperience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics, 1st ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2008, p. 336
dc.relation.referencesJ. Kirakowski and M. Corbett, “SUMI: The Software Usability Measurement Inventory,” Br. J. Educ. Trchnology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 10–12, 1993
dc.relation.referencesSoftware Usability Measurement Inventory (SUMI),” Human Factors Research Group, University College Cork, 1993. [Online]. Available:http://sumi.ucc.ie/index.html.[Accessed:22-Jan-2015
dc.relation.referencesM. E. A. Obeso, “Metodología de Medición y Evaluación de la Usabilidad en Sitios Web Educativos,” Universidad de Oviedo, 2005
dc.relation.referencesJ. Kirakowski, N. Claridge, and R. Whitehand, “Human centered measures of success in web site design,” in Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Human Factors & the Web, 1998
dc.relation.referencesG. Lindgaard and C. Dudek, “What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction?,” Interact. Comput., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 429–452, Jun. 2003
dc.relation.referencesMeasuring the Usability of Multi-Media System (MUMMS),” Human Factors Research Group, University College Cork, 1996. [Online].Available:http://www.ucc.ie/hfrg/questionnaires/ mumms/info.html. [Accessed: 21-Jan-2015
dc.relation.referencesJ. Brooke, “SUS - Aquick and dirty usability scale,” in Usability evaluationinindustry,P.W.Jordan,B.Thomas,B.A Weerdmeester, and I. L. McClleland, Eds. London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 1996, pp. 189–194
dc.relation.referencesR. Hartson and P. Pyla, The UX book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. Morgan Kaufmann, 2012, p. 968
dc.relation.referencesD. Sward and G. Macarthur, “Making User Experience a Business Strategy,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Towards a UX Manifesto, 2007, pp. 35–40
dc.relation.referencesP. Zaharias, “Ausability evaluation method for e-learning: focus on motivation to learn,” in CHI'06 extended abstracts on Human factors in ..., 2006, pp. 1571–1576
dc.relation.referencesC. Ardito, M. F. Costabile, M. De Marsico, R. Lanzilotti, S. Levialdi, T. Roselli, and V. Rossano, “An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 270–283, Dec. 2005
dc.relation.referencesJ. K. Sinclaire, “Student satisfaction with online learning: Lessons from organizational behavior,” Res. High. Educ. J., pp. 1–20, 2011
dc.relation.referencesS.-S.Liaw,“Investigatingstudents'perceivedsatisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: Acase study of the Blackboard system,” Comput. Educ., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 864–873, Sep. 2008
dc.relation.referencesJ. B. Arbaugh, “Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBAcourses,” J. Manag. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 32–54, 2000
dc.relation.referencesV. A. Thurmond, K. Wambach, H. R. Connirs, and B. B. Frey, “Evaluation of student satisfaction: Determining the impact of a Web-basedenvironmentbycontrollingforstudent characteristics,” Am. J. Distance Educ., no. December 2014, pp. 37–41, 2002
dc.relation.referencesS. K. B. Wong, T. T. Nguyen, E. Chang, and N. Jayaratna, “Usability metrics for e-learning,” in On The Move to Meaningful InternetSystems2003:OTM2003Workshops,2003,pp. 235–252
dc.relation.referencesG. Piccoli, R. Ahmad, and B. Ives, “Web-based virtual learning environments:A researchframeworkandapreliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic ITskills training,” MIS Q., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 401–426, 2001
dc.relation.referencesP. Zaharias and A. Poulymenakou, “Implementing learner-centred design: The interplay between usability and instructional design practices,” Interact. Technol. Smart Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 87–100, 2006
dc.relation.referencesD. Squires, “Usability and Educational Software Design: Special Issue of Interacting with Computers,” Interact. Comput., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 463–466, May 1999
dc.relation.referencesC. Quinn, “Pragmatic evaluation: lessons from usability,” in 13th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 1996
dc.relation.referencesP. R. Albion, “Heuristic evaluation of educational multimedia: from theory to practice,” in Proceedings ASCILITE 1999: 16th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Responding to Diversity, 1999, pp. 9–15
dc.relation.referencesD. Squires and J. Preece, “Predicting quality in educational software:Evaluatingforlearning,usabilityandthesynergy between them,” Interact. Comput., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 467–483, 1999
dc.relation.referencesY. Hassan Montero and F. J. Martín Fernández, “Más allá de la usabilidad: interfaces 'afectivas,'” No Solo Usabilidad, no. 2, 2003
dc.relation.referencesY. Hassan Montero, “Factores del diseño web orientado a la satisfacciónyno-frustracióndeuso,”Rev.españolaDoc. científica, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 239–257, 2006
dc.relation.referencesY. Rogers, H. Sharp, and J. Preece, Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2011, p. 602
dc.relation.referencesI.O.forStandardisation,ISO9241:SoftwareErgonomics Requirements for office work with visual display terminal (VDT). Geneva, Switzerland, 1998
dc.relation.referencesY. Hassan Montero, F. J. M. Fernández, and G. Iazza, “Diseño Web CentradoenelUsuario:UsabilidadyArquitecturadela Información,” Hipertext. net, no. 2, 2004
dc.relation.referencesM. Kurosu and K. Kashimura, “Determinants of the apparent usability [user interfaces],” in Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1995. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century., IEEE International Conference on, 1995, vol. 2, pp. 1509–1514 vol.2
dc.relation.referencesL. Fu and G. Salvendy, “The contribution of apparent and inherent usability to a user's satisfaction in a searching and browsing task on the Web.,” Ergonomics, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 415–24, May 2002
dc.relation.referencesA. Madan and S. K. Dubey, “Usability Evaluation Methods: ALiterature Review,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 4, no. 02, pp. 590–599, 2012
dc.relation.referencesA. De Angeli, A. Sutcliffe, and J. Hartmann, “Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what Influences Users' Preferences?,” Proc. 6th Conf. Des. Interact. Syst., pp. 271–280, 2006
dc.relation.referencesA. Sonderegger and J. Sauer, “The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 403–10, May 2010.
dc.relation.referencesM. Hassenzahl, “The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product,” in Funology, vol. 3, M. Blythe, K. Overbeeke, A. Monk, and P. Wright, Eds. Springer Netherlands, 2005, pp. 31–42
dc.relation.referencesM. H. Harun, “Integrating e-learning into the workplace,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 301–310, 2001
dc.relation.referencesK.-M. Chuah, C.-J. Chen, and C.-S. Teh, “Designing a desktop virtualreality-basedlearningenvironmentwithemotional consideration,” Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–42, 2011
dc.relation.referencesP. Zaharias, M. Belk, P. Germanakos, and G. Samaras, “User Experience in Educational Virtual Worlds,” in CHI 2011, 2011
dc.relation.referencesA. Ferreira Szpiniak and C. VSanz, “Un modelo de evaluación de entornosvirtualesdeenseñanzayaprendizajebasadoenla usabilidad,” IVCongr. Tecnol. en Educ. y Educ. en Tecnol., pp. 382–392, 2012
dc.relation.referencesD. H. Jonassen, J. Howland, J. Moore, and R. M. Marra, “Learning to solve problems with technology: Aconstructivist perspective,” 2002
dc.relation.referencesK.B. Rager, “Ifeel, Therefore, I Learn: The Role of Emotion in Self-Drected Learning,” New Horizons Adult Educ. Hum. Resour. Dev., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 22 - 33, 2009
dc.relation.referencesR. J. MacFadden, “Souls on Ice: Incorporating Emotion in Web-Based Education,” J. Technol. Hum. Serv., vol. 23, no. 1–2, pp. 79–98, Aug. 2005
dc.relation.referencesC. Wang, S. Ke, H. Chuang, H. Tseng, and G. Chen, “E-learning system design with humor and empathy interaction by virtual human to improve students' learning,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, 2010, pp. 615–622
dc.relation.referencesS. Minocha and A. Reeves, “Interaction Design and Usability of Learning Spaces in 3D Multi-user Virtual Worlds,” in Human WorkInteractionDesign:UsabilityinSocial,Culturaland Organizational Contexts, D. Katre, R. Orngreen, P. Yammiyavar, and T. Clemmensen, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 157–167
dc.relation.referencesI. S. O. ISO, “IEC 25010: Systems and software engineering--SystemsandsoftwareQualityRequirementsandEvaluation (SQuaRE)--System and software quality models,” Int. Organ. Stand., 2011
dc.relation.referencesP.ZahariasandA.Poylymenakou,“DevelopingaUsability EvaluationMethodfore-LearningApplications:Beyond Functional Usability,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 75–98, 2009
dc.relation.referencesF. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989
dc.relation.referencesP.-C. Sun, R. J. Tsai, G. Finger, Y.-Y. Chen, and D. Yeh, “What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction,” Comput. Educ., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1183–1202, May 2008
dc.relation.referencesK. A. Pituch and Y. Lee, “The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use,” Comput. Educ., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 222–244, 2006
dc.relation.referencesR. Saadé and B. Bahli, “The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model,” Inf. Manag., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 317–327, 2005
dc.relation.referencesE. W. T. Ngai, J. K. L. Poon, and Y. H. C. Chan, “Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCTusing {TAM},” Comput. Educ., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 250–267, 2007
dc.relation.referencesJ. M. Keller, “First principles of motivation to learn and e-learning,” Distance Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 175–185, Aug. 2008
dc.relation.referencesJ. Ouimette, D. W. Surry, A. Grubb, and D. A. Hall, “Essential booksinthefieldofinstructionaldesignandtechnology,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 731–747, 2009
dc.relation.referencesJ. Xu, K. Le, A. Deitermann, and E. Montague, “How different types of users develop trust in technology: Aqualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology,” Appl. Ergon., no. 0, p. -, 2014
dc.relation.referencesG. L. Urban, C. Amyx, and A. Lorenzon, “Online Trust: State of the Art, New Frontiers, and Research Potential,” J. Interact. Mark., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 179–190, 2009
dc.relation.referencesC. L. Corritore, B. Kracher, and S. Wiedenbeck, “On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 737–758, 2003
dc.relation.referencesJ. Nilsen, R. Molich, C. Snyder, and S. Farrell, “E-Commerce User Experience: Trust,” Nielsen Norman Group, Fremont, CA, 2000. [Online].Available: http://www.nngroup.com/reports/ecommerce-user-experience/. [Accessed: 03-Feb-2001].
dc.relation.referencesA.H.Maslow,R.Frager,andJ.Fadiman,Motivationand personality, vol. 2. Harper & Row New York, 1970.
dc.relation.referencesP. Jordan, Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors. CRC Press, 2000
dc.relation.referencesL. Tiger, The Pursuit of Pleasure. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2000, p. 330
dc.relation.referencesB. Gaver and H. Martin, “Alternatives: Exploring Information AppliancesthroughConceptualDesignProposals,”in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 2000, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 209–216
dc.relation.referencesP. W. Jordan, “Pleasure With Products: Human Factors for Body, Mind and Soul,” in Human Factors in Product Design: Current Practice and Future Trends, W. Green and P. W. Jordan, Eds. CRC Press, 1999, pp. 206–217
dc.relation.referencesP.M.A.Desmet,“Measuringemotion:Developmentand application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products,” in Funology, Springer, 2005, pp. 111–123
dc.relation.referencesL. Shen, M. Wang, and R. Shen, “Affective e-Learning : Using 'Emotional' Data to Improve Learning in Pervasive Learning Environment,” J. Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 12, pp. 176–189, 2009
dc.relation.referencesK. O'Regan, “EMOTION AND E-LEARNING,” J. Asynchronous Learn. networks, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 78–92, 2003
dc.relation.referencesB. Kort, R. Reilly, and R. Picard, “An affective model of interplay betweenemotionsandlearning:Reengineeringeducational pedagogy-building a learning companion,” in Advanced Learning Technologies, IEEE International Conference on, pp. 1–4
dc.relation.referencesA. F. Aguirre, Á. P. Villareal, C. A. Collazos, Y. Méndez, I. Kafure, and R. Gil, “La Importancia del Factor Emocional en el Proceso de EvaluacióndeUsabilidaddeSistemasInteractivos,”in LatinAmerican Conference on Networked and Electronic Media - LACNEM, 2010
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/rcc/article/view/2494
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2015 Revista Colombiana de Computación
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Computación; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2015): Revista Colombiana de Computación; 75-96
dc.subjectIngeniería de sistemas
dc.subjectInvestigaciones
dc.subjectTecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones
dc.subjectTIC´s
dc.subject.keywordsTechnological innovationseng
dc.subject.keywordsComputer scienceeng
dc.subject.keywordsTechnology developmenteng
dc.subject.keywordsSystems engineeringeng
dc.subject.keywordsInvestigationseng
dc.subject.keywordsInformation and communication technologieseng
dc.subject.keywordsICT'seng
dc.subject.keywordsUse satisfaction
dc.subject.keywordsVirtual learning environments
dc.subject.keywordsUser experience
dc.subject.keywordsInstructional design
dc.subject.lembInnovaciones tecnológicas
dc.subject.lembDesarrollo de tecnología
dc.subject.lembCiencia de los computadores
dc.subject.proposalSatisfacción de uso
dc.subject.proposalEntornos virtuales de aprendizaje
dc.subject.proposalExperiencia de usuario
dc.subject.proposalDiseño instruccional
dc.titleAspectos a considerar en la evaluación de la satisfacción en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje
dc.title.translatedAspects to consider in the evaluation of satisfaction in virtual learning environmentseng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversionInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CJournalArticle

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
2015_Aspectos_a_considerar_en_la_evaluación.pdf
Tamaño:
3.11 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Articulo
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Colombiana de Computación