Eficacia y seguridad del manejo endovascular de pacientes con síndrome de vena cava superior

dc.contributor.advisorGalvis Mendez, Melquizidel
dc.contributor.advisorUribe Caputti, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorRomero Socarras, Rubby Esther
dc.contributor.orcidUribe Caputti, Juan Carlos [0000-0002-6602-1045]spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigaciones Clínicasspa
dc.coverage.campusUNAB Campus Bucaramangaspa
dc.coverage.spatialFloridablanca (Santander, Colombia)spa
dc.coverage.temporal2014-2024spa
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-16T13:35:45Z
dc.date.available2026-02-16T13:35:45Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-20
dc.degree.nameEspecialistas en Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticasspa
dc.description.abstractEvaluar la eficacia y seguridad del tratamiento endovascular mediante angioplastia con y sin colocación de stent en la obstrucción de la vena cava superior. Metodología: Estudio observacional, analítico y de evaluación de impacto en pacientes diagnosticados con síndrome de vena cava superior manejados con técnicas endovasculares entre 2014 y 2024. Resultados: Se incluyeron 57 pacientes: 35 (61,4%) tratados con angioplastia sola y 22 (38,6%) con stent inicial. La permeabilidad primaria fue del 79,4% en el grupo de angioplastia sola y del 100% en el grupo con stent, diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p=0,025). La permeabilidad secundaria alcanzó el 100% en ambos grupos. Durante el seguimiento a 12 meses, la tasa de reintervención en el grupo de angioplastia sola fue del 22,8%; de estos, el 33% culminó con colocación diferida de stent. Las complicaciones menores ocurrieron en el 12,5% de los casos, siendo el hematoma en el sitio de punción la más frecuente. La mortalidad fue del 3,5%, asociada a ruptura de la vena cava superior. Conclusiones: El manejo endovascular del síndrome de vena cava superior demostró ser una estrategia segura y eficaz, con alta tasa de mejoría clínica, baja mortalidad y resultados favorables en permeabilidad primaria y secundaria, especialmente cuando se realiza la colocación temprana de stent.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment with angioplasty, with or without stent placement, in patients with superior vena cava obstruction. Methods: Observational, analytical, and impact evaluation study of patients diagnosed with superior vena cava syndrome who underwent endovascular management between 2014 and 2024. Results: A total of 57 patients were included: 35 (61.4%) treated with angioplasty alone and 22 (38.6%) with primary stent placement. Primary patency was 79.4% in the angioplasty group and 100% in the stent group, a statistically significant difference (p=0.025). Secondary patency reached 100% in both groups. At 12-month follow-up, the reintervention rate in the angioplasty group was 22.8%; of these, 33% ultimately required deferred stent placement. Minor complications occurred in 12.5% of cases, with puncture-site hematoma being the most frequent. Mortality was 3.5%, associated with rupture of the superior vena cava. Conclusions: Endovascular management of superior vena cava syndrome proved to be a safe and effective strategy, with high rates of clinical improvement, low mortality, and favorable primary and secondary patency outcomes, particularly when early stent placement was performed.spa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.description.learningmodalityModalidad Presencialspa
dc.description.tableofcontents1. INTRODUCCIÓN 4 2. PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA……………………………………………………..5 2.1 JUSTIFICACIÒN ……………………………………………………………………..5 3. MARCO TEÓRICO ……………………………………………………………………………7 3.1 ANATOMIA DE LA VCS, FUNCIÓN Y VARIANTES ANATÓMICAS………..7 3.2 CAUSAS DE OBSTRUCCIÓN DE LA VCS ………………………………………8 3.3 CUADRO CLINICO…………………………………………………………………9 3.4 DIAGNÓSTICO……………………………………………………………………..10 3.5 TRATAMIENTO ………………………….………………………………..............10 3.6 IMPACTO EN COLOMBIA ……………….……………………………………...14 4. ESTADO DEL ARTE ………………………………………………………………………...15 5. OBJETIVOS …………………………………………………………………………………..19 6. METODOLOGÍA ……………………………………………………………………………..20 7 ALMACENAMIENTO ELECTRÓNICO DE LA INFORMACIÓN ………………….…..21 8. DISPOSICIONES VIGENTES…………………………………………………….................22 8.1 CONSIDERACIONES ÉTICAS…………………………………………………....23 8.2. PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS PERSONALES……………………………………..24 9 RECURSOS HUMANOS, MATERIALES Y FINANCIEROS……………………………..25 RECURSOS HUMANOS……………………………………………………………….25 RECURSOS MATERIALES………………………………………………..………….25 RECURSOS FINANCIEROS…………………………………………………………..25 10. RESULTADOS………………………………………………………………………………26 11. DISCUSIÓN………………………………………………………………………………..…33 12. CONCLUSIÓN…………………………………………………………………………….... 36 13 . BIBLIOGRAFÍA………………………………………………………………………….… 37 ANEXOS ………………………………………………………………………………………… 44spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/32875
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticasspa
dc.publisher.programidERAD-272
dc.relation.references1. Shah RP, Bolaji O, Duhan S, Ariaga AC, Keisham B, Paul T, et al. Superior vena cava syndrome: an umbrella review. Cureus. 2023;15(7). doi:10.7759/cureus.42227spa
dc.relation.references2. Azizi AH, Shafi I, Shah N, Rosenfield K, Schainfeld R, Sista A, et al. Superior vena cava syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(24):2896–2910. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2020.08.038spa
dc.relation.references3. Friedman T, Quencer KB, Kishore SA, Winokur RS, Madoff DC. Malignant venous obstruction: superior vena cava syndrome and beyond. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2017;34(4):398–408. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1608863spa
dc.relation.references4. Quintero M, García Gelvez MI, Latorre Quintana M. Abordaje quirúrgico del síndrome de vena cava superior asociado a neoplasia maligna: revisión narrativa. Rev Oncol Ecu. 2022;32(2):87–99. doi:10.33821/552spa
dc.relation.references5. Klein-Weigel PF, Elitok S, Ruttloff A, Reinhold S, Nielitz J, Steindl J, et al. Superior vena cava syndrome. Vasa. 2020 Oct 26. doi:10.1024/0301-1526/a000908spa
dc.relation.references6. Sfyroeras GS, Antonopoulos CN, Mantas G, Moulakakis KG, Kakisis JD, Brountzos E, et al. A review of open and endovascular treatment of superior vena cava syndrome of benign aetiology. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(2):238–254. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.11.013spa
dc.relation.references7. Akoglu H, Yilmaz R, Peynircioglu B, Arici M, Kirkpantur A, Cil B, et al. A rare complication of hemodialysis catheters: Superior vena cava syndrome. Hemodial Int. 2007;11(4):385–391. doi:10.1111/j.1542-4758.2007.00205.xspa
dc.relation.references8. Bardet J, Fabre D, Brenot P, Watkins C, Fadel E. Kissing stents for superior vena cava syndrome due to mediastinal fibrosis. Open J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 May 29. doi:10.1177/1179065218771900spa
dc.relation.references9. Wilson LD, Detterbeck FC, Yahalom J. Superior vena cava syndrome with malignant causes. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(18):1862–1869. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references11. Dammers R, de Haan MW, Planken NR, van der Sande FM, Tordoir JHM. Central vein obstruction in hemodialysis patients: results of radiological and surgical intervention. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;26(3):317–321. doi:10.1053/ejvs.2002.1943spa
dc.relation.references12. Fu H, Huang X, Zhong L, Osborn MJ, Bjarnason H, Mulpuru S, et al. Outcome and management of pacemaker-induced superior vena cava syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37(11):1470–1476. doi:10.1111/pace.12455spa
dc.relation.references13. Sen I, Kalra M, Gloviczki P. Interventions for superior vena cava syndrome. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2022;63(6):674–681. doi:10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12448-1spa
dc.relation.references13. Sen I, Kalra M, Gloviczki P. Interventions for superior vena cava syndrome. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2022;63(6):674–681. doi:10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12448-1spa
dc.relation.references15. Meier A, Alkadhi H. Venous collateral pathways in superior thoracic inlet obstruction: a systematic analysis of anatomy, embryology, and resulting patterns. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;213(1). doi:10.2214/AJR.18.20172spa
dc.relation.references16. Ahmann FR. A reassessment of the clinical implications of the superior vena caval syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2(8):961–969. doi:10.1200/JCO.1984.2.8.961 17. Cheng S. Superior vena cava syndrome: a contemporary review of a historic disease. Cardiol Rev. 2009;17(1):16–23. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references18. Wright K, Digby GC, Gyawali B, Jad R, Menard A, Moraes FY, et al. Malignant superior vena cava syndrome: a scoping review. 2023 May 3. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references18. Wright K, Digby GC, Gyawali B, Jad R, Menard A, Moraes FY, et al. Malignant superior vena cava syndrome: a scoping review. 2023 May 3. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references20. Zimmermann J, Herrlinger S, Pruy A, Metzger T, Wanner C. Inflammation enhances cardiovascular risk and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1999;55(2):648–658. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00273.xspa
dc.relation.references21. Kapur S, Paik E, Rezaei A, Vu DN. Where there is blood, there is a way: unusual collateral vessels in superior and inferior vena cava obstruction. Radiographics. 2010;30(1):67–78. doi:10.1148/rg.301095724spa
dc.relation.references22. Straka C, Ying J, Kong FM, Willey CD, Kaminski J, Kim DW. Review of evolving etiologies, implications and treatment strategies for the superior vena cava syndrome. Springerplus. 2016;5:229. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-1900-7spa
dc.relation.references23. Köksoy C, Kuzu A, Kutlay J, Erden I, Ozcan H, Ergîn K. The diagnostic value of colour Doppler ultrasound in central venous catheter related thrombosis. Clin Radiol. 1995;50(10):687–689. doi:10.1016/S0009-9260(05)83313-6spa
dc.relation.references24. Schwartz EE, Goodman LR, Haskin ME. Role of CT scanning in the superior vena cava syndrome. Am J Clin Oncol. 1986;9(1):71–78. doi:10.1097/00000421-198602000-00017spa
dc.relation.references25. Stanford W, Doty DB. The role of venography and surgery in the management of patients with superior vena cava obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;41(2):158–163. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(10)62659-8spa
dc.relation.references26. Kee ST, Kinoshita L, Razavi MK, Nyman UR, Semba CP, Dake MD. Superior vena cava syndrome: treatment with catheter-directed thrombolysis and endovascular stent placement. Radiology. 1998;206(1):187–193. doi:10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423671spa
dc.relation.references27. Breault S, Doenz F, Jouannic AM, Qanadli SD. Percutaneous endovascular management of chronic superior vena cava syndrome of benign causes: long-term follow-up. CVIR Endovasc. 2017;27:97–104. Published 2016 Apr 16. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references28. Shaikh I, Berg K, Kman N. Thrombogenic catheter-associated superior vena cava syndrome. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2013;2013:793054. doi:10.1155/2013/793054spa
dc.relation.references29. Parveen W, Uberoi R. Superior vena cava stenting in the 21st century. Postgrad Med J. 2013;89(1050):224–230. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131186spa
dc.relation.references30. Shaheen K, Alraies MC. Superior vena cava syndrome. Cleve Clin J Med. 2012;79(6):410–412. doi:10.3949/ccjm.79a.11106spa
dc.relation.references31. Rachapalli V, Boucher LM. Superior vena cava syndrome: role of the interventionalist. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2014;65(2):168–176. doi:10.1016/j.carj.2012.09.003spa
dc.relation.references32. Nguyen NP, Borok TL, Welsh J, Vinh-Hung V. Safety and effectiveness of vascular endoprosthesis for malignant superior vena cava syndrome. Thorax. 2009;64(2):174–178. doi:10.1136/thx.2007.086017spa
dc.relation.references33. Uberoi R. Quality assurance guidelines for superior vena cava stenting in malignant disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29:319–322. doi:10.1007/s00270-005-0284-9spa
dc.relation.references34. Fagedet D, Thony F, Timsit JF, Rodiere M, Monnin-Bares V, Ferretti GR, et al. Endovascular treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome: results and predictive factors of clinical efficacy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36:140–149. doi:10.1007/s00270-011-0310-zspa
dc.relation.references35. Nagata T, Makutani S, Uchida H, Kichikawa K, Maeda M, Yoshioka T, et al. Follow-up results of 71 patients undergoing metallic stent placement for malignant obstruction of the superior vena cava. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30:959–967. doi:10.1007/s00270-007-9088-4spa
dc.relation.references36. Dinkel HP, Mettke B, Schmid F, Baumgartner I, Triller J, Do DD. Endovascular treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome: is bilateral Wallstent placement superior to unilateral placement? J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10(4):788–797. doi:10.1583/1545-1550(2003)spa
dc.relation.references37. Charnsangavej C, Carrasco CH, Wallace S, Wright KC, Ogawa K, Richli W, et al. Stenosis of the vena cava: preliminary assessment of treatment with expandable metallic stents. Radiology. 1986;161(2):295–298. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references38. Gwon DI, Ko GY, Kim JH, Shin JH, Yoon HK, Sung KB. Malignant superior vena cava syndrome: covered versus uncovered stents. Radiology. 2013;266(3). doi:10.1148/radiol.12120517spa
dc.relation.references38. Gwon DI, Ko GY, Kim JH, Shin JH, Yoon HK, Sung KB. Malignant superior vena cava syndrome: covered versus uncovered stents. Radiology. 2013;266(3). doi:10.1148/radiol.12120517spa
dc.relation.references40. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease: update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;37(1 Suppl 1):S182–S238. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references41. Schillinger F, Schillinger D, Montagnac R, Milcent T. Post catheterisation vein stenosis in haemodialysis: comparative angiographic study of 50 subclavian and 50 internal jugular accesses. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1991;6(10):722–724. doi:10.1093/ndt/6.10.722spa
dc.relation.references42. Jassal SV, Pierratos A, Roscoe JM. Venous stenosis and thrombosis with internal jugular vein catheters for hemodialysis. ASAIO J. 1999;45(4):356–359. doi:10.1097/00002480-199907000-00019spa
dc.relation.references43. Develter W, De Cubber A, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R, Lameire N. Survival and complications of indwelling venous catheters for permanent hemodialysis. Artif Organs. 2005;29(5):399–405. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1594.2005.29067.xspa
dc.relation.references44. Cimochowski GE, Worley E, Rutherford WE, Sartain J, Blondin J, Harter H. Superiority of internal jugular over subclavian access for temporary dialysis. Nephron. 1990;54(2):154–161. doi:10.1159/000185837spa
dc.relation.references45. Ganeshan A, Hon LQ, Warakaulle DR, Morgan R, Uberoi R. Superior vena caval stenting for SVC obstruction: current status. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(2):343–349. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.04.014spa
dc.relation.references46. Nicholson AA, Ettles DF, Arnold A, Greenstone M, Dyet JF. Treatment of malignant superior vena cava obstruction: metal stents or radiation therapy. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;31(5):781–788. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references47. Rizvi AZ, Kalra M, Bjarnason H, Bower TC, Schleck C, Gloviczki P. Benign superior vena cava syndrome: stenting is now first-line treatment. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(2):372–380. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.071spa
dc.relation.references48. Roy R, Tamir S, Friehmann T, Livneh N, Dudnik E, Rozental A, et al. Thrombosis, anticoagulation and outcomes in malignant superior vena cava syndrome. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019;47:121–129. doi:10.1007/s11239-018-1747-6spa
dc.relation.references49. Tanigawa N, Sawada S, Mishima K, Okuda Y, Mizukawa K, Ohmura N, et al. Clinical outcome of stenting in SVC syndrome associated with malignant tumors: comparison with conventional treatment. Acta Radiol. 1998;39(6):669–674. doi:10.3109/02841859809175494spa
dc.relation.references50. Varela D, Guarín M, Hincapié N, Hincapié S, Rodríguez K. Factores no tradicionales influyentes en la calidad de vida de pacientes en hemodiálisis. Rev Colomb Nefrol. 2014;1(1):17–22. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references51. Díaz-Díaz AM, Ardila-Gutiérrez MA, Galvis-Méndez M. Fibrinolytic therapy in newborns with superior vena cava syndrome: case report. Case Reports. 2020;6(2). doi:10.15446/cr.v6n2.83526spa
dc.relation.references52. Colombia. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social; Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público; Cuenta de Alto Costo. Informe de pacientes en terapia dialítica. Bogotá; 2010. [acceso 2016-04-19]. URL: https://cuentadealtocosto.org/site/images/terapia_dialitica_en_colombia_ [DOI no aplica]spa
dc.relation.references53. Sarkar D, Patel B, Komorowski A, Smith L, Moore H, Desai K, et al. Safety and efficacy of unilateral balloon-expandable covered stent-graft placement for malignant SVC syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024;35(3):S221. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references54. Clark K, Zhou W, Saad WE, Davies MG, Waldman DL. Concurrent central venous stent and central venous access device placement in malignant central venous obstruction: patency and function. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(4):602–607. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references55. Azizi AH, Bashir R, Sista AK, et al. Endovascular management of superior vena cava syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021;32(4):530–540. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references56. Mokry T, et al. Self-expanding Sinus-XL stent for malignant SVC obstruction due to NSCLC: retrospective in 23 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(3):357–365. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references57. Uberoi R, et al. Interventional radiology treatment options for superior vena cava obstruction. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34(4):742–756. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references58. Rachapalli V, et al. Endovascular stenting in malignant superior vena cava syndrome: review of the literature. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(4):806–818. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references59. Gwon DI, et al. Vascular complications of superior vena cava stenting: incidence and management. Korean J Radiol. 2016;17(4):522–529. doi:10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.522spa
dc.relation.references60. Funaki B. Superior vena cava rupture and pericardial tamponade. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023;34(7):1283–1284. [DOI pendiente]spa
dc.relation.references61. Holzer RJ, Gauvreau K, Kreutzer J, Trucco SM, Torres A, Shahanavaz S, et al. Balloon angioplasty and stenting of branch pulmonary arteries: adverse events and procedural characteristics—CCISC. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(4):603–610. doi:10.1002/ccd.26204spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordsMedical sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsHealth sciencesspa
dc.subject.keywordsRadiologyspa
dc.subject.keywordsDiagnostic imagingspa
dc.subject.keywordsSuperior vena cava syndromespa
dc.subject.keywordsEndovascular procedurespa
dc.subject.keywordsPrimary patencyspa
dc.subject.keywordsReinterventionspa
dc.subject.keywordsInterventional radiologyspa
dc.subject.keywordsVenae cavaespa
dc.subject.keywordsPulmones (Cáncer)spa
dc.subject.keywordsBlood-vessels (Diseases)spa
dc.subject.lembCiencias médicasspa
dc.subject.lembRadiologíaspa
dc.subject.lembDiagnóstico para imágenesspa
dc.subject.lembVena cavaspa
dc.subject.lembLungs (Cancer)spa
dc.subject.lembVasos sanguíneos (Enfermedades)spa
dc.subject.proposalSíndrome de vena cava superiorspa
dc.subject.proposalProcedimiento endovascularspa
dc.subject.proposalStent venosospa
dc.subject.proposalPermeabilidad primariaspa
dc.subject.proposalReintervenciónspa
dc.subject.proposalRadiología intervencionistaspa
dc.subject.proposalEndovascular procedurespa
dc.titleEficacia y seguridad del manejo endovascular de pacientes con síndrome de vena cava superiorspa
dc.title.translatedEfficacy and Safety of Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Superior Vena Cava Syndromespa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Protocolo final - Rubby Esther Romero.pdf
Tamaño:
610.22 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Licencia.pdf
Tamaño:
946.32 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Licencia

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
829 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: